Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Grayson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$187k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$408kHealth$336kEducation$127kCommunity Improvement$15kArts & Culture$8kFood & Nutrition$8kReligion$2kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$7,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CURE BLINDNESS PROJECT$50,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BHF$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
MCLEAN HOSPITAL$10,000
NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$7,500
Individual grant recipient$6,760
TRURO COMMUNITY KITCHEN$5,000
CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
FARE$1,500
LETS GET READY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $20k → 8%MY ARMENIAN FOREST: $10k → 10%ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT: $55k → 9%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $20k → 8%ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%CURE BLINDNESS PROJECT: $50k → 9%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $15k → 8%ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT: $45k → 9%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $10k → 8%ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT: $25k → 9%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $10k → 8%ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT: $25k → 9%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $10k → 8%ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT: $25k → 9%CASTLE HILL: $25k → 8%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $10k → 8%ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 17%HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT: $25k → 9%CASTLE HILL: $25k → 8%MCLEAN HOSPITAL: $10k → 8%ORBIS INTERNATIONAL: $22k → 17%HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT: $25k → 9%CASTLE HILL: $20k → 8%CASTLE HILL: $20k → 8%CASTLE HILL: $16k → 8%CASTLE HILL: $15k → 8%CASTLE HILL: $12k → 8%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BHF: $25k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BHF: $25k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BHF: $25k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEART FUND: $15k → 17%DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY NYPH: $15k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEART FUND: $13k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEART FUND: $13k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BHF: $12k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEART FUND: $10k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BHF: $10k → 17%NY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $8k → 17%HAND IN HAND: $25k → 17%HAND IN HAND: $25k → 17%HAND IN HAND: $15k → 17%HAND IN HAND: $11k → 17%RACE AGAINST DIMENTIA: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NY
MA
CT
CA
NE
VA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 23 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$1.0M
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+11%

Still filing today

30%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +310%
  • PC
    PROVINCETOWN COMMONS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +150%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    3× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • DE
    DYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +55%
  • TR
    The Rogosin Institute Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Global Alliance for Tb Drug Development Inc

Tb alliance is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the discovery, development and delivery of better, faster-acting and affordable tuberculosis drugs that are available to those who need them.

Health
3
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Open New York Education Inc

Open new york education, inc. supports public education, awareness, and engagement around housing issues to help build a movement for a more abundant and inclusive new york.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
9
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
The New England College of Optometry

See schedule othe mission of new england college of optometry is to change the way people see the world.we do so by:- integrating innovative education with early and diverse clinical experiences to prepare today's optometrists for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Learning Disabilities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tufenkian Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $197,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $138,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $105,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BHF: $97,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY BHFIndividual grant recipient: $76,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEART FUND: $50,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEART FUNDCURE BLINDNESS PROJECT: $50,000 · OtherCURE BLINDNESS PROJECT+15 more: $118,162 · Other+15 moreHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $225,000 · InternationalHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJE…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 · International+1 more: $100 · InternationalPROVINCETOWN COMMONS INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementTRURO COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionLET'S GET READY INC: $3,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,000 · EducationTUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureThe Rogosin Institute Inc: $1,000 · Health
Other$831,562International$235,100Community Improvement$15,000Food & Nutrition$5,000Education$5,000Philanthropy$2,000Arts & Culture$1,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC: $225,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPROVINCETOWN COMMONS INC: $15,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rogosin Institute Inc: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $100 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PROVINCETOWN COMMONS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LEARNING DISABILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TRURO COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LET'S GET READY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds TUFENKIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DYSTROPHIC EPIDERMOLYSIS BULLOSA RESEARCH ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds The Rogosin Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Grayson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Grayson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Connecticut Science Center Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Provincetown Commons Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Grayson’s filings →

More from the funding graph