Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Grossinger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$308kPhilanthropy$261kHealth$255kYouth Development$128kArts & Culture$120kFood & Nutrition$80kHuman Services$39kReligion$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$80,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO INC$15,000
THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE$15,000
INSTITUTE OF SOIL AND SOUL$10,000
RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$10,000
HARVARD KENNEDY SCHOOL$10,000
THE LYON FAMILY FOUNDATION$7,500
THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$6,044
CONGREGATION OHEV SHALOM$5,026
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$5,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND - KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL - INC$5,000
MOD COLLECTIVE$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC$3,000
WHITE STORK - UNITED STATES LTD$2,581
FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $153k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE BABY FOLD: $2k → 11%THE BABY FOLD: $2k → 11%Birch Family Services: $750 → 17%Birch Family Services: $750 → 17%BIRCH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $750 → 17%BIRCH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $500 → 17%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $3k → 13%Inspiration Corporation: $4k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $3k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $2k → 14%CRISIS CENTER FOR SOUTH SUBURBIA: $250 → 14%MISERICORDIA HOME: $4k → 14%HUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $3k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $33k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $30k → 14%Chicago Lighthouse: $24k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $15k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $10k → 14%Chicago Lighthouse: $8k → 14%The Chicago Lighthouse: $5k → 14%THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $5k → 14%Southwest Chicago Homeless Services: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 43 repeat orgs$192k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

43 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
74

Total granted

$1.3M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+31%

Still filing today

67%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    8× · 2017–2025 · $225k · revenue +13%
  • THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED
    8× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +61%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO
    7× · 2017–2025 · $118k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • LC
    LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • UO
    University of Chicago McLean Center
    one grant, 2021 · $13k
  • CC
    CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
2
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
3
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
4
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
5
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
9
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
10
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
11
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind Or Visually Impaired; the most unlike its peers is The Lyon Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/69
Grantees still filing
50/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $249,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOPE CHICAGO INC: $50,000 · OtherHOPE CHICAGO INCSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $32,500 · OtherGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $30,000 · Other+76 more: $300,101 · Other+76 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $225,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND…MOD COLLECTIVE: $12,557 · Philanthropy+4 more: $13,115 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Chicago: $70,500 · EducationUniversity of C…Wellesley College: $48,600 · EducationWellesley Colle…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $30,000 · EducationPresident and F…ONE MILLION DEGREES: $28,000 · EducationONE MILLION DEG…HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationHOFFMAN INSTITU…LAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $10,000 · Education+5 more: $5,750 · EducationTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $129,225 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO…Inspiration Corporation: $7,500 · Human Services+7 more: $16,000 · Human Services+7 moreBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $117,996 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND …Festival of Children Foundation: $5,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $3,900 · Youth DevelopmentRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · Arts & CultureUNITING VOICES: $34,823 · Arts & CultureTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $8,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $8,500 · Arts & CultureHOPE FOR THE DAY: $40,000 · HealthOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $17,000 · HealthTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $6,544 · Health+7 more: $4,186 · Health
Other$661,701Philanthropy$250,672Education$212,850Human Services$152,725Youth Development$126,896Arts & Culture$91,823Health$67,730

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $225,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $129,225 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $117,996 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $70,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWellesley College: $48,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR THE DAY: $40,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetUNITING VOICES: $34,823 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES: $28,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LYON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $19,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOD COLLECTIVE: $12,557 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetLAKE FOREST ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInspiration Corporation: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NORA PROJECT: $7,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $6,544 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFestival of Children Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMBARC INC: $3,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAL'S ALL-STAR ANGEL FOUNDATION INC: $3,050 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BABY FOLD: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER ORLANDO INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRCH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Stork - United States Ltd: $2,581 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PERLMAN MUSIC PROGRAM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNGER RESOURCE NETWORK: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAcadia Center: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO ACADEMY FOR THE ARTS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLawndale Educational and Regional Network Charter School: $1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,036 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAVODAH THE JEWISH SERVICE CORPS INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR THE DAY ↗
  • Who funds UNITING VOICES ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds ONE MILLION DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LYON FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOD COLLECTIVE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF SOIL AND SOUL ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
  • Who funds THE NORA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds THE MULTIPLE MYELOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR AUTISTIC KIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL27.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · The Lyon Family Foundation · The Kadens Family Foundation · Jarvis Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Baxter International Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Grossinger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Grossinger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
  • Bennington College Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Keshet Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grossinger’s filings →

More from the funding graph