Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Haldeman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
52
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$180k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$7.3MPhilanthropy$1.4MHealth$555kCrime & Legal$277kYouth Development$212kArts & Culture$195kSocial Science$195kReligion$148kOther$0
02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $340k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $906k
$5,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$180,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE DAF - MATTHEW AND LINDSAY HALDEMAN$180,000
VERTUS HIGH SCHOOL$180,000
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$166,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$100,000
NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL$50,000
ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SQUASH$50,000
ROSS SCHOOL FOUNDATION$35,000
TIPPING POINT$30,000
PUT ME IN$25,000
BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY$25,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$25,000
PA INNOCENCE PROJECT$25,000
MARIN PROMISE PARTNERSHIP$25,000
HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MADONNA MISSION: $5k → 14%PROJECT HOME: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
VA
DC
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 49% of The Haldeman Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Haldeman Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 66 repeat orgs$360k to everyone else

66 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
43

Total granted

$4.6M
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+23%

Still filing today

64%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $77k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    7× · 2018–2025 · $475k · revenue +58%
  • NB
    NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +4%
  • THE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $255k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • BC
    BOSTON COLLEGE LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -18%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Pembroke Hill School

A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."

Education
6
The Public School of Germantown

Germantown academy inspires students to be independent in thought; confident in expression; compassionate in spirit; collaborative in action; and honorable in deed. germantown academy is a private school educating students from pre-k…

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
10
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Belmont Day School Inc; the most unlike its peers is San Francisco International School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/77
Grantees still filing
52/77
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Trustees of Dartmouth College: $5,187,900 · EducationTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $475,025 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGENASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC: $355,000 · Education+22 more: $990,201 · Education+22 moreVANGUARD CHARITABLE DAF - MATTHEW AND LINDSAY HALDEMAN: $505,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE D…VANGUARD CHARITABLE DAF - CHARLOTTE WHITMORE: $325,000 · OtherVANGUARD CHARITABLE D…HARVARD LAW SCHOOL: $145,000 · OtherHARVARD LAW SCHOOLBRYN MAWR HOSPITAL: $90,000 · OtherWAYNE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $70,000 · Other+65 more: $881,800 · Other+65 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $505,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $115,000 · PhilanthropyHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $75,250 · Philanthropy+2 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $155,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $110,000 · HealthTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $101,000 · HealthMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Health+4 more: $8,300 · HealthTHE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT: $255,000 · Crime & LegalWORLD JUSTICE PROJECT: $15,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $6,000 · Crime & LegalSQUASHBUSTERS INC: $128,000 · Youth DevelopmentPUT ME IN INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentB INSPIRED PHILADELPHIA INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY: $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $121,500 · Arts & CultureINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCAPE MAY STAGE INC: $7,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $6,500 · Arts & Culture
Education$7,008,126Other$2,016,800Philanthropy$700,250Health$389,300Crime & Legal$276,000Youth Development$242,500Arts & Culture$155,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $5,187,900 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $505,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $475,025 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC: $355,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT: $255,000 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetVERTUS CHARTER SCHOOL: $186,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $155,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRoss School Foundation: $131,500 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE BALDWIN SCHOOL: $130,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSQUASHBUSTERS INC: $128,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $121,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $115,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $110,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $101,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $85,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC: $75,250 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWilliams College: $61,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $56,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetElevate 215: $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FENN SCHOOL: $53,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEpiscopal Academy: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPUT ME IN INC: $40,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBAKER INDUSTRIES INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College: $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMARIN PROMISE PARTNERSHIP: $27,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetB INSPIRED PHILADELPHIA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DUNBAR CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetInnova Girls Academy Charter School: $17,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD JUSTICE PROJECT: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY: $14,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSLS PRESCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIGMA PHI EPSILON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $8,701 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAPE MAY STAGE INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetSQUASHSMARTS INC: $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PENNSYLVANIA INNOCENCE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds VERTUS CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Ross School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE BALDWIN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SQUASHBUSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Elevate 215 ↗
  • Who funds THE FENN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER COMMUNITY SQUASH INC ↗
  • Who funds Episcopal Academy ↗
  • Who funds PUT ME IN INC ↗
  • Who funds BAKER INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Bowdoin College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA22.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Leslie Miller and Richard Worley Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Hamlin Family Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Cedarcrest Charitable Foundation Aka Blbb Charitable · Connelly Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Haldeman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Haldeman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Cape May Stage Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Mahaiwe Performing Arts Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Martin County: 2% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Haldeman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph