Skip to content

· Private foundation

The George & Laura Flowers Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$490kPhilanthropy$43kEducation$40kYouth Development$29kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$18kFood & Nutrition$17kCommunity Improvement$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$1,625
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
First United Methodist Church$55,275
Individual grant recipient$10,000
United Way$5,000
Dothan Boys and Girls Club$3,500
Communities of Transformation$3,000
Rotary Foundation$3,000
Salvation Army$2,683
City Hope$2,000
Wiregrass Area Food Bank$1,625
Blayne Hardy Barfield Foundation$1,000
Alabama Network of Family Resource Centers$1,000
Boy Scouts of America$1,000
Friends of the Library$500
Blake Wood Foundation$500
Providence Christian School$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Independence Works: $100 → 11%Alabama Network of Family Resource Centers: $1k → 18%Communities of Transformation: $3k → 19%Communities of Transformation: $1k → 22%Diakonia - Ocean City: $250 → 8%Communities of Transformation: $3k → 19%Communities of Transformation: $2k → 19%Communities of Transformation: $2k → 19%Communities of Transformation: $2k → 19%City Hope: $2k → 17%Southeast Alabama Child Advocacy Center: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
NY
MD
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$660k · 23 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
36

Total granted

$660k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+17%

Still filing today

43%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +74%
  • WA
    WIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +148%
  • BH
    BLAYNE HARDY BARFIELD FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2025 · $6k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • LF
    Love for Lubbers Dorian
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • WF
    Wallace Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Alabama Regional Child Advocacy Center

Provide advocacy services for abused children in Central Alabama.

Crime & Legal
2
Caring for Citizens of Alabama

Social services

Human Services
3
West Alabama Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

To provide a child-focused approach to the intervention, treatment, prevention, and prosecution of child abuse cases. to provide free therapy to child abuse victims and age appropriate awareness in our school systems.

Human Services
4
Wiregrass Pet Rescue & Adoption Center Inc

The wiregrass pet rescue and adoption center is dedicated to creating an exemplary animal shelter and pet adoption and community friendly facility in dothan/houston county, alabama. wprac will provide for the basic needs for domesticated…

Animals
5
Talladega County Child Advocacy Center Inc

Interview facility for child abuse victims.

Human Services
6
West Alabama Food Bank Inc

Our mission is to help alleviate hunger and food insecurity in west alabama.

—
7
Wings Across Alabama

To educate, empower, and improve services for mental health consumers in the state of alabama.

Education
8
Alabama Affordable Housing Association Inc

To promote the common interest of those involved in the development & management of rural multi-family housing.

Community Improvement
9
Hospice of Nw Alabama Inc

The hospice of northwest alabama's primary purpose is to provide health care for terminally ill patients. this care primarily consists of counseling for the patients and their families and nursing care provided in the patient's home and/or…

Human Services
10
Aids Alabama Inc

Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
11
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
12
Baldwin Family Violence Shelter

To operate and maintain a protective shelter for battered and/or abused women, men, and children or those affected by family violence.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alabama Policy Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

First United Methodist Church: $357,479 · OtherFirst United Methodist ChurchHarbor Church: $131,100 · OtherHarbor Church+43 more: $166,877 · Other+43 moreUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $26,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATION: $12,500 · Human ServicesCity Hope: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,270 · Human ServicesALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $1,000 · Human ServicesWIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $600 · Human Services+3 more: $600 · Human ServicesWIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $14,625 · Food & NutritionTURKEYS FROM HEAVEN INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionBLAYNE HARDY BARFIELD FOUNDATION: $5,500 · HealthAlabama Kidney Foundation Inc: $1,000 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $750 · Health+2 more: $350 · HealthTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 · InternationalDOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $3,600 · Environment
Other$655,456Philanthropy$26,500Human Services$17,970Food & Nutrition$16,625Health$8,600International$7,000Environment$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $26,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $14,625 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATION: $12,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6,980 over 4y, 23% of budgetBLAYNE HARDY BARFIELD FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $3,600 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTIME YOUTH DOTHAN INC: $2,595 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCity Hope: $2,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetDOTHAN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC: $1,270 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetEXCHANGE CENTER FOR CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAlabama Kidney Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALABAMA NETWORK OF FAMILY RESOURCE CENTERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWIREGRASS CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIAKONIA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHEAST ALABAMA CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIREGRASS ANGEL HOUSE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDEPENDENCE WORKS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds BLAYNE HARDY BARFIELD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA POLICY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds DOTHAN BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds TIME YOUTH DOTHAN INC ↗
  • Who funds TURKEYS FROM HEAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds City Hope ↗
  • Who funds WIREGRASS HOPE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds DOTHAN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds THE DOTHAN ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCHANGE CENTER FOR CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Alabama Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Paul & Barbara Flowers FoundationAL22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Paul & Barbara Flowers Foundation · Wiregrass Foundation · John H Watson Charitable Foundation · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Coleman Foundation · Newton Family Foundation Inc · Dove Family Foundation · Robert and Carol Flowers Foundation · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Carmax Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George & Laura Flowers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George & Laura Flowers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • Diakonia Inc: 51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The George & Laura Flowers Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The George & Laura Flowers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George & Laura Flowers’ filings →

More from the funding graph