Skip to content
The Git-R-Done Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Git-R-Done Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$436k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$893kReligion$409kRecreation & Sports$223kHuman Services$220kYouth Development$99kInternational$90kHousing & Shelter$79kFood & Nutrition$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $284k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYAN FOUNDATION$56,250
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$40,000
STILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY$30,000
KINGDOM SPORTS$26,000
DREAM HUNT FOUNDATION$20,014
CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS$20,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$16,000
RISE ADAPTIVE SPORTS$11,974
CLINIC WITH A HEART$10,358
RENEWED VALOR INC$10,000
NEW VISIONS HOMELESS SERVICES$10,000
HEROS FOR CHILDREN$10,000
OPERATION HOMEFRONT$10,000
WE CAN DO THIS$10,000
BACK TO THE BIBLE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS: $20k → 10%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%THE FINLEY PROJECT: $5k → 13%CHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CARES: $2k → 15%DREAM HUNT FOUNDATION: $20k → 20%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $10k → 12%CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS: $10k → 10%THE FINLEY PROJECT: $5k → 13%DREAM HUNT FOUNDATION: $10k → 20%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $10k → 12%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT: $10k → 16%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $10k → 14%CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $5k → 14%MIDWEST YOUCAN FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%CHRISTIAN HERITAGE: $17k → 13%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%WINDSONG EQUITHERAPY: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
DE
KS
TN
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 28 repeat orgs$482k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
36

Total granted

$1.8M
$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+21%

Still filing today

75%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CLINIC WITH A HEART INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +17%
  • SW
    STILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $133k · revenue +34%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $115k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • OY
    OMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +10%
  • GL
    Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +30%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $26k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
2
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
3
Chariots for Hope Inc

Chariots for hope shares the hope of christ by loving kenyan children through christian discipleship and long-term physical, emotional, and educational care and provision. the vision of chariots for hope is to create a transformed future…

International
4
Hope and Home

Hope & home creates ways for amazing people to change the lives of children in foster care. as a nondenominational christian charity, hope & home trains, certifies, and actively supports foster families across the state of colorado.…

Human Services
5
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
6
Children's Hunger Fund

Our mission is to deliver hope to suffering children by equipping local churches for gospel-centered mercy ministry.

International
7
Hope Reins

Hope reins' vision is to inspire true hope and real healing for every child. at our ranch, we pair children and teens experiencing trauma with a rescued horse and mentor to find hope and healing. the free-of-charge individual and group…

Health
8
Here to Serve Inc

We believe a child's cancer journey is life-altering for both the child and family. For that reason, the care and support of the family are required to avoid parent(s) from losing their health, home, job, and/or entering into bankruptcy.…

Human Services
9
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
10
Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

—
11
Collins Home Family Ministries

Collins family ministries, inc. exists to embody the love of christ by providing compassion to families, children, and at-risk youth who are experiencing hardship. we provide shelter for children, strength to families, and stability to our…

—
12
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heroes for Children; the most unlike its peers is Sacramento Police Canine Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/54
Grantees still filing
31/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Bryan Foundation: $425,230 · HealthBryan FoundationCLINIC WITH A HEART INC: $160,358 · HealthCLINIC WITH A HEART INCSTILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY: $133,000 · HealthSTILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMYGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $40,100 · Health+5 more: $47,500 · Health+5 moreBACK TO THE BIBLE: $369,440 · ReligionBACK TO THE BIBLEREDEEMING LIFE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 · ReligionREDEEMING LIFE OUTRE…Individual grant recipient: $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…Individual grant recipient: $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…HEROES FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 · OtherMOFFITT CANCER CENTER: $20,000 · OtherPERFECT 33 FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherRISE ADVENTURES INC: $23,974 · OtherOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $20,000 · Other+38 more: $309,897 · Other+38 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP …Called to Compete Inc: $52,000 · Youth DevelopmentCalled to C…OMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentOMAHA YOUTH…CROSSROADS CORRAL INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAM HUNT FOUNDATION INC: $30,014 · Human ServicesDREAM HUNT…MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Human ServicesMILITARY W…THE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST…CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHILD PROT…THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA …CHRISTIAN HERITAGE CHILDREN'S HOME: $16,545 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN …FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE FINLEY PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesWE CAN DO THIS INC: $10,000 · Human Services+5 more: $18,563 · Human Services+5 moreWINGS OF HOPE: $45,000 · InternationalHOPE VENTURE: $42,000 · International+2 more: $2,968 · InternationalHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $58,961 · Housing & Shelter
Health$806,188Religion$399,440Other$470,871Youth Development$227,000Human Services$205,622International$89,968Housing & Shelter$58,961

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBryan Foundation: $425,230 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetBACK TO THE BIBLE: $369,440 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetCLINIC WITH A HEART INC: $160,358 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetSTILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY: $133,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $115,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $58,961 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCalled to Compete Inc: $52,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE: $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc: $40,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREAM HUNT FOUNDATION INC: $30,014 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS: $30,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetREDEEMING LIFE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetRISE ADVENTURES INC: $23,974 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHEROES FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPERFECT 33 FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHRISTIAN HERITAGE CHILDREN'S HOME: $16,545 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCADDIES FOR KIDS: $12,250 over 3y, 1.9% of budget22KILL: $12,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOMAHA STREET SCHOOL: $11,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSacramento Police Canine Association: $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FINLEY PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWE CAN DO THIS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetCROSSROADS CORRAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetRENEWED VALOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION: $8,676 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN BIKE KITCHEN: $5,473 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMIDWEST YOUCAN FOUNDATION INC % MEGAN BUSING: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetThe TREE of North Texas: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUNTER HD HOGAN FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetAngel Heart Farm Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTEAM JACK FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISHING HAS NO BOUNDARIES INC: $2,392 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFIRESPRING FOUNDATION: $2,060 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetShe Is More Than Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Fou…D F Dillon FoundationSpreetail FoundationBettenhausen Family F…Assurity Life Foundat…Moeller Charitable Tr…The Hampton Family Fo…Abel FoundationFirespring FoundationRogers FoundationThe Hawks FoundationNebraska Community Fo…
Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE26.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · D F Dillon Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · Bettenhausen Family Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · Moeller Charitable Trust · The Hampton Family Foundation · Abel Foundation · Firespring Foundation · Rogers Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Git-R-Done Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Git-R-Done Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Git-R-Done’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home