Skip to content
The George a and Tina K Georges Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The George a and Tina K Georges Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$57kReligion$45kArts & Culture$12kPhilanthropy$5kHealth$5kInternational$4kFood & Nutrition$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$105
Median grant
9
States reached
$71k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANNUNCIATION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$8,000
FULTON THEATRE$1,705
LANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB$605
ARM OF HOPE$595
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE$300
THE MLK JR MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FD$263
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LANCASTER$263
Individual grant recipient$256
ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN MISSION CENTER$250
HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY CARE$232
Individual grant recipient$210
Individual grant recipient$200
UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDA$200
INTERNATIONAL ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN$200
THE PHILOPTOCHOS SOCIETY$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%THE CHAD TOUGH FOUNDATION: $52 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $25 → 14%HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY CARE: $232 → 9%HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY CARE: $181 → 9%POWER PACKS PROJECT: $158 → 9%HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY CARE: $157 → 9%POWER PACKS PROJECT: $155 → 9%HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY CARE: $150 → 9%OFF THE STREETS: $105 → 9%HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY CARE: $105 → 9%HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY CARE: $105 → 9%POWER PACKS PROJECT: $105 → 9%OFF THE STREETS: $105 → 9%OFF THE STREETS: $105 → 9%OFF THE STREETS: $105 → 9%OFF THE STREETS: $105 → 9%POWER PACKS PROJECT: $100 → 9%POWER PACKS PROJECT: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 46 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
47

Total granted

$129k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+29%

Still filing today

61%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $733 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ARM OF HOPE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +77%
  • LC
    LANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +89%
  • UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • FO
    Fields of Hope Ministries
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • SC
    STS CONSTANTINE & HELEN GREEK
    one grant, 2023 · $750
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2020 · $325
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
7
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
8
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
9
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
10
Lancaster General Health

Provides managerial and financial support to its controlled organizations and is also responsible for undertaking activities designed to advance the general health of the community.

Health
11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster General Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Off the Streets Middletown Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/49
Grantees still filing
38/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,050 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYANNUNCIATION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $40,856 · OtherANNUNCIATION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH+63 more: $19,228 · Other+63 moreFULTON THEATRE COMPANY: $11,127 · Arts & CultureFULTON THEA…ARM OF HOPE INC: $2,335 · Arts & CultureARM OF HOPE…+5 more: $605 · Arts & CultureFields of Hope Ministries: $5,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $125 · PhilanthropyMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $1,257 · HealthUNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDATION: $1,205 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $325 · HealthA WOMAN'S CONCERN INC: $300 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $270 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $128 · Health+4 more: $255 · HealthLANCASTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,411 · EducationSIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION: $475 · EducationELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $315 · EducationWIDENER UNIVERSITY: $300 · EducationTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $100 · EducationCHOICES HEALTHCARE: $930 · Human ServicesPOWER PACKS PROJECT: $618 · Human ServicesOFF THE STREETS MIDDLETOWN INC: $525 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $125 · Human Services+1 more: $52 · Human ServicesINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $675 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $487 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA: $315 · InternationalCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $250 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $85 · International+1 more: $56 · International
Other$110,134Arts & Culture$14,067Philanthropy$5,125Health$3,740Education$2,601Human Services$2,250International$1,868

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFULTON THEATRE COMPANY: $11,127 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetARM OF HOPE INC: $2,335 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB: $1,589 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,411 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $1,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $1,257 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDATION: $1,205 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHOICES HEALTHCARE: $930 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $871 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC: $675 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER PACKS PROJECT: $618 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOFF THE STREETS MIDDLETOWN INC: $525 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $487 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION: $475 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA: $315 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY: $315 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRHEEMS FIRE COMPANY INC: $300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA WOMAN'S CONCERN INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWIDENER UNIVERSITY: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $270 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LANCASTER COUNTY: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $206 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LANCASTER INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $128 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEPHRATA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAEVIDUM: $105 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMILANOF-SCHOCK LIBRARY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONE RIDGE FOUNDATION NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHY VETERANS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE PURSUITS ACADEMY: $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $85 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THIRST PROJECT: $56 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHADTOUGH DEFEAT DIPG FOUNDATION: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEFF MUSSER FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORTHODOX CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNON ORGANIZATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANDREW MCDONOUGH B FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLancaster Medical Heritage Musuem: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FULTON THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Fields of Hope Ministries ↗
  • Who funds ARM OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY FOOD HUB ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF LANCASTER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED DISABILITIES SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHOICES HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds POWER PACKS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds OFF THE STREETS MIDDLETOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds SIGMA KAPPA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETHTOWN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds RHEEMS FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds A WOMAN'S CONCERN INC ↗
  • Who funds WIDENER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lancaster County Comm…High FoundationClark Associates Char…Armstrong World Indus…Ppl FoundationFulton Family Foundat…The Abigail L Longene…Willis and Elsie Shen…High FoundationWilliam and Jemima Br…City Limits FoundationFerree Foundation
Lancaster County Community FoundationPA43.5× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lancaster County Community Foundation · High Foundation · Clark Associates Charitable Foundation · Armstrong World Industries Fndtn · Ppl Foundation · Fulton Family Foundation · The Abigail L Longenecker Memorial Foundation · Willis and Elsie Shenk Foundation · High Foundation · William and Jemima Brossman Charita Charitable Foundation · City Limits Foundation · Ferree Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The George a and Tina K Georges Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The George a and Tina K Georges Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George a and Tina K Georges’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home