Skip to content
THE GAYLA'S HEART Ps 3418 TRUST at a glance

· Private foundation

THE GAYLA'S HEART Ps 3418 TRUST

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$105k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$479kInternational$77kHuman Services$65kReligion$57kHealth$21kRecreation & Sports$20kEmployment$15kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$45,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,000
nextTalk$45,000
San Antonio Christian School$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%San Antonio Christian School: $100k → 16%Delt Housing Corporation: $5k → 17%CRU MINISTRIES: $19k → 13%Africa New Life: $50k → 8%RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST: $1k → 9%San Antonio Christian School: $100k → 16%CRU MINISTRIES: $16k → 13%Africa New Life: $50k → 8%San Antonio Christian School: $37k → 16%Africa New Life: $50k → 8%San Antonio Christian School: $20k → 16%AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $30k → 8%San Antonio Christian School: $10k → 16%AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $30k → 8%San Antonio Christian School: $10k → 16%AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES: $17k → 8%Community Bible Church Gold Canyon: $17k → 16%Pregnancy Care Center: $20k → 16%BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$806k · 6 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against -38% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$806k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
-38%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentHuman ServicesReligionHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2025 · $277k · revenue +20%
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $202k · revenue +27%
  • AN
    AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    3× · 2018–2020 · $77k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • RR
    RED RAIDER CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • PC
    Pregnancy Care Center
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -43%
  • CB
    Community Bible Church Gold Canyon
    one grant, 2018 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
4
Southwestern Christian College

Its purpose is to offer a holistic educational program that will motivate the student to value and achieve academi excellence within the context of commitment to moral and spiritual values.

Education
5
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
6
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
7
Lubbock Christian University

Lubbock christian university is a christ-centered, academic community of learners, transforming the hearts, minds, and hands of students for lives of purpose and service.

Education
8
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
9
Dallas Theological Seminary

The mission of Dallas Theological Seminary is to glorify God by equipping godly servant-leaders for the proclamation of His Word and the building up of the body of Christ worldwide.

Education
10
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
11
East Texas Baptist University

East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…

Education
12
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bible Study Fellowship; the most unlike its peers is Delt Housing Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $277,129 · OtherSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCRU MINISTRIES: $34,500 · OtherCRU MINISTRIESRED RAIDER CLUB: $20,000 · OtherPregnancy Care Center: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $17,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $202,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $77,000 · EducationAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNAT…NEXTTALK: $65,000 · Human ServicesMDRC: $15,000 · EmploymentDELT HOUSING CORPORATION: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $5,000 · ReligionRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$518,629Education$279,000Human Services$65,000Employment$15,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Religion$5,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $277,129 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $202,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $77,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNEXTTALK: $65,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetPregnancy Care Center: $20,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMDRC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELT HOUSING CORPORATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRETT SYNDROME RESEARCH TRUST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Natl Christian Charit…
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization THE GAYLA'S HEART Ps 3418 TRUST funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from THE GAYLA'S HEART Ps 3418 TRUST. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on GAYLA'S HEART Ps 3418’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home