Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Git-R-Done Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$436k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$893kReligion$409kRecreation & Sports$223kHuman Services$220kYouth Development$99kInternational$90kHousing & Shelter$79kFood & Nutrition$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $96k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $284k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYAN FOUNDATION$56,250
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$40,000
STILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY$30,000
KINGDOM SPORTS$26,000
DREAM HUNT FOUNDATION$20,014
CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS$20,000
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$16,000
RISE ADAPTIVE SPORTS$11,974
CLINIC WITH A HEART$10,358
HEROS FOR CHILDREN$10,000
MOFFITT CANCER CENTER$10,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS$10,000
WINGS OF HOPE$10,000
CROSSROADS CORRAL$10,000
RENEWED VALOR INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $180k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS: $20k → 10%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%CHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CARES: $2k → 15%DREAM HUNT FOUNDATION: $20k → 20%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $10k → 12%CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS: $10k → 10%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT: $10k → 16%THE FINLEY PROJECT: $5k → 13%DREAM HUNT FOUNDATION: $10k → 20%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $10k → 12%THE FINLEY PROJECT: $5k → 13%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $10k → 14%CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $5k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $5k → 14%MIDWEST YOUCAN FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%CHRISTIAN HERITAGE: $17k → 13%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%WINDSONG EQUITHERAPY: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
DE
KS
TN
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 28 repeat orgs$482k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
36

Total granted

$1.8M
$370k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+16%

Still filing today

75%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $112k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CLINIC WITH A HEART INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $160k · revenue +17%
  • SW
    STILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $133k · revenue +34%
  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    3× · 2022–2024 · $115k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • OY
    OMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +10%
  • GL
    Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +16%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $26k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
2
Chariots for Hope Inc

Chariots for hope shares the hope of christ by loving kenyan children through christian discipleship and long-term physical, emotional, and educational care and provision. the vision of chariots for hope is to create a transformed future…

International
3
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
4
Hope Reins

Hope reins' vision is to inspire true hope and real healing for every child. at our ranch, we pair children and teens experiencing trauma with a rescued horse and mentor to find hope and healing. the free-of-charge individual and group…

Health
5
Children's Hunger Fund

Our mission is to deliver hope to suffering children by equipping local churches for gospel-centered mercy ministry.

International
6
Here to Serve Inc

We believe a child's cancer journey is life-altering for both the child and family. For that reason, the care and support of the family are required to avoid parent(s) from losing their health, home, job, and/or entering into bankruptcy.…

Human Services
7
Hope and Home

Hope & home creates ways for amazing people to change the lives of children in foster care. as a nondenominational christian charity, hope & home trains, certifies, and actively supports foster families across the state of colorado.…

Human Services
8
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
9
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
10
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
11
Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

—
12
Bounce Children's Foundation

Bounce children's foundation transforms the lives of chronically ill children, and their families, shifting all from surviving to thriving.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heroes for Children and the most unlike its peers is Sacramento Police Canine Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Missionary Organi…Veteran Support ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Fallen First Responder Supp…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Cancer Support OrganizationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChild and Family ServicesCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 25. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number15%8%<5yr10%4%5–10yr19%37%10–20yr15%22%20–35yr17%16%35–55yr24%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value15%2%<5yr10%4%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr15%21%20–35yr17%7%35–55yr24%42%55yr+

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/57
the rest of the field
8%
1,067/14,055

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/54
Grantees still filing
30/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Bryan Foundation — $425,230 · HealthBryan FoundationCLINIC WITH A HEART INC — $160,358 · HealthCLINIC WITH A HEART INCSTILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY — $133,000 · HealthSTILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMYGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc — $40,100 · Health+5 more — $47,500 · Health+5 moreBACK TO THE BIBLE — $369,440 · ReligionBACK TO THE BIBLEREDEEMING LIFE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC — $30,000 · ReligionREDEEMING LIFE OUTRE…Individual grant recipient — $32,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…Individual grant recipient — $26,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…HEROES FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 · OtherMOFFITT CANCER CENTER — $20,000 · OtherPERFECT 33 FOUNDATION — $19,000 · OtherRISE ADVENTURES INC — $23,974 · OtherOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $20,000 · Other+38 more — $309,897 · Other+38 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP …Called to Compete Inc — $52,000 · Youth DevelopmentCalled to C…OMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentOMAHA YOUTH…CROSSROADS CORRAL INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentDREAM HUNT FOUNDATION INC — $30,014 · Human ServicesDREAM HUNT…THE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST…MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Human ServicesMILITARY W…THE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE OMAHA …CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCHILD PROT…CHRISTIAN HERITAGE CHILDREN'S HOME — $16,545 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN …FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC — $10,500 · Human ServicesCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWE CAN DO THIS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE FINLEY PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Human Services+5 more — $18,563 · Human Services+5 moreWINGS OF HOPE — $45,000 · InternationalHOPE VENTURE — $42,000 · International+2 more — $2,968 · InternationalHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $58,961 · Housing & Shelter
Health$806,188Religion$399,440Other$470,871Youth Development$227,000Human Services$205,622International$89,968Housing & Shelter$58,961

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBryan Foundation — $425,230 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetBACK TO THE BIBLE — $369,440 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetCLINIC WITH A HEART INC — $160,358 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetSTILL WATERS EQUESTRIAN ACADEMY — $133,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $115,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $58,961 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCalled to Compete Inc — $52,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE — $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc — $40,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDREAM HUNT FOUNDATION INC — $30,014 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS — $30,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetREDEEMING LIFE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPREGNANCY CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetRISE ADVENTURES INC — $23,974 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEROES FOR CHILDREN — $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPERFECT 33 FOUNDATION — $19,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHRISTIAN HERITAGE CHILDREN'S HOME — $16,545 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCADDIES FOR KIDS — $12,250 over 3y, 1.9% of budget22KILL — $12,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOMAHA STREET SCHOOL — $11,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC — $10,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN CHILDREN'S ZOO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRENEWED VALOR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 76% of budgetCROSSROADS CORRAL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCHRIST'S STARFISH FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetAUSTIN HATCHER FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWE CAN DO THIS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE FINLEY PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSacramento Police Canine Association — $10,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS FOUNDATION — $8,676 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWOMEN'S CARE CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN BIKE KITCHEN — $5,473 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe TREE of North Texas — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMIDWEST YOUCAN FOUNDATION INC % MEGAN BUSING — $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetAngel Heart Farm Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTEAM JACK FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHUNTER HD HOGAN FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetNEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFISHING HAS NO BOUNDARIES INC — $2,392 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFIRESPRING FOUNDATION — $2,060 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARES INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetShe Is More Than Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Fou…D F Dillon FoundationSpreetail FoundationBettenhausen Family F…Assurity Life Foundat…Moeller Charitable Tr…The Hampton Family Fo…Abel FoundationFirespring FoundationRogers FoundationThe Hawks FoundationNebraska Community Fo…
Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE26.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · D F Dillon Foundation · Spreetail Foundation · Bettenhausen Family Foundation · Assurity Life Foundation · Moeller Charitable Trust · The Hampton Family Foundation · Abel Foundation · Firespring Foundation · Rogers Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Git-R-Done Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines