How much did THE GIT-R-DONE FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Health$680kReligion$299kHuman Services$124kInternational$88kYouth Development$88kHousing & Shelter$46kCommunity Improvement$25kEducation$12kPublic Benefit$10kOther$549k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

hope

2020

—

2021

—

2022

haylincolnkids

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k17 grants · $96k
$10k–50k19 grants · $284k
$50k–250k1 grant · $56k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

BRYAN FOUNDATION$56,250
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$40,000
STILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY$30,000
KINGDOM SPORTS$26,000
DREAM HUNT FOUNDATION$20,014
CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS$20,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$16,000
RISE ADAPTIVE SPORTS$11,974
CLINIC WITH A HEART$10,358
CROSSROADS CORRAL$10,000
WE CAN DO THIS$10,000
HEROS FOR CHILDREN$10,000
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER$10,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$10,000
WINGS OF HOPE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.4M · 21 repeat orgs$558k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.4M

$378k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%

+39%

Still filing today

67%

35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthInternationalReligionYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CW
CLINIC WITH A HEART
4× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +17%
SW
STILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY
4× · 2018–2024 · $103k · revenue +31%
FO
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
2× · 2022–2024 · $78k · revenue +99%

Funded once

YF
YOUTH FOR CHRIST
one grant, 2022 · $50k
GM
GUNDERSEN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $40k
KS
KINDOM SPORTS
one grant, 2022 · $26k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Christs Hope U S a Inc

Empowering orphaned and vulnerable children to break the cycles of extreme poverty, AIDS, and spiritual brokenness through family-based care and discipleship in Jesus Christ.

Human Services

Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is a Christian-based nonprofit organization that exists to rescue the next generation from hurt and trauma. We fulfill this mission by providing a 1) comprehensive , long-term residential therapeutic program for…

Education

Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ-centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture

Chariots for Hope Inc

Chariots for hope shares the hope of christ by loving kenyan children through christian discipleship and long-term physical, emotional, and educational care and provision. the vision of chariots for hope is to create a transformed future…

International

Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill exists that homeless children and adults receive food and shelter with compassion, hear the good news of jesus christ, and move toward healthy relationships and stability.

Human Services

Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—

Hearts for Families Inc

To strengthen families and those who serve familes

Human Services

Place of Hope Inc

Place of hope is dedicated to providing a stable and loving family environment for children who are hurting and their families. we are committed to meeting desperate needs in our community by sharing god's love and placing hope in their…

Human Services

His House Inc

His house children's home is a faith-based organization that restores the lives of children and families.

—

Operation Finally Home

To provide home and home modifications to america's military heroes, first responders and their families.

Housing & Shelter

The Cooper House Inc

The Cooper House exists to foster hope for families by providing support and encouragement in their time of crisis, while sharing the love and hope of Jesus Christ.

Human Services

Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Omaha Home for Boys and the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Community Playhouse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 25. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/41

the rest of the field

925/14,071

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

35/38

Grantees still filing

26/38

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$680,088Other$595,886Religion$299,440Human Services$124,077International$88,468Youth Development$87,500Housing & Shelter$45,961

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · D F Dillon Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Rogers Foundation · Bettenhausen Family Foundation · Abel Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE GIT-R-DONE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: RENEWED VALOR INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~36 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 8.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 931781467 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on RENEWED VALOR INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 36 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 76% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Git-R-Done Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Git-R-Done Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE GIT-R-DONE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Git-R-Done Foundation?

More from the funding graph

THE GIT-R-DONE FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Git-R-Done Foundation?

More from the funding graph