Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Harvey Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$206k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Education$1.2MReligion$243kHealth$133kHuman Services$67kRecreation & Sports$20kCommunity Improvement$10kMembership Benefit$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $141k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$325k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Patrick's Church$50,000
Villanova University$35,500
Individual grant recipient$26,000
Academy of Notre Dame de Namur$24,414
Amigos de Jesus$15,100
Hansen Foundation$10,000
St Joseph's University$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Chester Valley Little League$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Chester County Chief of Police$5,000
Jupiter Christian School$2,500
Penney Girls Foundation$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Mothers' Home: $300 → 10%Amigos de Jesus: $19k → 6%Amigos de Jesus: $15k → 6%Amigos de Jesus: $15k → 6%Amigos de Jesus: $5k → 6%Amigos de Jesus: $1k → 6%Amigos de Jesus: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CT
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 22 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
23

Total granted

$1.7M
$172k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+36%

Still filing today

41%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +39%
  • Amigos de Jesus
    6× · 2018–2025 · $56k · revenue +42%
  • SJ
    SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • KU
    Kutztown University
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • LV
    LOVE VAUGHN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • SC
    ST CHARLES BORROMEO
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
4
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
5
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
6
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
7
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
8
Johnson & Johnson Foundation United States Inc
9
Saint Peter's University Hospital

Keeping faith with the teachings of the roman catholic church and guided by the bishop of metuchen, saint peter's university hospital is committed to humble service to humanity, especially the poor, through competence and good stewardship…

Health
10
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
11
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
12
St Joseph's Health System Subordinate Group Return

We are committed to providing exceptional quality care which sustains and improves both individual and community health, with a special concern for those who are poor, vulnerable and underserved.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySubstance Abuse TreatmentIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Senior LivingDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Developmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsLand Conservation Organizat…Community Health CentersYouth Sports Booster Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr15%18%35–55yr17%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr17%11%20–35yr15%1%35–55yr17%83%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,134

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $1,086,732 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY+3 more — $45,250 · EducationIndividual grant recipient — $129,838 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSt Patrick's Church — $127,517 · OtherSt Patrick's ChurchKutztown University — $50,000 · OtherKutztown UniversitySt Mary Magdalen — $39,000 · OtherSt Mary MagdalenACADEMY OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMUR — $36,414 · OtherACADEMY OF NOTRE DAME DE NAMURIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherPaoli Hospital Auxiliary — $29,000 · OtherLOVE VAUGHN FOUNDATION — $25,000 · OtherST CHARLES BORROMEO — $25,000 · OtherFather Bill Atkinson Foundation Guild — $23,000 · Other+23 more — $118,312 · Other+23 moreHANSEN FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · PhilanthropyBLUE BEARDS FOR CHARITY — $2,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyAmigos de Jesus — $55,800 · Human Services+1 more — $300 · Human ServicesTHE RIDDLE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthJupiter Medical Center Inc — $4,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 · HealthUnite for HER — $1,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $500 · HealthWillistown Conservation Trust Inc — $7,500 · EnvironmentFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $300 · International
Education$1,131,982Other$633,081Philanthropy$63,000Human Services$56,100Health$13,000Environment$7,500International$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $1,086,732 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHANSEN FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAmigos de Jesus — $55,800 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHASSEL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetTHE COUNCIL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetWillistown Conservation Trust Inc — $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RIDDLE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Inc — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE BEARDS FOR CHARITY — $2,500 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR — $1,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetUnite for HER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunities of Don Guanella and Divine Providence — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMALVERN PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HANSEN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Amigos de Jesus
  • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds HASSEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE COUNCIL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Willistown Conservation Trust Inc
  • Who funds THE RIDDLE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Inc
  • Who funds JUPITER CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds BLUE BEARDS FOR CHARITY
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Mullen Family FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Mullen Family Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harvey Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Hansen Foundation Inc25% of income from government
  • Jupiter Medical Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harvey Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Harvey Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph