Skip to content

· Public charity

The Hatedust Project Inc

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, and educational puposes with the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code, 1986, or the corresponding provision of any future law.

$162k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$510kFood & Nutrition$170kEducation$112kHuman Services$89kYouth Development$78kArts & Culture$18kCrime & Legal$5k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $67,135, the rows itemized in this filing. The $161,629 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $94,494 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
$12,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$18,000
MANNA FOODBANK$14,000
MERCED COUNTY FOOD BANK$12,000
MERCED COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL$9,035
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MERCED COUNTY$8,100
VERSAILLES POLICE DEPARTMENT SHOP WITH A COP$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COPS FOR KIDS: $5k → 11%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $20k → 14%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $5k → 14%ASPIRANET: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
KY
MD
AZ
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$830k · 11 repeat orgs$151k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
17

Total granted

$830k
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-1%

Still filing today

64%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $301k · revenue +38%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    7× · 2017–2023 · $162k · revenue +82%
  • TM
    THE MERCED COUNTY FOOD BANK
    7× · 2018–2024 · $156k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • VC
    VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -43%
  • SW
    STUDENTS WITH ASPIRING GOALS
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Merced County Community Action Board aka Merced County Community Action Agency

To serve, advocate, and collaborate for those in need by developing innovative strategies for self-empowerment.

Public Benefit
2
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
3
Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation Inc

See schedule othe marine corps scholarship foundation is the nation's oldest and largest provider of need-based scholarships to military children. founded in 1962, the marine corps scholarship foundation provides access to education for…

Education
4
University of California Merced Foundation

The uc merced foundation was formed for the purpose of encouraging voluntary private gifts, trusts, and bequests for the benefit of the university of california, merced.

Education
5
Make-a-Wish Foundation of Central Ca

Grant the wishes of children between the ages of 2 1/2 and 18 with life-threatening medical conditions to enrich the human experience with hope, strength and joy.

—
6
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
7
Foundation for California Community Colleges

The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.

Education
8
California Children and Families Foundation Inc

The mission of the california children and families foundation is to promote, support, and improve the health and early development of children, from the prenatal stage through five years of age.

Human Services
9
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights
10
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
11
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Mercer County Inc

Our mission is to train and supervise community volunteers appointed by the family court to advocate for the best interests of children who have been removed from their homes due to abuse and/or neglect. our dedicated volunteers strive to…

Human Services
12
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $300,540 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICAPURPLE HEART ANGLERS: $48,600 · OtherPURPLE HEART ANGLERSBALLICO PARENT TEACHER CLUB: $23,722 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MERCED COUNTY: $16,333 · Other+11 more: $84,107 · Other+11 moreRonald McDonald House Global: $161,510 · HealthRonald McDonald House …VALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEAL…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthTHE MERCED COUNTY FOOD BANK: $156,020 · Food & NutritionTHE MERCED COUNTY F…MANNA FOOD BANK INC: $14,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INCMERCED COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,400 · EducationSWAG STUDENTS WITH ASPIRING GOALS: $8,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $25,000 · Human ServicesCOPS FOR KIDS INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesASPIRANET: $5,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MERCED COUNTY: $17,725 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,031 · Youth DevelopmentMERCED COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $17,670 · Arts & Culture
Other$473,302Health$199,010Food & Nutrition$170,020Education$58,400Human Services$35,000Youth Development$27,756Arts & Culture$17,670

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $300,540 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $161,510 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MERCED COUNTY FOOD BANK: $156,020 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetMERCED COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,400 over 4y, 27% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $25,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MERCED COUNTY: $17,725 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetMERCED COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $17,670 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,031 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWAG STUDENTS WITH ASPIRING GOALS: $8,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESNO SKATEBOARD SALVAGE INC: $6,557 over 1y, 10% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of Merced County: $5,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRINITY OAKS ENTERPRISES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMERCY MEDICAL CENTER MERCED FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASPIRANET: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Merced CountyCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Merced County · Stewart Family Foundation · Dutch Bros Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hatedust Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hatedust Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hatedust Project Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Hatedust Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hatedust Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph