Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Harvey & Gloria Kaylie Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of The Harvey & Gloria Kaylie Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Harvey & Gloria Kaylie Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

31
’17
10
’20
6
’21
6
’22
14
’23
7
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

International$15MHuman Services$4.5MEducation$1.7MHealth$1.5MCivil Rights$1.1MReligion$659kArts & Culture$652kPhilanthropy$476kOther$0
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+3 grants · $929k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$127M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF RAMBAM$400,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND$278,955
OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY SERVICES$250,000
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND$50,000
STAND WITH US$42,500
FRIENDS OF UNITED HAZALAH$31,400
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$28,000
NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHIMES FOUNDATION: $1k → 19%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZALASH: $10k → 13%THE BLUE CARD: $180 → 17%PROJECT LEGACY: $40k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $1.9M → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $1.7M → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $250k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $250k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $180k → 20%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 20%OUR PLACE IN NYC INC: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NJ
CA
UT
MD
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.9M · 13 repeat orgs$4.9M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
52

Total granted

$7.9M
$4.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+54%

Still filing today

85%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +65%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2017–2023 · $870k · revenue +99%
  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $628k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HAZALAH
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • NY
    NEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +222%
  • WC
    WEIL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
University of Judaism Foundation
—
5
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
6
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
7
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
8
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
9
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
11
American Friends of Ohev Yisrael

Support for study of torah and chasiddus in ramat shilo, israel

Religion
12
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Project Legacy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Education and WelfareHomeless Services & HousingCollege Foundation SupportCancer Research FundingCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr19%34%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%2%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%89%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/48
the rest of the field
10%
11,857/120,712

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/44
Grantees still filing
31/44
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,755,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER — $870,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER+12 more — $1,143,125 · International+12 moreOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc — $4,329,750 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home…+5 more — $53,680 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF UNITED HAZALAH — $1,004,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS …WEIL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE — $1,000,000 · OtherWEIL CORNELL MEDI…FRIENDS OF UNITED HAZALAH — $289,900 · OtherFRIENDS OF UNITED…ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $250,000 · OtherISRAEL CANCER RES…Individual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE INSTITUTE FOR ZIONEST STRATEGIES — $135,211 · OtherYESHIVA OHR YISROEL — $133,334 · OtherYehudi Inc — $199,917 · Other+37 more — $759,576 · Other+37 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $2,603,581 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL …+2 more — $74,150 · PhilanthropyNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC — $1,000,000 · Health+3 more — $22,000 · HealthYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $628,231 · EducationSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $50,000 · EducationWESTCHESTER TORAH ACADEMY — $50,000 · Education+3 more — $12,360 · EducationJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE — $570,000 · Arts & Culture
International$12,768,125Human Services$4,383,430Other$3,921,938Philanthropy$2,677,731Health$1,022,000Education$740,591Arts & Culture$570,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,755,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc — $4,329,750 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $2,603,581 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetNEW YORK WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL CENTER FUND INC — $1,000,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER — $870,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $628,231 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE — $570,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetISRAEL CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC — $250,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE — $235,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMORASHA OLAMI INC — $205,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYehudi Inc — $199,917 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetEZER MIZION — $161,060 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetAdi Israel Foundation Inc — $150,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION IN JAFFA INC — $136,378 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC — $102,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWestern Wall Heritage Foundation Inc — $80,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAAGALIM INC — $59,087 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetWESTCHESTER TORAH ACADEMY — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAVIV HA TORAH — $48,800 over 2y, 14% of budgetPROJECT LEGACY — $40,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $28,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chaya-Israel Foundation Inc — $16,125 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetNORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY — $10,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Community Relations Council of New York — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TZALASH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HAKAV HAMEACHED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetYESHIVA HAR TORAH — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARIEL UNIVERSITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPaamonim — $4,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHR VDAAS ROCKLAND INSTITUTE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION — $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR PLACE IN NY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHIMES FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST) — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT NECK STUDENT AID FUND INC — $360 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJewish Federation of …Greater Miami Jewish …The Alan and Elisa Pi…Associated Jewish Cha…FjcUnited Jewish Appeal-…The Ojc FundJewish Community Fede…Jerome L Stern Family…The Norman and Julia …Jay and Jean Schotten…
Jewish Communal FundNY38× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Fjc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Jerome L Stern Family Foundation Inc · The Norman and Julia Bobrow Family Foundation · Jay and Jean Schottenstein Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Harvey & Gloria Kaylie Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Yehudi Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harvey & Gloria Kaylie Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Harvey & Gloria Kaylie Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines