Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gillette Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$305k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$132k
Largest
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$522kHuman Services$512kReligion$168kArts & Culture$104kHealth$34kRecreation & Sports$29kFood & Nutrition$25kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $132k
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOODLYFE$131,911
Individual grant recipient$36,761
GARDEN ISLAND MOTORCYCLE CLUB$25,000
NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER$25,000
KAUAI CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$22,616
STAND OUT MINISTRIES$20,000
GODS LOVE COVENANT CHURCH$13,930
POINT ONE VISION$13,000
NATIONAL C&MA ALLIANCE$6,000
BARNABAS PROJECT$5,500
RAPAHOPE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $25k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $25k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $23k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $22k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $21k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $2k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $2k → 13%NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
CA
CO
NC
HI
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 17 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$1.8M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-7%

Still filing today

29%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public Safety & DisasterEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    ULTIMATE HAWAIIAN TRAIL RUN FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $517k · revenue +91%
  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +42%
  • AA
    ALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • PF
    PEOPLE FOR CARE AND LEARNING
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -9%
  • DF
    DANCERLOVE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +186%
  • PT
    Pathway to Fitness
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Divine Healing Ministries of Ga

It is a ministry of God focused on teaching the Word of God to the people.

Health
2
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
3
Temple Fit Health Llc

Provide faith-based health empowerment

Religion
4
Work Hard Praise Hard

Educate, teach and motivate individuals to eat and exercise to stay healthty.

Community Improvement
5
CrossTraining Ministry of Pilot Mountain
Religion
6
Hands Across Decatur Inc

Homeless prevention outreach

Human Services
7
Decatur House of Prayer

Dhop is a city wide prayer and worship ministry led by christians across generations and church denominations. we believe in ministering to the lord in worship and partnering with him in prayer to see his kingdom come here in decatur,…

Religion
8
Bibles and Bikes
Youth Development
9
Sugar Run 5K

Diabete Awarness

Health
10
Daily Transformation

Promote healthy spiritualty

Religion
11
Seek Serve Save

Empower missionary movements

Human Services
12
Whole World Ministries

Train&equip leaders for churchs

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighborhood Christian Center of Al; the most unlike its peers is Garden Island Motorcycle Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOODLYFE: $353,296 · OtherGOODLYFEIndividual grant recipient: $332,019 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGODS LOVE COVENANT CHURCH: $95,655 · OtherGODS LOVE COVENANT CHURCHNATIONAL C&MA ALLIANCE: $62,500 · OtherNATIONAL C&MA ALLIANCEVARIOUS: $60,449 · OtherVARIOUSIndividual grant recipient: $43,195 · OtherTHE FILM POETS LLC: $41,686 · OtherPoint One Vision: $38,500 · Other+10 more: $103,416 · Other+10 moreULTIMATE HAWAIIAN TRAIL RUN FOUNDATION INC: $517,383 · Youth DevelopmentULTIMATE HAWAIIAN TRAIL RUN FOU…NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL: $119,750 · Human ServicesDECATUR MORGAN HOSPITAL: $27,000 · HealthDANCERLOVE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthPEOPLE FOR CARE AND LEARNING: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $2,500 · Public Safety & DisasterGARDEN ISLAND MOTORCYCLE CLUB INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsStand Out Ministries: $20,000 · ReligionALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC: $6,728 · EducationPathway to Fitness: $5,000 · Education
Other$1,130,716Youth Development$517,383Human Services$119,750Health$32,000Public Safety & Disaster$27,500Recreation & Sports$25,000Religion$20,000Education$11,728

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetULTIMATE HAWAIIAN TRAIL RUN FOUNDATION INC: $517,383 over 5y, 17% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL: $119,750 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetPoint One Vision: $38,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetDECATUR MORGAN HOSPITAL: $27,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetPEOPLE FOR CARE AND LEARNING: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetStand Out Ministries: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC: $6,728 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPathway to Fitness: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ULTIMATE HAWAIIAN TRAIL RUN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL ↗
  • Who funds Point One Vision ↗
  • Who funds DECATUR MORGAN HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR CARE AND LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds Stand Out Ministries ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA ALLIANCE FOR CHRISTIAN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCERLOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pathway to Fitness ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO3.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gillette Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gillette Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gillette Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gillette Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gillette Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph