Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gdr Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$339kReligion$68kHealth$48kRecreation & Sports$12kEnvironment$5kCrime & Legal$5kYouth Development$2kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$841k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AIM PREGNANCY HELP CENTER$3,000
VAGABOND MISSIONS$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 43% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%THE HOYT FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 17%Pregnancy Solutions: $1k → 9%Pregnancy Solutions: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WI
NY
MA
OH
CA
VA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of The Gdr Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Gdr Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$457k · 12 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$457k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+16%

Still filing today

67%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationReligionYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $325k · revenue +36%
  • MT
    MISSION TO THE BELOVED
    4× · 2019–2022 · $54k · revenue +67%
  • VM
    VAGABOND MISSIONS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +509%

Funded once

  • HF
    HIVE FIVES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • HF
    Hives Fives Foundation
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SL
    SEA LEGACY BLUE SPHERE FOUDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
3
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
4
Catholic Investment Services Inc

To promote socially responsible investments in accordance with socially responsible investment guidelines published by the roman catholic bishops of the united states for institutions, provide education about socially responsible investing…

Public Benefit
5
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
6
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
7
Franciscan Community Benefit Services

MISSION - TO celebrate life and serve with joy. Vision - to provide access to Catholic high schools and offer programs for higher education and career readiness for young women from the Chicago area.

Religion
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
9
Vitalant

Unite blood and biologics donors, talent, and innovation to save and improve lives.

Health
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Osf Healthcare Foundation

OSF Healthcare Foundation's mission is to develop and implement fund raising strategies to generate contributions from the public in support of the various activities and projects of OSF Healthcare System.

Health
12
Oneblood Inc

To enhance the health and well-being of others through our work with blood and stem cell products and by facilitating scientific research

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $325,000 · EducationFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLEAim Pregnancy Help Center: $17,100 · OtherAim Pregnancy …Tech Boston Academy- Boston Educati: $9,000 · OtherTech Boston Ac…HIVE FIVES FOUNDATION: $6,000 · OtherHIVE FIVES FOU…Steubenville Catholic Schools: $5,000 · OtherSteubenville C…Hives Fives Foundation: $5,000 · OtherHives Fives Fo…DISMAS HOME: $4,500 · OtherDISMAS HOMEPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $4,000 · OtherPAN-MASSACHUSE…+12 more: $12,500 · Other+12 moreMISSION TO THE BELOVED: $53,900 · ReligionMISSION TO T…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $11,200 · HealthEMERGING S T A R S: $7,500 · HealthVAGABOND MISSIONS: $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentPREGNANCY SOLUTIONS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesHOYT FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesONLY ONE INC: $3,000 · Environment
Education$325,000Other$63,100Religion$53,900Health$18,700Youth Development$14,500Human Services$3,500Environment$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE: $325,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION TO THE BELOVED: $53,900 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetVAGABOND MISSIONS: $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $11,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGING S T A R S: $7,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetONLY ONE INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPREGNANCY SOLUTIONS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOYT FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
  • Who funds MISSION TO THE BELOVED ↗
  • Who funds VAGABOND MISSIONS ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds EMERGING S T A R S ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ONLY ONE INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds WAVES OF IMPACT ↗
  • Who funds HOYT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CLAREMONT SOUP KITCHEN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gdr Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gdr Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gdr Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Gdr Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gdr Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph