Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gray Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$173kReligion$167kHuman Services$158kEnvironment$51kYouth Development$47kEducation$46kInternational$39kCivil Rights$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MACDONELL CHILDREN'S SERVICES$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$3,000
MERCY SHIPS$3,000
ST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$3,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITA$3,000
THE HAVEN$3,000
STFRANCIS UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
VANDERBILT CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$3,000
SKY HIGH - HOUSTON$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CHAPEL HILL UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$3,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$3,000
TEXAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$3,000
BUNK HOUSE INN INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE START CORP: $2k → 16%THE START CORP: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$835k · 52 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

52 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
6

Total granted

$835k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+19%

Still filing today

29%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCivil RightsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +105%
  • TH
    The Haven Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +267%
  • DC
    DULAC COMMUNITY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METH CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $28k
  • LP
    LA PETIT THEATRE DE TERREBONNE
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • RM
    RESURRECTION METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Children's Urgent Care

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
2
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
3
The Methodist Hospital Foundation

Mission: this organization is part of the methodist hospital, doing business as houston methodist hospital, whose mission is: to provide high quality, cost-effective health care that delivers the best value to the people we serve in a…

Health
4
Saint Joseph's Health System Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

Health
5
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
7
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

—
8
Healing Hands Ministries Inc

Hmm health provides quality healthcare to all its neighbors with love, compassion, and respect.

Health
9
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
10
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Saint Joseph's Mercy Care Services Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Dulac Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UMC HOUMA LA: $115,000 · OtherFIRST UMC HOUMA LAMACDONELL CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $47,000 · OtherMACDONELL CHILDREN'S SERVICESLOUISIANA METHODIST CHILDRENS HOME: $41,000 · OtherLOUISIANA METHODIST CHILDRENS HOMENATL JEWISH HOSPITAL: $35,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METH CHURCH: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $27,000 · OtherBUNK HOUSE INN INC: $27,000 · OtherSOUTH LA WETLANDS CHILDRE: $25,000 · OtherDULAC COMMUNITY CENTER: $24,000 · OtherLOUIS CRISIS CENTER: $24,000 · Other+43 more: $302,000 · Other+43 moreTexas Children's Hospital: $34,000 · HealthTexas Childr…The Haven Inc: $29,000 · HealthThe Haven In…AUTISM SPEAKS INC: $15,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAK…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOS…+1 more: $3,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $12,000 · InternationalHELIO FOUNDATION: $4,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $3,000 · InternationalHOPE EXTREME INC: $22,000 · Youth DevelopmentV FOUNDATION OF SOUTH LOUISIANA: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF TERREBONNE INC: $18,000 · Civil RightsSTART Corporation: $15,000 · Human ServicesNicholls State University Foundation: $6,000 · Education
Other$695,000Health$96,000International$39,000Youth Development$29,000Civil Rights$18,000Human Services$15,000Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $34,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Haven Inc: $29,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetDULAC COMMUNITY CENTER: $24,000 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetHOPE EXTREME INC: $22,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF TERREBONNE INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTART Corporation: $15,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNicholls State University Foundation: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HOUMA NATION INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetV FOUNDATION OF SOUTH LOUISIANA: $5,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHELIO FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds The Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds DULAC COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HOPE EXTREME INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF TERREBONNE INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds START Corporation ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds Nicholls State University Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Bayou Community Foundation · Catholic Foundation of South Louisiana · Tbs Spark Foundation · Danos Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gray Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gray Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gray Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Gray Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gray’s filings →

More from the funding graph