Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gotzion Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$238kHealth$109kReligion$88kArts & Culture$82kFood & Nutrition$65kRecreation & Sports$23kHuman Services$21kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ashley For The Arts$10,025
Food for the Poor$8,384
St Albert the Great Catholic Church$5,000
St Olaf Catholic Church$5,000
Clean Air-Healthy Air Fair$5,000
Bryce Harman UW Whitewater$4,500
Fight Colorectal Cancer$4,120
PACT-Program of Assertive Community$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,650
Jonyai Green Madison College$3,000
Chloe Rogers UW Stout$3,000
Jackson Nesbitt UW-Madison$3,000
Elaina Maki UW Green Bay$3,000
Ruby Olson Coe College$3,000
Jeremiah Wallis UW Stevens Point$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Custom Canines Service Dog Academy: $3k → 10%Custom Canines Service Dog Academy: $1k → 10%Custom Canines Service Dog Academy: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
WI
MI
MO
KY
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of The Gotzion Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 67%.

The Gotzion Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$416k · 20 repeat orgs$239k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
90

Total granted

$416k
$211k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+29%

Still filing today

30%
4%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ASHLEY FOR THE ARTS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $60k · revenue +83%
  • NB
    NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +141%
  • FC
    FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $17k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • JL
    Joseph Lynch The Laboure Society
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • HA
    Hannah Anderson Gogebic Community C
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • SC
    Samuel Com UW-Madison
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colon Cancer Coalition Inc

To improve health outcomes by reducing barriers to complete colorectal cancer screening and educating the public to advocate for their own health through tailored, local, grassroots solutions.

Health
2
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
3
The Cancer Foundation Inc

The cancer foundation's mission is to alleviate the financial burden of cancer.

Health
4
Appetite for Change Inc

Community-led food justice organization using food as a tool for building health, wealth, and social change.

Human Services
5
Fcancer

FCANCER IS dedicated to advancing health equity through early detection and prevention programs, and by providing resources to navigate, manage, and cope with cancer.

Health
6
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
7
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Community Kitchen

Food service for the poor, economically disadvantaged, and elderly.

Food & Nutrition
9
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
10
Lets Win Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

Let's Win Pancreatic Cancer Foundation (the Organization") is a go-to resource that guides patients and caregivers with vital information for better outcomes. Through a dynamic online platform available in English and Spanish, everyone who…

Health
11
National Pancreatic Cancer Foundation

To deliver unwavering support for patients and families fighting pancreatic cancer.

Health
12
Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Inc

Our mission is to take bold action to improve the lives of everyone impacted by pancreatic cancer by advancing scientific research, building community, sharing knowledge, and advocating for patients.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Deforest Windsor Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 119 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST OLAF CATHOLIC CHURCH: $44,000 · OtherST OLAF CATHOLIC CHURCHSt Albert the Great Catholic Church: $43,000 · OtherSt Albert the Great Catholic ChurchPACT-Program of Assertive Community: $35,500 · OtherPACT-Program of Assertive CommunityIndividual grant recipient: $17,700 · OtherSalvation Army: $15,500 · Other+104 more: $304,857 · Other+104 moreNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 · HealthNATIONAL B…FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC: $17,120 · HealthFIGHT COLO…COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $16,000 · HealthCOLORECTAL…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $61,984 · InternationalFOOD FOR T…ASHLEY FOR THE ARTS: $60,025 · Arts & CultureASHLEY FOR…CUSTOM CANINE SERVICE DOG ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesNORSKI SOCCER CLUB INC: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsDEFOREST WINDSOR FOOD PANTRY INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionRWD YOUTH HOCKEY ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · Youth Development
Other$460,557Health$62,120International$61,984Arts & Culture$60,025Human Services$6,000Recreation & Sports$2,500Food & Nutrition$2,000Youth Development$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $61,984 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetASHLEY FOR THE ARTS: $60,025 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $29,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC: $17,120 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCUSTOM CANINE SERVICE DOG ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDEFOREST WINDSOR FOOD PANTRY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHLEY FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIGHT COLORECTAL CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORECTAL CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CUSTOM CANINE SERVICE DOG ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gotzion Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gotzion Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 119 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gotzion Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph