Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Goldstein Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Goldstein Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Goldstein Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 9 organizations, $92k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’18
5
’19
5
’20
5
’21
5
’22
5
’23
9
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.6MEducation$92kHealth$71kHuman Services$45kRecreation & Sports$19kFood & Nutrition$8kInternational$6kReligion$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $56k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Marcus Jewish Community Center$15,000
The Fragile X Association of Atlanta$11,000
ADL$10,000
UC Davis Foundation$10,000
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta$10,000
Chattahoochee Riverkeeper$6,000
Jewish National Fund$5,000
Park Pride$5,000
Global Growers Network$5,000
Jewish Kids Group$5,000
J screen at Emory University$3,000
Candler Park Conservancy$2,500
Wholesome Wave Georgia$2,000
Rebecca's Tent$1,500
Jewish Education Loan Fund$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Marcus Jewish Community Center: $15k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$286k · 10 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$286k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+114%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsFood & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +148%
  • FX
    FRAGILE X ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $60k · revenue +43% · 35% of their budget
  • MJ
    MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $45k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • HI
    HIAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +114%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Goldman Sachs Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

The jewish federation of greater washington (federation) envisions a connected and vibrant jewish community that cares for each other, fosters jewish learning and journeys, embraces jewish peoplehood and israel, and acts as a force for…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Family & Career Services Inc

To transform lives.

Human Services
4
Pirchei of Atlanta

Summer Educational camp for children.

Education
5
The Goldenberg Family Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia

The jewish federation of greater philadelphia mobilizes financial and volunteer resources to create a bright future for jewish people everywhere. the jewish federation cares for those in need, combats antisemitism and global crises, and…

Philanthropy
8
Hillels of Georgia Inc

To engage and enrich the lives of Jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the Jewish people and the world by empowering students to build vital Jewish communities on campus and inspire them to embrace a future of…

—
9
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
10
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
11
Atlanta Association of Legal Administrators Foundation Inc
—
12
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Park Pride Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fragile X Association of Georgia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,506,104 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $65,000 · PhilanthropyFRAGILE X ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA INC: $60,000 · OtherFRAGILE X …ADL: $34,000 · OtherADLIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual…J screen at Emory University: $15,000 · OtherJ screen a…The Fragile X Association of Atlanta: $11,000 · OtherThe Fragil…JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND INC: $7,000 · OtherJewish Kids Group: $6,000 · Other+3 more: $7,500 · OtherTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationMARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesPARK PRIDE INC: $16,000 · Recreation & SportsCANDLER PARK CONSERVANCY: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsGLOBAL GROWERS NETWORK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC: $6,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$1,571,104Other$170,500Education$70,000Human Services$45,000Recreation & Sports$18,500Food & Nutrition$8,000Environment$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $1,506,104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRAGILE X ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA INC: $60,000 over 6y, 35% of budgetMARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARK PRIDE INC: $16,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL GROWERS NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCANDLER PARK CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREBECCA'S TENT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHIAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRAGILE X ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds PARK PRIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH EDUCATIONAL LOAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GROWERS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CANDLER PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds REBECCA'S TENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Arthur M Blank Family FoundationGA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Goldstein Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Goldstein Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Goldstein Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Goldstein Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Goldstein Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph