Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gragg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$203k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$713kHuman Services$261kFood & Nutrition$171kInternational$81kArts & Culture$68kCommunity Improvement$66kAnimals$33kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $158k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$20,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF PALESTINE INC$13,000
THE STOCKPOT OF PALESTINE INC$13,000
PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$12,000
OAKWOOD HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
ELKHART HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
PALESTINE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE$10,000
LA POYNER HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
SLOCUM HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
PALESTINE HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
NECHES HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
CAYUGA HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
WESTWOOD HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
FRANKSTON HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
LIVING ALTERNATIVES OF PALESTINE$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $9k → 17%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $8k → 17%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $8k → 17%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $7k → 17%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $7k → 17%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $7k → 17%CHEROKEE COUNTY CRISIS CENTER INC: $5k → 17%PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 19%PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 19%PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $12k → 19%PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 19%PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $6k → 19%PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 19%PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 19%PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $4k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 22 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$1k

Still filing today

36%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PJ
    PALESTINE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $66k · revenue +72%
  • LA
    LIVING ALTERNATIVES OF PALESTINE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +225%
  • PC
    PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +137% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • NE
    NORTHSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Palestine Community Food Bank

Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
2
The Community Food Bank of Franklin County

Food pantry for needy in Franklin County, TX

Food & Nutrition
3
Eastview Community Center

Food Pantry

Community Improvement
4
Community Food Pantry

To provide emergency food for indigent families in the surrounding counties.

Food & Nutrition
5
Community Food Pantry

Providing food to individuals, families

Food & Nutrition
6
Loaves & Fishes Food Pantry

To provide free food for those in need in the Pana, Illinois area

Food & Nutrition
7
Neillsville Area Food Pantry Inc

Emergency Food Pantry

Food & Nutrition
8
Community Provisions of Jackson County

Community food pantry

Food & Nutrition
9
Reidsville Outreach Center

Assistance to the indigent

Human Services
10
Ransom County Food Pantry Inc

Food for families in need

11
Project Care for Inc

Food Pantry

Human Services
12
Pierce County Food Pantry Inc

To provide free groceries, frozen meats, vegetables, fruits, dairy goods, breads and bakery to food insecure households in Pierce County and when mobile food pantry trucks are available provide the same to food insecure households in other…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Palestine Community Food Pantry and the most unlike its peers is Anderson County Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY — $137,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYMEALS ON WHEELS OF PALESTINE INC — $81,500 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS OF PALESTINE INCPALESTINE HIGH SCHOOL — $81,500 · OtherPALESTINE HIGH SCHOOLTHE STOCKPOT OF PALESTINE INC — $81,000 · OtherTHE STOCKPOT OF PALESTINE INCOAKWOOD HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherOAKWOOD HIGH SCHOOLLA POYNER HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherLA POYNER HIGH SCHOOLCAYUGA HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherCAYUGA HIGH SCHOOLFRANKSTON HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherFRANKSTON HIGH SCHOOLNECHES HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherNECHES HIGH SCHOOLWESTWOOD HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherWESTWOOD HIGH SCHOOLELKHART HIGH SCHOOL — $80,000 · OtherELKHART HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $42,500 · OtherSLOCUM HIGH SCHOOL — $40,000 · Other+4 more — $55,000 · OtherLIVING ALTERNATIVES OF PALESTINE — $65,000 · Human ServicesLIVING ALTERNA…PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $62,000 · Human ServicesPALESTINE COMM…CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO — $50,500 · Human ServicesCRISIS CENTER …PALESTINE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE — $65,500 · Community ImprovementPALESTINE COMMUNITY THEATRE INC — $52,000 · Arts & CultureANDERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $33,000 · AnimalsFirst Resource Center — $27,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,078,500Human Services$177,500Community Improvement$65,500Arts & Culture$52,000Animals$33,000Food & Nutrition$27,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF PALESTINE INC — $81,500 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetPALESTINE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE — $65,500 over 8y, 23% of budgetLIVING ALTERNATIVES OF PALESTINE — $65,000 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetPALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $62,000 over 8y, 26% of budgetPALESTINE COMMUNITY THEATRE INC — $52,000 over 8y, 34% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO — $50,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetANDERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $33,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetFirst Resource Center — $27,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetMUSEUM FOR EAST TEXAS CULTURE — $15,500 over 4y, 21% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF PALESTINE INC
  • Who funds PALESTINE JUNIOR SERVICE LEAGUE
  • Who funds LIVING ALTERNATIVES OF PALESTINE
  • Who funds PALESTINE COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds PALESTINE COMMUNITY THEATRE INC
  • Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF ANDERSON & CHEROKEE CO
  • Who funds ANDERSON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds First Resource Center
  • Who funds MUSEUM FOR EAST TEXAS CULTURE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of East-Central TexasTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of East-Central Texas · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gragg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gragg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gragg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph