Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Greenbaum Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
57
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$9.8MFood & Nutrition$5.7MHealth$3.2MCivil Rights$2.4MPhilanthropy$1.8MInternational$1.6MEducation$1.2MEnvironment$1.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $319k
  • $50k–250k36 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.7M
$50,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KARUNA FOUNDATION$1,060,873
HUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION$543,000
FREE TO THRIVE-THRIVE PHILANTHROPY$404,225
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF LIFESTYLE MED$350,000
THE HUMANE LEAGUE$300,000
PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATION FOR NUTRITION$218,200
FRIENDS OF THE EARTH$200,000
ANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS$118,000
GENERATION AWAKENING$116,700
MERIDIAN INSTITUTE$100,000
NEW ROOTS INSTITUTE$100,000
COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING$100,000
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE$100,000
FREEDOM FOR ALL INC$100,000
PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESP MED$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $823k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TRANSPARENTEM: $50k → 20%VEGVOYAGES FOUNDATION: $28k → 6%RISE UP INC: $50k → 19%VEGVOYAGES FOUNDATION: $20k → 6%BALANCED: $100k → 6%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING: $50k → 14%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $40k → 10%BALANCE: $63k → 6%COMPASSION IN WORLD FARMING: $50k → 14%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $40k → 10%THE POLLINATION PROJECT: $7k → 10%US RIGHT TO KNOW: $50k → 10%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $50k → 17%WOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $25k → 17%THORN: $100k → 17%THORN: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$30M · 105 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

105 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2024, 67 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

105
68

Total granted

$30M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+43%

Still filing today

47%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $887k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KF
    Karuna Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +32%
  • TH
    THE HUMANE LEAGUE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +213%
  • AW
    A Well-Fed World
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • TI
    TOSTAN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $360k · revenue +32%
  • EV
    EFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +36%
  • VL
    VERMOUNT LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $159k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
A Just World

Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.

Animals
3
Animal & Vegan Advocacy International Inc

Animal and Vegan Advocacy International, Inc. is dedicated to creating a world in which animals are removed from the food system and other human uses. It furthers this mission by convening advocates through an international conference…

Animals
4
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
5
Institute for Animal Happiness

Growing respect and acceptance for veganism through our dedicated work of rescue and creative care, impactful vegan food programs, vibrant education, and consistent advocacy; all strengthened by our engagement with a rising global network…

Animals
6
Pax Fauna

Pax fauna exists to design a more effective social movement for animal freedom in the u.s., using original research as well as careful study of social movement literature and the recent history of the animal movement, in order to reverse…

Animals
7
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
8
Food Animal Concerns Trust (Fact Inc)

Food animal concerns trust (fact) promotes the safe and humane production of meat, milk, and eggs. fact envisions that all food-producing animals be raised in a healthy and humane manner so that everyone will have access to safe and…

Animals
9
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
10
Well Beings

Well Beings is growing a next-gen movement that elevates and unites animal welfare and environmental protection by shining a spotlight on new models and helping to scale the most promising solutions.

Human Services
11
World Federation for Animals Inc

The world federation for animals (wfa) is a membership organization to improve the well-being of all animals and end exploitation and suffering. wfa has three primary focus areas: policy research, analysis, and information sharing;…

Animals
12
Zero Foodprint

Zero foodprint is mobilizing the food world around agricultural climate solutions. our work aims to create a circular economy that incentivizes practices that actively draw down carbon dioxide and offer our best hope of addressing the…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy for Animals Inc; the most unlike its peers is Speak Out for Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

