Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gramelspacher Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$53kEducation$33kReligion$18kCommunity Improvement$14kRecreation & Sports$14kFood & Nutrition$12kAnimals$8kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$150
Median grant
5
States reached
$638k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BREBEUF FUND$10,785
ST THOMAS AQUINAS$3,000
INDIANAPOLIS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$1,750
ST RICHARDS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$1,150
SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$750
MID-NORTH FOOD PANTRY INC$750
CROSSROADS OF AMERICAS COUNCIL$750
Individual grant recipient$626
ST VINCENT DEPAUL FOOD PANTRY$500
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$300
BROTHERS OF HOLY CROSS$250
AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION$250
CONGREGATION OF HOLY CROSS$250
SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COBURN PLACE: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
MI
WY
IN
OH
CT
CA
CO
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of The Gramelspacher Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in IN; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Gramelspacher Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$135k · 34 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
26

Total granted

$135k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-7%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IZ
    Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +85%
  • SR
    ST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +30%
  • Indiana University Foundation
    4× · 2017–2022 · $3k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • BP
    BOULEVARD PLACE FOOD PANTRY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • S
    SPEAKEASY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
2
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

5
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
6
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
8
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
11
Indiana Institute of Technology Inc

Indiana tech is a private, independent, and non-denominational university. students are prepared for active participation in the complex, global society of the 21st century and are motivated toward a life of significance and worth. about…

Education
12
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Peace Learning Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aspire Higher Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr15%8%5–10yr16%12%10–20yr14%19%20–35yr11%19%35–55yr22%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr15%3%5–10yr16%7%10–20yr14%10%20–35yr11%47%35–55yr22%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
13%
1,810/14,257

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BREBEUF FUND — $34,035 · OtherBREBEUF FUNDST THOMAS AQUINAS SCHOOL — $25,000 · OtherST THOMAS AQUINAS SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $15,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINDIANA CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $12,250 · OtherINDIANA CHAMBER FOUNDATIONST THOMAS AQUINAS — $11,500 · OtherST THOMAS AQUINASBOULEVARD PLACE FOOD PANTRY — $10,000 · OtherBOULEVARD PLACE FOOD PANTRY+47 more — $21,668 · Other+47 moreUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $12,350 · EducationUniversity …Indiana University Foundation — $3,035 · EducationIndiana Uni…INDIANA CITIZEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $750 · Education+5 more — $875 · EducationIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc — $8,194 · AnimalsST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $3,450 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA — $500 · PhilanthropyKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC — $2,380 · EnvironmentSYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED — $1,075 · EnvironmentHOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC — $350 · EnvironmentMID-NORTH FOOD PANTRY INC — $1,750 · Food & NutritionMIDTOWN INDIANAPOLIS INC — $700 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF 38TH INC — $250 · Community Improvement
Other$130,353Education$17,010Animals$8,194Philanthropy$3,950Environment$3,805Food & Nutrition$1,750Community Improvement$950

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $12,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc — $8,194 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL — $3,580 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $3,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $3,035 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC — $2,380 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMID-NORTH FOOD PANTRY INC — $1,750 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED — $1,075 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA CITIZEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $750 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMIDTOWN INDIANAPOLIS INC — $700 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetUSA Swimming Foundation Inc — $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERIDIAN KESSLER NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC — $450 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC — $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF 38TH INC — $250 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT NEVER BROKEN INC — $229 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREENWICH ACADEMY INC — $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetART WITH A HEART INC — $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE LEARNING CENTER INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAUREL SCHOOL — $75 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTECHPOINT FOUNDATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac
  • Who funds Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc
  • Who funds ST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation
  • Who funds KEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC
  • Who funds MID-NORTH FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds SYCAMORE LAND TRUST INCORPORATED
  • Who funds INDIANA CITIZEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MIDTOWN INDIANAPOLIS INC
  • Who funds USA Swimming Foundation Inc
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA
  • Who funds MERIDIAN KESSLER NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC
  • Who funds HOLLIDAY PARK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF 38TH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN25.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Ayres Foundation Inc · Indiana University Health Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gramelspacher Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph