Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Georgetown Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$12kReligion$9kInternational$8kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$4kArts & Culture$1kHealth$1kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Last Mile4D$2,000
American Friends of the ED of Jerus$2,000
GLK Student Fund$1,600
St John's Episcopal Church$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,300
Howard University$1,000
Manna Foodbank$1,000
GoFundMe$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Last Mile4D: $2k → 14%Last Mile4D: $1k → 14%Last Mile4D: $1k → 14%Last Mile4D: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MI
NY
OR
OH
CT
CA
VA
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of The Georgetown Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Georgetown Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27k · 7 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
11

Total granted

$27k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+77%

Still filing today

29%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    6× · 2019–2025 · $7k
  • GS
    GLK Student Fund
    5× · 2019–2025 · $5k
  • LM
    LAST MILE4D
    4× · 2019–2025 · $4k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • ST
    Save the Child Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • KA
    KING'S ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • The School for Ethics and Global Leadershipgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
8
Global Citizens Public Charter School

Global citizens school's mission is to inspire and prepare the next generation or global citizens. we will do this by supporting students, ages 3-11, to reach their full academic and leadership potential in a nurturing learning…

—
9
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
10
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
11
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
12
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is King's Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Last MILE4D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $7,200 · OtherST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCHGLK Student Fund: $5,100 · OtherGLK Student FundAmerican Friends of ED Jerusalem: $4,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of ED JerusalemSave the Child Foundation: $2,000 · OtherSave the Child FoundationCongress for the New Urbanism - DC: $2,000 · OtherCongress for the New Urbanism - DCAmerican Friends of the ED of Jerus: $2,000 · OtherAmerican Friends of the ED of JerusIndividual grant recipient: $1,505 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCleveland Clinic: $1,000 · OtherThe Palestine Museum: $1,000 · Other+4 more: $1,790 · Other+4 moreLAST MILE4D: $4,250 · Human ServicesLAST MILE4DKING'S ACADEMY INC: $2,000 · EducationKING'S ACAD…The School for Ethics and Global Leadership: $1,125 · EducationThe School …THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD …MARTHA'S TABLE INC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TA…MANNA FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD …GOFUNDMEORG: $500 · PhilanthropyMANCHESTER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $250 · Arts & CultureAmerica Walks Inc: $150 · Recreation & Sports
Other$27,595Human Services$4,250Education$4,125Food & Nutrition$4,000Philanthropy$500Arts & Culture$250Recreation & Sports$150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAST MILE4D: $4,250 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKING'S ACADEMY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe School for Ethics and Global Leadership: $1,125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANCHESTER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerica Walks Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAST MILE4D ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds KING'S ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds The School for Ethics and Global Leadership ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds MANCHESTER MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds America Walks Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Georgetown Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Georgetown Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Georgetown Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Georgetown Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Georgetown’s filings →

    More from the funding graph