Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gardiner Adams Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$166kEducation$10kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$3kInternational$2kHealth$2kArts & Culture$1kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$200
Median grant
2
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS$13,275
JORDAN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$3,000
INTERMOUNTAIN FOUNDATION$652
UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION$590
Individual grant recipient$542
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$400
PBS UTAH$330
TO UKRAINE WITH LOVE$300
MILLCREEK CITY$200
COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICES$128
GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$102
KUER$100
HUNTSMAN CANCER INSTITUTE$100
HUNTSMAN CANCER INSTITUTE$100
SALVATION ARMY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%STAND WITH UKRAINE INC: $100 → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $225 → 14%UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $911 → 8%UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $600 → 8%UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $590 → 8%UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $500 → 8%UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $150 → 8%RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE: $100 → 8%UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $100 → 8%RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE: $50 → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $116 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$185k · 16 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
28

Total granted

$185k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
0%

Still filing today

44%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $828 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationCrime & LegalFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JE
    Jordan Education Foundation
    2× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +48%
  • UR
    UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3k · revenue +22%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $3k · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • TO
    The Other Side Academy
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • U6
    UNION 6TH WARD
    one grant, 2023 · $800
  • DR
    DEBT RELIEF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $538
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Real Salt Lake Foundation
Human Services
2
United Way of Central and Southern Utah

We improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our local community to provide resources and programs that focus on health, education, and income.

—
3
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
4
Utah Geological Foundation
—
5
Salt Lake American

Serving refugees living in Salt Lake County who are unable to communicate in English and do not know how to navigate the system on-call 24-7 provided free a language interpreter and guidance through the system also help during weekday…

Religion
6
Skilled Sos

The objective of this organization is to help students and workers make better career, education and finance decisions. With the influx of Afghan refugees in the USA, there is a need for resettlement assistance as well as a unique position…

Employment
7
The Christmas Box International

The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…

Community Improvement
8
Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc

We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care

Human Services
9
Utah Valley Refugees Inc

Utah valley refugee mission is to assist refugees in utah in their quest to become self reliant. the organization accomplishes its mission by providing employment & housing assistance, education grants, esl skills,and healthcare services.…

Philanthropy
10
Utahns Against Hunger

Our mission is to increase access to food across utah through advocacy, outreach, and education. utahns against hunger is utahs only state-wide anti-hunger non-profit organization working on public policy and advocacy for federal nutrition…

—
11
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
12
Family Promise - Salt Lake

We help families experiencing homelessness find lasting independence and security.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Refugee Connection; the most unlike its peers is Bonneville Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $141,077 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSLDS CHURCH: $23,300 · OtherLDS CHURCH+36 more: $16,642 · Other+36 moreThe Other Side Academy: $5,000 · Crime & LegalUTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $2,851 · Human ServicesTHE ROAD HOME: $361 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $225 · Human ServicesRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $150 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesJordan Education Foundation: $3,120 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $200 · EducationInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,565 · International+1 more: $25 · InternationalThe Community Foundation of Utah: $100 · PhilanthropyBONNEVILLE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $100 · PhilanthropyRISE UP SCHOOL OF DANCE: $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$181,019Crime & Legal$5,000Human Services$3,687Education$3,320International$1,590Philanthropy$200Arts & Culture$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Other Side Academy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJordan Education Foundation: $3,120 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION: $2,851 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $2,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,565 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $1,102 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $361 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $225 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISE UP SCHOOL OF DANCE: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Community Foundation of Utah: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStand With Ukraine Inc dba To Ukraine With Love: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUPER BOWL OF CARING INC: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHLINC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Other Side Academy ↗
  • Who funds Jordan Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UTAH REFUGEE CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSION OF SALT LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds Shelter Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds RISE UP SCHOOL OF DANCE ↗
  • Who funds CONSUMER REPORTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family FoundationUT24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Michel Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · Semnani Family Foundation · The Ashton Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gardiner Adams Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gardiner Adams Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gardiner Adams Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Gardiner Adams Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gardiner Adams’ filings →

    More from the funding graph