Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gregory E Bulger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$142k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.2MCrime & Legal$11kHealth$10kHuman Services$1kCommunity Improvement$100
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$50,000
BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$50,000
SPEAKEASY STAGE CO$25,000
BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY$10,000
LONGWOOD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$2,500
BOSTON EARLY MUSIC FESTIVAL$2,500
GREATER BOSTON LEGAL SVCS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LONGWOOD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 7%NEW REPERTORY THEATRE: $3k → 8%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $10k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $125k → 16%LONGWOOD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $3k → 7%NEW REPERTORY THEATRE: $3k → 8%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $10k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $106k → 16%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $10k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $102k → 16%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $5k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $79k → 16%BOSTON EARLY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $15k → 8%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $5k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON EARLY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10k → 8%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $5k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON EARLY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $4k → 8%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $5k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON EARLY MUSIC FESTIVAL: $3k → 8%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $5k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY: $5k → 12%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $50k → 16%BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $4k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $25k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $10k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $10k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $10k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $10k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $10k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $10k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $10k → 16%SPEAKEASY STAGE CO: $10k → 16%BOSTON CONSERVATORY AT BERKLEE: $20k → 16%BOSTON CONSERVATORY AT BERKLEE: $5k → 16%BOSTON CONSERVATORY AT BERKLEE: $5k → 16%MATTAPAN COMMUNITY HEALTH: $5k → 16%MATTAPAN COMMUNITY HEALTH: $5k → 16%WGBH: $20k → 16%WGBH: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$100 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$1.3M
$100

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $918k · revenue +38%
  • SS
    Speakeasy Stage Company Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +26%
  • BS
    BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • ML
    MASSACHUSETTS LEAGUE OF COMMUNITY H
    one grant, 2019 · $100
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Opera Collaborative

Stage live opera performances.

Arts & Culture
2
Boston Arts Summer Institute Inc
Recreation & Sports
3
Guild of Boston Artists Inc
—
4
Boston Baroque Inc

The organization operates america's first permanent period orchestra and chorus which reach local, national, and international audiences through a subscription series, touring engagements, recordings, and broadcasts.

Arts & Culture
5
Cambridge Symphony Orchestra

Presenting orchestra classical music to underserved communities. Our mission is to make great music accessible to diverse audiences and to harness the power of music to forge lasting relationships with our community.

—
6
Bow Street Theatre Trust
—
7
Actors Company of Natick

The Actors Company of Natick ACON creates theatre with purpose. At ACON, we celebrate artists and challenge community perspectives through equitable, professional and accessible productions.

Arts & Culture
8
Boston Lyric Opera Company

Boston lyric opera inspires, entertains, and connects communities through compelling opera performances, programs, and gatherings.

Arts & Culture
9
Lyrica Boston Inc

Outreach and educational music organization

Arts & Culture
10
Lydianstringquartet

The LYDIAN QUARTET corporation has been formed for charitable purposes, to promote the educational, cultural and artistic enrichment of the residents of Massachusetts and the United States.

Arts & Culture
11
Atlantic Symphony Orchestra Inc

Organize and perform orchestra and chamber music performances for the south shore of boston and beyond.

Arts & Culture
12
Boston Modern Orchestra Project Inc

To build a structurally sound and musically vital ensemble which seeks to explore and present music of the 20th century. all schools, movements and styles from the turn of the century to the present day will be offered. it is the practical…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Longwood Symphony Orchestra Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Repertory Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $918,361 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INCSpeakeasy Stage Company Inc: $105,000 · Arts & CultureSpeakeasy Stage Company IncBOSTON EARLY MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $46,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $25,400 · Arts & CultureWGBH: $35,000 · OtherBOSTON CONSERVATORY AT BERKLEE: $30,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC: $10,500 · OtherNEW REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $10,000 · OtherMATTAPAN COMMUNITY HEALTH: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $1,100 · OtherBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $60,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$1,095,261Other$96,600Education$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $918,361 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSpeakeasy Stage Company Inc: $105,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC: $60,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBOSTON EARLY MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $46,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetLONGWOOD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $25,400 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetGREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC: $10,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW REPERTORY THEATRE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budget18 DEGREES INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds Speakeasy Stage Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARRINGTON STAGE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON EARLY MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LONGWOOD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW REPERTORY THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds 18 DEGREES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gregory E Bulger Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gregory E Bulger Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • 18 Degrees Inc: 60% of income from government
  • Longwood Symphony Orchestra Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Legal Services Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gregory E Bulger’s filings →

More from the funding graph