· Private foundation
The Hagler Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $65,000 |
| BREVARD MUSIC CENTER | $45,000 |
| YMCA CAMP GREENVILLE | $19,950 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF NC | $15,000 |
| CMCC | $8,000 |
| PHINIZY CENTER FOR WATER SCIENCES | $2,000 |
| MONROE CO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $1,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CHRISTY BLAKELY | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $400 |
| HISTORIC ALEXANDRIA FDN | $400 |
| FULTON CO LIBRARY LITERACY FDN | $300 |
| NAT ALLIANCE MENTAL ILLNESS CO | $200 |
| WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BMBREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED5× · 2019–2024 · $236k · revenue +48%
- MCMEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED4× · 2017–2020 · $215k · revenue +151%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER AUGUSTA INC4× · 2017–2020 · $76k · revenue +203%
Funded once
- AMAUGUSTA MUSEUM OF HISTORY INCone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -23%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $2k
- UWUNITED WAY OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTYone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…
Ctnc conserves land in ways that inspire and enable people to build resilient, just communities. we carry out our mission in collaboration with other conservation organizations and the communities we serve. our goal is to lessen the…
As a nationally accredited land trust, we conserve and manage land for public benefit in North Carolinas Southern Piedmont. We have conserved 235 properties, totaling 17,786 acres of land. We also facilitate the creation of a 1600 mile…
Protect and conserve land, natural areas, rural landscapes, family farms and historic places within north carolina's heartland
To champion our zoo and its initiatives, wildlife and wild places, with an emphasis on the future.
To promote permanent conservation of the natural resources and scenic beauty of the mountains and foothills of north georgia through land protection, collaborative partnerships and education.
To conserve the rural, natural, and cultural heritage of the new river region, protecting farms, forests, open spaces, and historic places.
The congaree land trust was established to promote voluntary conservation of scenic lands, open spaces, farms, forests, natural areas and significant habitats in central south carolina.
To protect georgia through ecological and economic solutions for stewardship, conservation, and sustainable use of the land and its resources.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is acquiring and protecting lands of regional and national conservation and/or historic significance in the coastal plain of north carolina.
Triangle land conservancy (tlc) strives to create a healthier and more vibrant triangle region by safeguarding clean water, protecting natural habitats, supporting local farms, and connecting people with nature through land protection and…
To conserve the unique character of tennessee's natural and historic landscapes and sites for future generations.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Kidney Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BREVARD MUSIC CENTER INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER AUGUSTA INC ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTA MUSEUM OF HISTORY INC ↗
- Who funds PHINIZY CENTER FOR WATER SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Muddy Sneakers Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TRANSYLVANIA COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL SAVANNAH RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds Conserving Carolina ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Transylvania County Historical Society Inc ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC ALEXANDRIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SHERWOOD FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Central Savannah River Area Inc · Bailey Family Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hagler Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.