Skip to content

· Public charity

The George W Bush Foundation

The following are the purposes for which the corporation is organized as set forth in the certificate of formation: the purposes for which the corporation is organized are (I) to endow a presidential archival depository, as defined by section 2101(1) of title 44 of the united states code annotated, in an amount required by subsection (g)…

$1.5M
Granted FY2023
47
Grants FY2023
23
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

99% of The George W Bush Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Communities Foundation Of Texas Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The George W Bush Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 46 organizations, $799k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

130
’17
23
’18
8
’19
3
’20
11
’21
44
’22
46
’23
1
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$5.5MInternational$1.3MPhilanthropy$1.0MSocial Science$78kHealth$40kPublic Benefit$10kYouth Development$7kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2023 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 47 grants below total $798,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,509,440 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $710,940 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $740k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$711M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT$50,000
RIO GRANDE CITY CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$45,000
CARTWRIGHT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 83$35,000
SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA$30,000
CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$30,000
DEL VALLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$25,000
ANAHEIM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT$25,000
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$25,000
REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J$25,000
CARSON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
CHANNELVIEW ISD$20,000
PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
WARE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION$20,000
DONNA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
THREE RIVERS JOSEPHINE COUNTY UNIT JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%REDWOOD ADVENTIST ACADEMY: $50k → 9%HENDERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $70k → 13%TRUE CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $50k → 14%MAURICEVILLE ELEMENTARY: $135k → 14%CHANNELVIEW ISD: $20k → 16%AC BLUNT MIDDLE SCHOOL: $70k → 17%CENTRAL MEDICAL MAGNET HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 19%HULL-DAISETTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $50k → 20%UNITED ISD: $25k → 21%CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $30k → 12%BUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $467k → 14%THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA: $55k → 11%LAURA C SAUNDERS ELEMENTARY: $20k → 15%LANSING SCHOOL DISTRICT: $50k → 16%RIO GRANDE CITY CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $45k → 10%PHARR-SAN JUAN-ALAMO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 16%CLEVELAND HTS-UNIVERSITY HTS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 17%CARTWRIGHT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 83: $35k → 11%ANOVA CENTER FOR EDUCATION: $40k → 9%ANAHEIM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 10%BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY SCHOOL CITY OF ROCHESTER: $20k → 14%LITTLE CYPRESS ELEMENTARY: $135k → 14%ALBUQUERQUE MUNICIPAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 12: $30k → 14%REDMOND SCHOOL DISTRICT 2J: $25k → 15%THREE RIVERS JOSEPHINE COUNTY UNIT JOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 22%CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 13%CARDINAL NEWMAN HIGH SCHOOL: $60k → 9%BOARD OF EDUCATION CITY SCHOOL CITY OF ROCHESTER: $20k → 14%VIDOR MIDDLE SCHOOL: $70k → 14%UPLIFT EDUCATION: $20k → 14%DEL VALLE ISD: $40k → 10%OAK FOREST ELEMENTARY: $60k → 14%BRUNDRETT MIDDLE SCHOOL: $50k → 17%CHARLESTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 12%BUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $800k → 14%OLSEN ELEMENTARY: $50k → 17%SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA: $30k → 14%DEL VALLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25k → 10%PORT ARANSAS HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 17%DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500k → 14%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $1.0M → 14%THOMPSON INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL: $70k → 16%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $260k → 14%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION: $51k → 14%MOORE ELEMENTARY: $75k → 16%COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $28k → 14%GALENA PARK ELEMENTARY: $60k → 16%JOHN H WOODSON JR HIGH SCHOOL: $64k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 33 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
161

Total granted

$2.5M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+47%

Still filing today

3%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.3M · 97% of their budget
  • DS
    Dreyfoos School of the Arts
    2× · 2022–2023 · $85k
  • PI
    Pasadena ISD
    2× · 2017–2018 · $82k

Funded once

  • VI
    VIRGIN ISLANDS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    one grant, 2019 · $508k
  • DE
    DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -58%
  • LC
    LITTLE CYPRESS-MAURICEVILLE CISD
    one grant, 2018 · $270k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
2
The New American Academy Charter School

The new american academy charter school empowers learners and inspires leaders to make this a better world. through our collaborative teacher teams, mastery-based career ladder, and looping cycles, we offer personalized rigorous…

Education
3
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
4
Washington Leadership Academy Public Charter School

Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.

Education
5
Aveson

Aveson is committed to helping all of our students grow as scholars and future leaders. teachers, called advisors, collaborate with students to identify the choices that are best for them as citizens and scholars.

Education
6
Emblaze Academy Charter School

Through rigorous curriculum and high quality instruction, provided within an invested and ambitious school community, emblaze academy charter school prepares all students in grades five through eight to thrive in high school and graduate…

Education
7
Leadership Public Schools

Our mission is to create inclusive, empowering, and college-preparatory experiences that equip students to succeed in college, career, and as leaders in their communities.

Education
8
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
9
Quail Run Primary School Inc

This is a public charter school which empowers students to become accountable for their own educational journey. empowering students to choose their curriculum, under supervision, increases their focus and desire to learn.

Education
10
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
11
Howard University Middle School of Mathematics & Science

The howard university middle school of mathematics and science is the only middle school in the country that is located on the campus of an hbcu. we were chartered by howard university for the express purpose of creating a pipeline for…

Education
12
Hoboken Charter School

The board of trustees of hoboken charter school is committed to upholding and advancing the school's mission of fostering the academic, artistic, personal, and civic growth of its students through learner-centered practices grounded in a…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Collegiate Academies; the most unlike its peers is Bush Global Health Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
16/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $1,266,766 · OtherBUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVEVIRGIN ISLANDS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE: $508,248 · OtherVIRGIN ISLANDS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURELITTLE CYPRESS-MAURICEVILLE CISD: $270,000 · OtherDONATIVOS LEGISLATIVOS (PR GOV): $202,553 · Other+181 more: $3,493,637 · Other+181 moreCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $1,359,750 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDAT…DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationDALLAS ED…ANOVA EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR CONSULTATION INC: $40,000 · EducationANOVA EDU…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · Education+10 more: $110,595 · Education+10 moreThe Rand Corporation: $78,000 · Public Benefit
Other$5,741,204Philanthropy$1,359,750Education$675,595Public Benefit$78,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $1,359,750 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE: $1,266,766 over 2y, 97% of budgetDALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $78,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANOVA EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR CONSULTATION INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGIATE ACADEMIES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKETSHIP EDUCATION WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Methodist University: $8,595 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBSDS INC BROOKSIDE CHARTER SCHOOL: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRENEW - REINVENTING EDUCATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BALTIMORE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BUSH GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ANOVA EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR CONSULTATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GenYOUTH IncorporatedIL126.2× affinity87 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GenYOUTH Incorporated · Round It Up America Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Share Our Strength · Project Lead the Way Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Good Sports Inc · I Car Education Foundation · Action for Healthy Kids · Justin J Watt Foundation Inc · Save the Music Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George W Bush Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George W Bush Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 224 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George W Bush’s filings →

More from the funding graph