Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George Mano Mantis Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$25kHuman Services$14kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$4kEducation$1kCrime & Legal$750International$375Religion$263
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$508
Median grant
4
States reached
$14k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANDLELIGHTERS CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUND$2,502
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$1,276
SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC$1,110
NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$1,068
THREE SQUARE$783
SAFENEST$750
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$508
LAS VEGAS HIGH SCHOOL & JR HIGH SCHOOL$500
ALPHA PROJECT FOR THE HOMELESS$276
FATHER JOES VILLAGES$263
ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION$263
OAK ONCOLOGY AND KIDS$261
ALS OF NEVADA$259
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAKE-A-WISH NEVEDA: $3k → 13%BABY'S BOUNTY: $407 → 13%BABY'S BOUNTY: $250 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36k · 8 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +228% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$36k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+228%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterReligionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +331%
  • JC
    JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $1k · revenue +1%
  • BB
    BABY'S BOUNTY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $657 · revenue +228%

Funded once

  • HH
    HOMELESS HELPERSCARE COMPLEX
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • MN
    MAKE-A-WISH NEVADA
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • HH
    HOMELESS HELPERSCARE COMPLEXBACK TO
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nevada Donor Network Inc

Nevada donor network (the "network") is a federally designated not-for-profit organ, tissue, and eye procurement organization. the network is responsible for the coordination, recovery, and distribution of donated human organs and tissues…

Health
2
Nevada Legal Services Inc

To ensure equal access to justice for low-income nevadans.

Crime & Legal
3
Nevada Children's Foundation Inc

To support programs providing the highest quality service to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. these services include a residential program at eagle valley children's home and a respite program provided in the…

Human Services
4
Northern Nevada Children's Cancer Foundation

The foundation's mission is to enhance the quality of life for children with cancer and their families by providing financial assistance and compassionate support programs while advocating for increased research funds and raising public…

Philanthropy
5
Nurses for Newborns

Nurses for newborns (the organization) is a not-for-profit missouri corporation whose purpose is to provide home-based services to promote the health, safety, and well-being of babies and their families. the organization has two branches…

Human Services
6
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
7
BABY2BABY

Baby2baby provides children in need across the country with diapers, formula, clothing and all the basic necessities that every child deserves.

Unclassified
8
Nevada Community Foundation Inc

Our mission is to steward our donors' charitable giving, now and for generations to come and to provide leadership, vision and impactful community investment for southern nevada.

Philanthropy
9
Nevada Primary Care Association

As nevada's federally designated primary care association, nvpca promotes access to affordable, comprehensive & quality health care for nevada's underserved populations. we support & advocate on behalf of member community health centers,…

Health
10
Northern Nevada Legal Aid

Northern nevada legal aid provides northern nevada's vulnerable populations access to justice, regardless of their ability to pay, to protect their rights, safety and family stability.

Crime & Legal
11
Safe Nest Foundation

Safe nest foundation, inc. was created as a supporting organization to support the important work of safe nest; temporary assistance for domestic crisis, inc., a nevada domestic non-profit corporation ("safe nest"). in furtherance of safe…

Philanthropy
12
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Nevada; the most unlike its peers is American Logistics Aid Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANDLELIGHTERS CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUND: $14,552 · OtherCANDLELIGHTERS CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5,193 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEHOMELESS HELPERSCARE COMPLEX: $5,000 · OtherHOMELESS HELPERSCARE COMPLEXHOMELESS HELPERSCARE COMPLEXBACK TO: $1,411 · Other+10 more: $6,286 · Other+10 moreSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $10,999 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE…MAKE-A-WISH NEVADA: $3,000 · Human ServicesBABY'S BOUNTY: $657 · Human ServicesTHREE SQUARE: $1,924 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $1,033 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,068 · HealthALS UNITED NEVADA: $259 · HealthNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthAMERICAN LOGISTICS AID NETWORK: $375 · Public Safety & DisasterST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC: $263 · Religion
Other$32,442Housing & Shelter$10,999Human Services$3,657Food & Nutrition$2,957Health$1,577Public Safety & Disaster$375Religion$263

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $10,999 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH NEVADA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $1,924 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,068 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $1,033 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBABY'S BOUNTY: $657 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LOGISTICS AID NETWORK: $375 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALS UNITED NEVADA: $259 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BABY'S BOUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LOGISTICS AID NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALS UNITED NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Canarelli Family FoundationNV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Canarelli Family Foundation · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George Mano Mantis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George Mano Mantis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on George Mano Mantis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph