Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Greenelight Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$63kHousing & Shelter$55kRecreation & Sports$41kHealth$31kPhilanthropy$21kEducation$10kCommunity Improvement$4kInternational$173Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$951k
Total assets

Largely a single collection: about 92% of reported assets are Life Insurance Policy.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION$15,000
JENSEN SCHMIDT TENNIS ACADEMY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MAG FOUNDATION$5,000
VARIETY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $5k → 14%JOHN TRACY CLINIC: $5k → 14%HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 14%HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 14%HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$231k · 10 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$231k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+25%

Still filing today

70%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HOPE THE MISSION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +162%
  • VB
    VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    4× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +112%
  • KI
    KODAWEST INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • VB
    VARIETY BOYS GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • AW
    AHEAD WITH HORSES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -48%
  • FA
    Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles Countygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayfinder Family Services

The mission of Wayfinder Family Services is to ensure that children, youth and adults facing challenges always have a place to turn. Founded in 1953 as the Foundation for the Junior Blind, the organization initially enabled visually…

Human Services
2
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
3
California Federation of Teachers Disaster Relief Fund
Membership Benefit
4
Wheels of Hope La
Human Services
5
Hillsides

We are a premier provider dedicated to healing children and young adults, strengthening families, and transforming communities through quality comprehensive services and advocacy. we envision a world in which children and young adults,…

Human Services
6
Hathaway-Sycamores Child and Family Services

Sycamores nonprofit health organization whose mission is cultivating hope and resilience to enrich the well-being of children, families, and communities through out los angeles and riverside counties.

Human Services
7
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
8
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
9
Achievekids

Achievekids schools provide individualized and multi-disciplinary programs that deliver special education, mental health, and family support services for students ages 5 to 22 who have complex and often severe developmental, emotional, and…

Education
10
The Los Angeles Child Development Center

The los angeles child development center (lacdc) is a non-profit organization whose mission is to provide accessible, affordable mental health services to children who could otherwise not afford them.programs lacdc at camino nuevo charter…

—
11
Listen and Talk

Listen and Talk teaches deaf and hard of hearing children to communicate and learn through listening and spoken language.

Education
12
Los Angeles Accessible Apartments C
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Variety Boys & Girls Club; the most unlike its peers is Operation Project Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $47,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJENSEN SCHMIDT TENNIS ACADEMY: $40,000 · OtherJENSEN SCHMIDT TENNIS ACADEMYKIDS 1ST OF SO CAL: $32,500 · OtherKIDS 1ST OF SO CALVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $25,000 · OtherVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB+7 more: $12,973 · Other+7 moreHOPE THE MISSION: $55,000 · Human ServicesHOPE THE MISSIONJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $10,000 · Human ServicesJOHN TRACY CLINICKODAWEST INC: $15,000 · HealthAHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $3,500 · HealthJONNY BASS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $3,500 · Community ImprovementOperation Project Hope Inc: $800 · EducationNETWORK FOR GOOD: $515 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$157,473Human Services$65,000Health$18,500Arts & Culture$5,000Community Improvement$3,500Education$800Public Safety & Disaster$515

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE THE MISSION: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $25,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetKODAWEST INC: $15,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetJOHN TRACY CLINIC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJONNY BASS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAHEAD WITH HORSES INC: $3,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA EDUCATORS OF THE DEAF: $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOperation Project Hope Inc: $800 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE THE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds VARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds KODAWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN TRACY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds JONNY BASS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds AHEAD WITH HORSES INC ↗
  • Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA EDUCATORS OF THE DEAF ↗
  • Who funds Operation Project Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Greenelight Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Greenelight Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Greenelight Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Greenelight Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Greenelight’s filings →

    More from the funding graph