· Private foundation
The Hageman Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k35 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $101k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| RILEY CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $20,750 |
| CONNER PRAIRIE | $20,000 |
| LEGGE LOWDEN FARM FOUNDATION TRUST | $15,000 |
| JAMES WHITCOMB RILEY MEMORIAL ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| SAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC | $10,000 |
| BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB FOUNDATION INC | $6,465 |
| INDIANAPOLIS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC | $5,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC | $5,000 |
| FEEDING TEAM CORPORATION | $5,000 |
| LAFAYETTE GREAT BANQUET INC | $4,000 |
| IU FOUNDATION | $3,750 |
| WHITE COUNTY REMC COMMUNITY FUND INC | $3,000 |
| GCC FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| DAYSPRING CENTER INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
74 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPConner Prairie Museum Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $105k · revenue +61%
- LLLEGGE LOWDEN FARM FOUNDATION TRUST7× · 2019–2025 · $85k · revenue +22%
- BABOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB FOUNDATION INC7× · 2019–2025 · $45k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- RCRADIANT COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2022 · $6k
- MDMITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
- WCWaynetown Community Fire & Rescueone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…
The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christamore House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jaxson William Augustus Swank Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
112 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 112 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Conner Prairie Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds LEGGE LOWDEN FARM FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds BOONE AND CROCKETT CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds James Whitcomb Riley Memorial Association ↗
- Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds WHITE COUNTY REMC COMMUNITY FUND INC DBA CARROLL WHITE REMC COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds SMALL CHURCH USA CORP ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON COUNTY AREA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Epic International Corporation ↗
- Who funds FARM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Advocates for Children and Families ↗
- Who funds Shepherd Community Inc ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR AFFORDABLE TRANSPORTATION ↗
- Who funds REACH FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds RADIANT COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MITCH DANIELS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Waynetown Community Fire & Rescue ↗
- Who funds Hamilton County Leadership Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hageman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hageman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Hageman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.