· Private foundation
The Hager Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONG ZICHRON MORDECHAI SHLOMO | $2,199 |
| TEHILAT NAAVA SHLACH LACHMECHA | $1,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| GEMACH ZICHRON MOSHE | $1,000 |
| NETIVOS OLAM | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES | $1,000 |
| JEWISH LITERACY FOUNDATION | $800 |
| GEMILAS CHESED CHASDEI DOVID | $500 |
| THE BEIS | $500 |
| YESHIVA & MESIVTA MKOR CHAIM | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| YESHIVA OHAVEI TORAH OF RIVERDALE | $500 |
| RAMOT TORAH SCHOOLS | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Hager Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hager Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Hager Family’s filings →