Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harris Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$65kEducation$61kFood & Nutrition$18kArts & Culture$11kEnvironment$8kHuman Services$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$250
Median grant
11
States reached
$520k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FOOD BANK OF LARIMER COUNTY$5,000
NAMI OF COLORADO$2,500
NAMI OF MISSOURI$2,500
ISAAC OF NORTHERN COLORADO$1,500
UC HEALTH NORTHERN COLORADO FDN$1,500
DENVER BOTANICAL GARDENS$625
WILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE$500
ST LOUIS PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE$500
ROCKY MOUNTAIN PBS$500
CROWN CENTER TRIBUTE FUND$500
COLORADO PUBLIC RADIO$500
Individual grant recipient$300
CAMP NEBAGAMON SCHOLARSHIP FUND$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOMELESS GEAR: $500 → 11%MATTHEWS HOUSE: $300 → 11%HOMELESS GEAR: $300 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
MA
CT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$222k · 32 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
10

Total granted

$222k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+31%

Still filing today

69%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +76%
  • NO
    NAMI OF MISSOURI
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +16%
  • TF
    The Food Bank for Larimer County
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +22%
  • BF
    BOULDER FIRE DISASTER RELIEF JEWISH COLORADO
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
3
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
4
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
5
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
6
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation

We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)

Environment
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Alliance for Sustainable Energy Llc

The mission of the alliance for sustainable energy llc (alliance) is to operate the u.s. department of energy's national renewable energy laboratory to advance the science and engineering of energy efficiency, sustainable transportation,…

Science & Tech
12
Discover Life in America Inc

Dlia will develop a model for research in biodiversity and will use the knowledge to develop and disseminate information to encourage the discovery, understanding, preservation, and enjoyment of natural resources.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Bas Bleu Theater Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
24/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $46,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUCHEALTH NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION: $9,000 · OtherUCHEALTH NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $4,750 · OtherST LOUIS PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE: $4,000 · OtherDENVER BOTANICAL GARDENS: $3,425 · Other+21 more: $21,675 · Other+21 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $54,750 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYWILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $900 · EducationNAMI OF MISSOURI: $42,500 · HealthNAMI OF MISSOURINAMI COLORADO: $2,500 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · HealthTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $1,800 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $17,700 · Food & NutritionFORT COLLINS MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY FKA DISCOVERY CENTER SCIENCE MUSEUM: $2,250 · Arts & CultureBas Bleu Theater Company: $2,250 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM: $1,725 · Arts & CulturePUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureColorado Museum of Natural History: $750 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $350 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $3,750 · EnvironmentNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $900 · Environment+1 more: $100 · EnvironmentHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC: $2,800 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE MATTHEWS HOUSE: $300 · Human Services
Other$89,350Education$58,650Health$49,100Food & Nutrition$17,700Arts & Culture$9,325Environment$4,750Human Services$4,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $54,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI OF MISSOURI: $42,500 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County: $17,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUCHEALTH NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE: $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $3,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC: $2,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFORT COLLINS MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY FKA DISCOVERY CENTER SCIENCE MUSEUM: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBas Bleu Theater Company: $2,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL: $1,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $1,725 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $900 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION: $825 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MATTHEWS HOUSE: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO PUBLIC TELEVISION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NAMI OF MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
  • Who funds UCHEALTH NORTHERN COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM JAMES COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds FORT COLLINS MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY FKA DISCOVERY CENTER SCIENCE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Bas Bleu Theater Company ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FOR BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Colorado Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LARIMER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MATTHEWS HOUSE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Northern Colorado United for Youth · Don & May Wilkins Charitable Trust · Woodward Governor Charitable Trust · Nebraska Community Foundation · Verizon Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harris Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harris Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • William James College Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harris Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Harris Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harris’ filings →

More from the funding graph