88 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 88 of the 194 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/88
Grantees still filing
64/88
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FREE TO THRIVE-THRIVE PHILANTHROPY: $1,237,827 · OtherFREE TO THRIVE-THRIVE PHILANTHROPYPROVEG: $1,099,000 · OtherPROVEGANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS: $1,047,000 · OtherAMERICAN COLLEGE OF LIFESTYLE MED: $897,467 · OtherPHYSICIANS ASSOCIATION FOR NUTRITION: $843,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $790,238 · Other+118 more: $14,198,301 · Other+118 moreKaruna Foundation: $1,534,373 · AnimalsKaruna FoundationTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $1,213,525 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE LEAGUEHUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $763,000 · AnimalsHUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FO…MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $595,000 · AnimalsMERCY FOR ANIMALS INCNonhuman Rights Project Inc: $475,000 · AnimalsNonhuman Rights Project …UnchainedTV: $430,000 · AnimalsUnchainedTVANIMAL DEFENSE PARTNERSHIP INC: $350,000 · AnimalsANIMAL OUTLOOK INC: $325,000 · AnimalsSTOP ANIMAL EXPLOITATION NOW: $300,000 · Animals+17 more: $1,630,105 · Animals+17 moreA Well-Fed World: $1,025,000 · Food & NutritionTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $325,000 · Food & NutritionREDUCETARIAN FOUNDATION INC: $235,000 · Food & NutritionVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $126,790 · Food & NutritionSUSTAINABLE ORGANIC INTEGRATED LIVELIHOODS C/O MELANIE STEVENSON: $107,000 · Food & NutritionGame Changers Foundation Inc: $100,000 · Food & NutritionGREENER BY DEFAULT: $100,000 · Food & NutritionNew Roots Institute: $100,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more: $166,000 · Food & NutritionPANORAMA GLOBAL: $400,000 · InternationalTOSTAN INC: $360,000 · InternationalCRISIS ACTION INC: $350,000 · InternationalOPERATION FISTULA: $250,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECT: $150,000 · InternationalAFRICA COLLEGE FUND: $150,000 · InternationalSTRONGMINDS INC: $150,000 · International+3 more: $125,417 · InternationalTRUCKERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING: $300,000 · EducationEDUCATED CHOICES PROGRAM INC: $200,000 · EducationEFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INC: $200,000 · EducationGENERATION AWAKENING: $192,826 · EducationVermont Law School: $150,000 · EducationSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $100,000 · Education+2 more: $11,630 · EducationPREVENTIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $500,000 · HealthAMERICAN COLLEGE OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE: $177,945 · HealthPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $150,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $88,000 · HealthTHORN: $200,000 · Human ServicesBalance Inc: $162,500 · Human ServicesCompassion in World Farming Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE POLLINATION PROJECT FOUNDATION: $87,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN MOVING MILLIONS INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesTRANSPARENTEM LTD: $50,000 · Human ServicesRISE UP INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesUS RIGHT TO KNOW: $50,000 · Human ServicesVegvoyages Foundation: $48,380 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$20,113,033Animals$7,616,003Food & Nutrition$2,284,790International$1,935,417Education$1,154,456Health$915,945Human Services$832,880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKaruna Foundation: $1,534,373 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE LEAGUE: $1,213,525 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetA Well-Fed World: $1,025,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetHUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $763,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMERCY FOR ANIMALS INC: $595,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetPREVENTIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $500,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetNonhuman Rights Project Inc: $475,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetUnchainedTV: $430,000 over 7y, 34% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $400,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTOSTAN INC: $360,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetANIMAL DEFENSE PARTNERSHIP INC: $350,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetCRISIS ACTION INC: $350,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $330,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetANIMAL OUTLOOK INC: $325,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetTHE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC: $325,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTRUCKERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING: $300,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetOPERATION FISTULA: $250,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetREDUCETARIAN FOUNDATION INC: $235,000 over 8y, 8.4% of budgetSENTIENT MEDIA: $225,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetTHE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC: $225,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetTHORN: $200,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetEFFECTIVE VENTURES FOUNDATION USA INC: $200,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMeridian Institute: $200,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAnimal Equality: $200,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetGENERATION AWAKENING: $192,826 over 2y, 42% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE: $177,945 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND: $175,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBalance Inc: $162,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT: $150,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOUR HONOR: $150,000 over 3y, 64% of budgetVermont Law School: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTRONGMINDS INC: $150,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetANIMAL CHARITY EVALUATORS: $139,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetIn Our Backyard: $135,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetVEGAN OUTREACH INC: $126,790 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSUSTAINABLE ORGANIC INTEGRATED LIVELIHOODS C/O MELANIE STEVENSON: $107,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetANIMAL ADVOCACY CAREERS: $100,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCompassion in World Farming Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetGame Changers Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREENER BY DEFAULT: $100,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $100,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetNO MEANS NO WORLDWIDE: $100,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetFREE TO THRIVE: $90,000 over 3y, 26% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $88,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwitch4Good: $87,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Karuna Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds A Well-Fed World ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE AMERICA ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MERCY FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds PREVENTIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Nonhuman Rights Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds UnchainedTV ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds TOSTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL DEFENSE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL OUTLOOK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD FOOD INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FOR ALL INC ↗
  • Who funds STOP ANIMAL EXPLOITATION NOW ↗
  • Who funds TRUCKERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FISTULA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Quinn FoundationKS53× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Quinn Foundation · Vegfund Inc · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Humane America Animal Foundation · Effective Ventures Foundation USA Inc · Aceso Foundation Inc · Animal Charity Evaluators · Tipping Point Private Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Karuna Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Kh Dominion Foundation 5507-21-40

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Greenbaum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Greenbaum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Vermont Law School: 14% of income from government
  • Digital Harbor Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Truckers Against Trafficking: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Greenbaum Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Greenbaum Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 194 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Greenbaum’s filings →

More from the funding graph