Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hautly Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of The Hautly Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Hautly Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $20k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
1
’18
9
’19
7
’20
9
’21
9
’22
10
’23
9
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$156kHealth$79kHuman Services$61kCommunity Improvement$11kAnimals$7kYouth Development$6kEducation$5kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME$2,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,000
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$1,000
OUR LITTLE HAVEN$1,000
HOME SWEET HOME STL$1,000
PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE$1,000
ST LOUIS PEREGRINE SOCIETY$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
LUTHERAN FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 11%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 11%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 11%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 11%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 11%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 11%EVANGELICAL CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME STL: $10k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME STL: $1k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME STL: $1k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME STL: $1k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME STL: $1k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME STL: $929 → 11%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165k · 13 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down. Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$165k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+22%

Still filing today

62%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HOME SWEET HOME
    6× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +653%
  • EC
    Evangelical Children's Home
    7× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +37%
  • LF
    LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI
    7× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COLLEGE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • TS
    THRIVE ST LOUIS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -52%
  • LW
    LIFE WATERSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +120%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lutheran Social Services of the South Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of child abuse by empowering children, families and communities.

Human Services
2
St Louis Life

To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.

Housing & Shelter
3
Lutheran Family Services of Ne Inc

Lutheran family services of nebraska, inc.'s (lfs) mission is to express god's love for all people by providing quality human care services that build and strengthen individual, family and community life. our vision is saftey, hope and…

Human Services
4
Lutheran Senior Services

Older adults living life to the fullest.

Human Services
5
Lutheran Counseling and Family Services

Lutheran counseling and family services of wisconsin provides faith-based mental health counseling, family life education and adoption services.

Human Services
6
Lutheran Child and Family Services of in/Ky Inc

Engaging and empowering families and community with love, compassion, faith, and support.

Human Services
7
Lutheran Child and Family Services of Illinois

Lutheran child and family services of illinois (agency) is a nonprofit statewide social service agency whose mission is to attract, develop, mobilize, and prvoide resources to improve the well-being of children, individuals, families,…

—
8
Lutheran Family and Children's Services Foundation

To promote positive change for missouri's children and families by supporting the operations of lutheran family and children's services of missouri in the communities they serve.

Philanthropy
9
Trivium Life Services

Behavioral health, long-term support services, mental health therapy, substance, alcohol and drug abuse treatment as well as domestic violence offender intervention services

Employment
10
Ltc(Eddy) Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. ltc (eddy) is a member of st. peter's health partners and trinity…

—
11
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
12
Lifetrack Resources Inc

Work together to develop the strengths within children, families, and adults facing the greatest life challenges.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Crisis Nursery; the most unlike its peers is Life Waters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THRIVENT CHARITABLE IMPACT & INVESTING: $155,989 · PhilanthropyTHRIVENT CHARITABLE IMPACT & INVESTINGST LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $70,000 · OtherST LOUIS CHILDRENS HOSPITALGREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL BSA: $11,000 · OtherGREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL BSAMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $8,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF EASTERN MISSOURILUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI: $7,000 · OtherLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF M…ST LOUIS PEREGRINE SOCIETY INC: $7,000 · OtherST LOUIS PEREGRINE SOCIETY INCOUR LITTLE HAVEN: $7,000 · OtherOUR LITTLE HAVENSALVATION ARMY: $7,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $6,000 · OtherTHE COLLEGE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · OtherHOME SWEET HOME: $14,929 · Human ServicesHOME SWEET …Evangelical Children's Home: $14,000 · Human ServicesEvangelical…PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $5,500 · Human ServicesPATHWAYS TO…GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRAILNET INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsTHRIVE ST LOUIS INC: $1,000 · HealthLIFE WATERS: $500 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$155,989Other$128,000Human Services$34,429Youth Development$6,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Health$1,000Public Benefit$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOME SWEET HOME: $14,929 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetEvangelical Children's Home: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS PEREGRINE SOCIETY INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE: $5,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLLEGE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHRIVE ST LOUIS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE WATERS: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THRIVENT CHARITABLE IMPACT & INVESTING ↗
  • Who funds HOME SWEET HOME ↗
  • Who funds Evangelical Children's Home ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS PEREGRINE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ST LOUIS BOY SCOUT TRUST FUND ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TRAILNET INC ↗
  • Who funds THRIVE ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE WATERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Edward Jones Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hautly Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hautly Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hautly’s filings →

    More from the funding graph