Skip to content
The George and Terry Schreyer Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The George and Terry Schreyer Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$166k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$641kHuman Services$137kHealth$114kReligion$83kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kAnimals$100Other$0
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k5 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $117k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Segerstrom Center for the Arts$67,085
Hoag Hopital Foundation$50,000
Childhelp$25,000
Human Options$20,000
Casa Teresa$2,500
The Music Center$1,000
Wounded Warrior Project$200
Boys Town$100
PBS SoCal$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHILD HELP: $14k → 11%Boys Town: $150 → 12%Wounded Warrior Project: $200 → 14%Boys Town: $100 → 12%Childhelp: $25k → 10%Childhelp: $20k → 10%Childhelp: $10k → 10%Human Options: $20k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $15k → 10%HUMAN OPTIONS: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$881k · 10 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$881k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+38%

Still filing today

100%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Segerstrom Center for the Arts
    6× · 2017–2022 · $594k · revenue +57%
  • HH
    HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $103k · revenue +49%
  • CI
    CHILDHELP INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $69k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • BM
    BETHEL MENNONITE CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $68k
  • TH
    THE HARVESTERS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
4
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
5
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
6
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

—
7
Npr International Operations Inc

Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

—
8
Kaiser Foundation for the Advancement of Integrated Health Care

Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…

Health
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
11
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Segerstrom Center for the Arts: $593,585 · Arts & CultureSegerstrom Center for the ArtsPacific Symphony: $44,000 · Arts & CulturePacific Symphony+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDHELP INC: $68,500 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INCHuman Options Inc: $45,000 · Human ServicesHuman Options I…CASA TERESA INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesCASA TERESA INCSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $8,209 · Human ServicesSTARS AND STRIP…+2 more: $450 · Human ServicesBETHEL MENNONITE CHURCH INC: $68,160 · OtherBETHEL MENNO…THE HARVESTERS INC: $15,000 · OtherTHE HARVESTE…Individual grant recipient: $14,500 · OtherIndividual g…Newport Hairloss Center: $7,435 · OtherNewport Hair…+6 more: $4,350 · OtherHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $103,000 · HealthHOAG HOSPIT…+2 more: $2,000 · HealthTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 · Animals
Arts & Culture$638,585Human Services$137,159Other$109,445Health$105,000Public Safety & Disaster$11,000Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSegerstrom Center for the Arts: $593,585 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $103,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDHELP INC: $68,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHuman Options Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPacific Symphony: $44,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCASA TERESA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTARS AND STRIPES CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $8,209 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEPILEPSY SUPPORT NETWORK OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRED HEN PRESS INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George and Terry Schreyer Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George and Terry Schreyer Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George and Terry Schreyer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home