Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Good Day Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$208kHousing & Shelter$199kHealth$136kScience & Tech$80kEducation$65kArts & Culture$60kFood & Nutrition$53kCrime & Legal$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANNA MINISTRY OF TIDEWATER$40,000
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
MOTE MARINE LABORATORY & AQUARIUM$20,000
NURTURED BY NATURE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THORN: $25k → 14%THORN: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MI
OR
CA
CO
VA
KS
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$675k · 9 repeat orgs$296k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$675k
$236k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+17%

Still filing today

67%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SARAH'S HOME CORPORATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $199k · revenue +140%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +78%
  • MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD INDIA
    one grant, 2021 · $61k
  • KE
    K-LOVE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
2
Turtle Conservancy

The turtle conservancy is dedicated to protecting threatened turtles and tortoises and their habitats worldwide, and to promoting their appreciation by people.

Animals
3
Southern California Equine Foundation Inc

Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses

Animals
4
See Turtles

SEE Turtles connects people with sea turtles in meaningful, personal, and memorable ways. Our organization helps the sea turtle community connect, grow, and thrive by suppoting community-based conservation efforts. Our program provides…

Animals
5
National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc

The nmmf's mission is to improve and protect life for marine mammals, humans, and our shared oceans through science, service, and education. our vision is to be the leading laboratory in marine mammal science, where critical questions…

Animals
6
Save the Sea Turtles International Dba One Ocean Conservation

We empower communities around the globe to protect sea turtles, corals, sharks, and the vital marine species and ecosystems they call home through hands-on conservation, education, and sustainable solutions. our team leads reef and beach…

Animals
7
The Marine Mammal Center

The marine mammal center advances global ocean conservation through marine mammal rescue and rehabilitation, scientific research, and education. the center's work is guided and inspired by a shared vision of a healthy ocean for marine…

Animals
8
Marine Megafauna Foundation

Save threatened marine life using pioneering research, education, and sustainable conservation solutions

International
9
Sea Biscuit Wildlife Shelter Inc

To provide necessary treatment for wild birds that are injured, sick, or orphaned.

Animals
10
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
11
The Dorset Equine Rescue Inc

To rescue, rehabilitate, and re-home abused, neglected and slaughter bound horses of all breads and sizes. To provide a safe, loving and rehabilitative home, including all needed medical care, to every incoming animal. Once ready for their…

Animals
12
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thorn; the most unlike its peers is Mote Marine Laboratory Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRINITY CHURCH: $153,000 · OtherTRINITY CHURCHMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $70,000 · OtherMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INCGOOD SHEPHERD INDIA: $61,195 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD INDIAST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $35,000 · OtherST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOLTRINITY CHURCH INCORPORATED: $35,000 · OtherTRINITY CHURCH INCORPORATEDK-LOVE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $30,055 · OtherK-LOVE EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATIONST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherRICK PRICE MINISTRIES: $20,000 · Other+9 more: $78,970 · Other+9 moreSARAH'S HOME CORPORATION: $198,814 · Housing & ShelterSARAH'S HOME CORPORATIO…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…Nurtured by Nature: $40,500 · AnimalsDOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · AnimalsBARN SANCTUARY: $3,000 · AnimalsMANNA MINISTRY OF TIDEWATER: $40,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $3,000 · Food & NutritionTHORN: $33,000 · Human ServicesNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$503,220Housing & Shelter$198,814Health$90,000Animals$63,500Food & Nutrition$53,000Human Services$33,000Arts & Culture$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSARAH'S HOME CORPORATION: $198,814 over 4y, 12% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNurtured by Nature: $40,500 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetMANNA MINISTRY OF TIDEWATER: $40,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHORN: $33,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONY ACRES EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRiding Institute for Disabled Equestrians Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetBARN SANCTUARY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSea Turtle Conservancy: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SARAH'S HOME CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
  • Who funds Nurtured by Nature ↗
  • Who funds MANNA MINISTRY OF TIDEWATER ↗
  • Who funds THORN ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY ACRES EQUESTRIAN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Riding Institute for Disabled Equestrians Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARN SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds Sea Turtle Conservancy ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clough Family FoundationCO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clough Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Good Day Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Good Day Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Sea Turtle Conservancy: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Good Day Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Good Day Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Good Day’s filings →

More from the funding graph