Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gretler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$773k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.6MEducation$1.3MSocial Science$865kHealth$715kCommunity Improvement$570kHousing & Shelter$400kHuman Services$359kReligion$287kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $280k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $485k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$130,000
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$130,000
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$125,000
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$50,000
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$50,000
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$30,000
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$30,000
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$30,000
FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY$25,000
GOOD NEWS IN ACTION INC$25,000
THE UCSB FOUNDATION$25,000
SANSUM DIABETES RESEARCH INST$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$20,000
GOLETA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$15,000
HOPE SCHOOL DISTRICT EDUCATION FND$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MARYAM PARNAM FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $25k → 14%HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $25k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA: $25k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA: $25k → 14%FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.2M · 20 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
3

Total granted

$6.2M
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+37%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GN
    GOOD NEWS IN ACTION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $287k · revenue +224%
  • SD
    Sansum Diabetes Research Institute
    8× · 2018–2025 · $165k · revenue +3%
  • SB
    Santa Barbara Education Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $90k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR COTTAGE REHAB &
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • GV
    Goleta Valley Cottage Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA LOS PADRES CO
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation

It is the mission of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital Foundation to solicit, receive, invest, maintain and distribute funds for the support of charitable, scientific, and educational activities of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital.

Health
2
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital

It is the mission of Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital to provide superior health care for and improve the health care of our communities through a commitment to our core values of excellence, integrity, and compassion.

Health
3
Goleta Valley Professional Buildings Inc

The purpose of Goleta Valley Professional Buildings, Inc. is to provide the technical and physical environment in which quality health care can be provided in a responsible, dignified and efficient manner.

Community Improvement
4
Santa Ynez Valley Cottage Hospital Foundation

It is the mission of the Santa Ynez Valley Cottage Hospital Foundation to develop, manage and channel the community's financial support on behalf of Santa Ynez Valley Cottage Hospital, thereby serving not only to protect, but also enhance…

Health
5
Cottage Health

It is the mission of Cottage Health to provide superior health care for and improve the health care of our communities through a commitment to our core values of excellence, integrity, and compassion.

Religion
6
Santa Ynez Valley Cottage Hospital Inc

It is the mission of Santa Ynez Valley Cottage Hospital (SYVCH) to provide superior health care for and improve the health care of our communities through a commitment to our core values of excellence, integrity, and compassion. SYVCH is a…

Health
7
St Francis Foundation of Santa Barbara

The mission of st. francis foundation of santa barbara is to promote and support health care.

Health
8
California Childrens Hospital Association

Our mission is to advance the well-being of children, promote access to high quality pediatric health care, and ensure the long-term viability of childrens hospitals.

—
9
Cbee Foundation

CBEE aims to improve economic mobility for the next generation of learners by matching talent to jobs and career opportunities. Aligning academic achievements with job market needs, it engages employers while helping learners pursue…

Education
10
Cancer Foundation of Santa Barbara

The cancer foundation is the leading sponsor and largest donor to the ridley-tree cancer center at sansum clinic, the largest provider of cancer care on the central coast. each year, the foundation commits a minimum of 85% (up to 100%) of…

Health
11
Sonoma Valley Education Foundation

The Sonoma Valley Education Foundation exists to improve education by enriching teaching, inspiring learning, and advancing innovative programs that enable every student to succeed.

Philanthropy
12
Southern California Grantmakers

Southern california grantmakers (scg) is the regional association for philanthropists and grantmakers working to make a difference in our communities and around the world. we are a leadership hub for our members to connect with each other,…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UCSB FOUNDATION: $2,490,000 · OtherTHE UCSB FOUNDATIONREGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $815,000 · OtherREGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIACOTTAGE REHABILITATION FOUNDATION: $410,000 · OtherCOTTAGE REHABILITATION FOUNDATIONUC REGENTS: $340,000 · OtherUC REGENTSSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF SB: $300,000 · OtherGOOD NEWS IN ACTION INC: $287,000 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY: $238,500 · OtherGoleta Valley Cottage Hospital Foundation: $215,000 · OtherSANTA BARBARA SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $195,000 · Other+4 more: $255,000 · OtherSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $165,000 · HealthGoleta Valley Cottage Hospital: $50,000 · HealthTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $35,000 · HealthFoundation for Cottage Rehab and Goleta Valley Cottage Hosp: $30,000 · HealthHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $85,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $75,000 · Human ServicesMARYAM PARMAN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSanta Barbara Education Foundation: $90,000 · EducationGOLETA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationCENTRAL COAST JR GOLF INC: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRACE FISHER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$5,745,500Health$280,000Human Services$170,000Education$150,000Youth Development$65,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD NEWS IN ACTION INC: $287,000 over 9y, 8.2% of budgetGoleta Valley Cottage Hospital Foundation: $215,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $165,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSanta Barbara Education Foundation: $90,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetHEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $85,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: $75,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL COAST JR GOLF INC: $65,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetGOLETA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetGoleta Valley Cottage Hospital: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFoundation for Cottage Rehab and Goleta Valley Cottage Hosp: $30,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMARYAM PARMAN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetGRACE FISHER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD NEWS IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Sansum Diabetes Research Institute ↗
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COAST JR GOLF INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLETA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Goleta Valley Cottage Hospital ↗
  • Who funds TEDDY BEAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Cottage Rehab and Goleta Valley Cottage Hosp ↗
  • Who funds MARYAM PARMAN FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds GRACE FISHER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bull Henry W FoundationMN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bull Henry W Foundation · Santa Barbara Foundation · Mosher Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · The Wood-Claeyssens Foundation · Hutton Foundation Dba Hutton Parker Foundation · June G Outhwaite Charitable Trust JS Poucher KL Englert & CM Cooney Co-Tr · Kim and Andrew D Busch Family Foundation · Williams-Corbett Foundation · The B & B Foundation · Alice Tweed Tuohy Foundation · Latkin Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gretler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gretler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gretler Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gretler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gretler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph