Skip to content
The Haley Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Haley Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$385k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$3.2MHealth$233kHuman Services$153kEducation$100kArts & Culture$50kPhilanthropy$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $350k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SERVANTS OF CHRIST JESUS$100,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$100,000
WHOLE LIFE AUTHENTIC CARE$100,000
THE GIVEN INSTITUTE$50,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUSTIN'S PLACE: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 7 repeat orgs$788k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$3.1M
$638k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+38%

Still filing today

43%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Augustine Institute Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.2M · revenue +148%
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $150k · revenue +15%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    4× · 2020–2024 · $128k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • AX
    ACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Missiongraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +38%
  • SG
    ST GEORGE CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
2
The Dynamic Catholic Institute

The dynamic catholic mission is to re-energize the catholic church in america by developing world-class resources that inspire people to rediscover the genius of catholicism.

Religion
3
The Life Mapping Initiative

Equipping and Encouraging Individuals to engage in Life-Mapping

—
4
Generation Distinct

Generation Distinct equips to inspire and equip young adults to discover their God-given passions and join the adventure of changing the world for Christ. We create tools for young adults to believe in three core truths: 1) Young people…

Human Services
5
Triveni Institute
Environment
6
Transform Ministries
—
7
Explore God Network
—
8
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
9
Orthodox Christian Leadership Initiative

Orthodox Christian Coaching supports adaptive leadership practice through professional coaching for: Seminary graduates who are embarking on new ministries, priests and ministry leaders who have accepted new parish assignments, lay and…

Religion
10
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
11
Revive Inc

Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…

Health
12
Auburn Theological Seminary

Auburn theological seminary identifies and strengthens leaders from the pulpit to the public square to build community, bridge divides, pursue justice, and heal the world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Augustine Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANDREW'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1,025,000 · OtherST ANDREW'S CATHOLIC CHURCHSERVANTS OF CHRIST JESUS: $300,000 · OtherSERVANTS OF CHRIST JESUSST MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL CHURCH: $250,000 · OtherST MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL CHURCHTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $150,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTINST GEORGE CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: $100,000 · OtherCRISTO REY OF FORT WORTH: $80,000 · Other+6 more: $180,000 · Other+6 moreAugustine Institute Inc: $1,191,000 · EducationAugustine Institute IncACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission: $250,000 · ReligionBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $127,500 · HealthWHOLELIFE AUTHENTIC CARE: $100,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthTEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureJUSTINS PLACE: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$2,185,000Education$1,191,000Religion$250,000Health$232,500Arts & Culture$50,000Human Services$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $1,191,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission: $250,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $150,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $127,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHOLELIFE AUTHENTIC CARE: $100,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTEXAS BALLET THEATER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Given Institute Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTINS PLACE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ACTS XXIX - Mobilizing for Mission ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds WHOLELIFE AUTHENTIC CARE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BALLET THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Given Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JUSTINS PLACE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Endowment FoundationOH9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haley Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haley Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Haley Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home