Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$11MCommunity Improvement$2.9MRecreation & Sports$2.5MYouth Development$1.6MPublic Benefit$1.2MReligion$215kArts & Culture$210kHuman Services$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $756
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $295k
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.2M
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND$2,200,000
NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS$746,768
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL OHIO$250,000
THE HILL SCHOOL$100,000
CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE$95,000
LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION$50,000
LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION$50,000
PARROCHIA DI SAN JACOPO$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ESCUOLA DI MUSICALE DI CASCIA$10,000
CITY OF NEWARK$756
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE HILL SCHOOL: $100k → 7%THE ISLAMORADA FOUNDATION: $65k → 13%CHRISTIAN CITY: $25k → 13%GRANVILLE ATHLETIC COMPLEX FUND: $300k → 10%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $50k → 15%THE HILL SCHOOL: $100k → 7%GRANVILLE ATHLETIC COMPLEX FUND: $250k → 10%THE HILL SCHOOL: $100k → 7%GRANVILLE ATHLETIC COMPLEX FUND: $250k → 10%GRANVILLE ATHLETIC COMPLEX FUND: $250k → 10%GRANVILLE RECREATION DISTRICT: $50k → 10%DENISON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NEWARK: $1.3M → 10%CITY OF NEWARK: $901k → 10%NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $600k → 10%CITY OF NEWARK: $246k → 10%LOOK UP CENTER: $150k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $138k → 10%NEWARK SPORT AND EVENT COMMISSION: $125k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $116k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 10%NEWARK HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC DEPT: $100k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $95k → 10%NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $75k → 10%CITY OF NEWARK: $73k → 10%MOUND CITY LITTLE LEAGUE: $60k → 10%MOUND CITY LITTLE LEAGUE: $60k → 10%MOUND CITY LITTLE LEAGUE: $50k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE OF CENTRAL OHIO: $50k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $50k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $50k → 10%NEWARK CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $50k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $50k → 10%FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY: $30k → 10%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%LICKING COUNTY TRANSIT: $25k → 10%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 10%SALVATION ARMY: $25k → 10%NORTH NEWARK LITTLE LEAGUE: $22k → 10%FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY: $20k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $20k → 10%LICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $15k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 10%CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 10%CITY OF PATASKALA: $38k → 10%CITY OF HEATH: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 64% of The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 80%.

The Gilbert Reese Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 15 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
19

Total granted

$19M
$807k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+12%

Still filing today

47%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $275k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10M · revenue +6% · 46% of their budget
  • ND
    NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +755% · 32% of their budget
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC
    2× · 2019–2021 · $1.3M · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • NS
    NEWARK SPORT & EVENT COMMISSIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue +49%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • NH
    NEWARK HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC DEPT
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
2
Greater Cleveland Sports Commission

The mission of the greater cleveland sports commission is to measurably improve the economy of greater cleveland and enrich the community by attracting, creating, managing and enhancing significant sporting and competitive events.

Unclassified
3
The Newark Partnership Inc

The mission of the newark partnership is to build upon newark's distinctive assets as an inclusive and innovative university community in which businesses, community institutions, city residents, and students work together toward the…

Public Benefit
4
Ohio City Incorporated

To develop, preserve, and promote our diverse, historic, urban community as a desirable place to live, work, study, play and worship by: "serving as a catalyst to foster neighborhood relationships that build community thereby creating…

Community Improvement
5
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
6
Newark Ice Hockey Association

The mission of the newark ice hockey association is to teach the youth of central ohio, sportsmanship, fair play, respect for coaches, referees, players and fans through the sport of ice hockey, so that they can continue to be good…

Recreation & Sports
7
Ohio Justice and Policy Center

To create fair, intelligent, redemptive criminal justice systems through zealous client-centered advocacy, innovative policy reform and cross-sector community education.

Civil Rights
8
Digitalc

Empower the people of greater cleveland to achieve success through technology, innovation and connected community.

Community Improvement
9
Club Ohio Soccer Inc

Club ohio soccer is designed and structured to meet the needs of the elite boy's and girl's club soccer player who aspires to play at the highest level of competition. to be successful at the regional and national level, it's necessary to…

Recreation & Sports
10
Diabetes Partnership of Cleveland

Diabetes partnership of cleveland works to provide relevant and sustainable programming, education, resources and supplies to the community in northeast ohio affected by diabetes.

—
11
Newark Midland Theatre Association

To enrich the lives of our audiences today and tomorrow by providing engaging, enjoyable experiences, and serving as an economic and cultural catalyst that thrives financially, and thinks and acts progressively through the support of our…

Arts & Culture
12
Science and Technology Campus Corp

The corporation is formed and organized exclusively for the charitable purpose of advancing, encouraging and promoting the industrial, economic, commercial and civil development of an area to serve as a research park for the common benefit…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newark Development Partners; the most unlike its peers is Islamorada Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND: $10,300,000 · EducationNEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND+2 more: $310,000 · EducationLICKING COUNTY FOUNDATION: $1,316,000 · OtherLICKING COUNTY FOUNDATIONCITY OF NEWARK: $1,231,071 · OtherCITY OF NEWARKGRANVILLE ATHLETIC COMPLEX FUND: $1,050,000 · OtherGRANVILLE ATHLETIC COMPLEX F…CENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $471,043 · OtherCENTRAL OHIO TECHNICAL COLLE…PARROCHIA DI SAN JACOPO: $215,000 · Other+19 more: $871,515 · Other+19 moreNEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $2,800,777 · Community ImprovementNEWARK DEVELOPM…+1 more: $65,000 · Community ImprovementBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC: $1,293,720 · Youth DevelopmentJunior Achievement of Central Ohio Inc: $250,000 · InternationalMOUND CITY LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $170,000 · Recreation & SportsNEWARK SPORT & EVENT COMMISSION: $125,000 · Arts & CultureWEATHERVANE PLAYHOUSE INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY: $50,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$10,610,000Other$5,154,629Community Improvement$2,865,777Youth Development$1,293,720International$250,000Recreation & Sports$170,000Arts & Culture$155,000Food & Nutrition$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND: $10,300,000 over 7y, 46% of budgetNEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS: $2,800,777 over 6y, 32% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC: $1,293,720 over 2y, 19% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL: $300,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJunior Achievement of Central Ohio Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMOUND CITY LITTLE LEAGUE INC: $170,000 over 3y, 49% of budgetNEWARK SPORT & EVENT COMMISSION: $125,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetISLAMORADA FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE OF CENTRAL OHIO: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTHE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChristian City Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEATHERVANE PLAYHOUSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetNorth Newark Little League: $21,850 over 1y, 16% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWARK-GRANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEWARK CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF COLUMBUS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of Central Ohio Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUND CITY LITTLE LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK SPORT & EVENT COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds ISLAMORADA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HOSPICE OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD PANTRY NETWORK OF LICKING COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Christian City Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEATHERVANE PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds North Newark Little League ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK-GRANVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Licking County Foundation IncOH30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Licking County Foundation Inc · Licking Memorial Health Foundation · The Lindorf Family Foundation · First Federal Foundation · Park National Corporation Foundation · The O'Neill Foundation · The Englefield Foundation · Columbus Foundation · Cecil Mauger Charitable Trust · The Patricia R and Herbert J Murphy Foundation · The John and Mary Alford Foundation · Energy Cooperative Roundup Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gilbert Reese Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gilbert Reese Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph