Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gr & Mf Nichols Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$295kPublic Benefit$34kYouth Development$21kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kFood & Nutrition$17kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$14kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CULVER STOCKTON COLLEGE$20,275
CANTON R-V SCHOOL$5,000
CANTON R-V FIRE PROT DISTRICT$4,368
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$4,000
LEWIS CO FOOD PANTRY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,800
LAGRANGE YOUTH CENTER$2,500
CULVER STOCKTON COLLEGE$2,500
LEWIS CO HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,300
SW BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$2,000
TRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
LINDENWOOD UNIVERSITY$1,000
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY$1,000
SPLASH STATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HEARTLAND RESOURCES: $5k → 14%HEARTLAND RESOURCES: $3k → 14%CANTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$403k · 32 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
26

Total granted

$403k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+6%

Still filing today

28%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SB
    SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +30%
  • CM
    CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +14%
  • MU
    Maryville University - St Louis
    3× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • LC
    LEWIS COUNTY C-1 SCHOOL DIST
    one grant, 2020 · $7k
  • CR
    CANTON R-V FIRE DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • CH
    CANTON HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
2
Cumberland University

The mission of cumberland university is to provide a personalized, high-quality, value-based educational experience that equips learners to lead, serve, and excel in an ever-evolving world.

—
3
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
4
Morningside University

The morningside university experience cultivates a passion for life-long learning and a dedication to ethical leadership and civic responsibility.

Education
5
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education
6
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
7
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education
8
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
9
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
10
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbia College; the most unlike its peers is Canton Community Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF CANTON: $36,046 · OtherCITY OF CANTONUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $33,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURITRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $25,500 · OtherTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITYLAGRANGE YOUTH CENTER: $16,625 · OtherLAGRANGE YOUTH CENTERCULVER STOCKTON COLLEGE -TASC: $16,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISOURI: $10,500 · Other+44 more: $170,214 · Other+44 moreCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $127,875 · EducationCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGESOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7,500 · Education+7 more: $16,000 · Education+7 moreHeartland Resources Inc: $8,000 · Human ServicesCANTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $400 · Human Services
Other$308,385Education$151,375Human Services$8,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $127,875 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHeartland Resources Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWIDER OPPORTUNITIES INC: $2,425 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH EAST COMMUNTIY ACTION CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CHRISTIAN COLLEGE OF THE BIBLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANTON COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $400 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Heartland Resources Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Maryville University - St Louis ↗
  • Who funds WIDER OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Missouri Colleges Fund IncMO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Missouri Colleges Fund Inc · T Michal Flottman Scholarship Trust · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Jl & Da Hays Memorial Scholarship Trust · Virginia Thomas Charitable Trust · Tulsa Community Foundation · Porter Edwin M Educational Fund · Hardin Memorial Scholarship Foundation · William Edgar Charitable Foundation · Bour Memorial Scholarship Fund American National Bank of Texas · George & Hazel Barber Scholarship Trust · Jack J Isgur Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gr & Mf Nichols Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gr & Mf Nichols Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gr & Mf Nichols’ filings →

    More from the funding graph