Skip to content

Utah · Private foundation

Michel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$226k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
22
Grants FY2025
21
Organizations funded FY2024
19%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$72,500
Organizations funded a year
14 to 24
FY2017 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$2.0M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 19% of the organizations Michel Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationInternationalPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving22$226k23%
FY202421$304k19%
FY202324$196k83%
FY202123$129k70%
FY202024$227k63%
FY201914$251k29%
FY201817$144k47%
FY201718$144kn/a
93% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$524kHealth$522kYouth Development$189kEducation$52kHuman Services$50kReligion$34kArts & Culture$19kHousing & Shelter$17kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 36 grantees
All grantees of Michel Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Youthlinc$366,99283%
The Dr Dale B Hull Foundation for Neurological Rehabilitation Inc$243,10053%
Maliheh Free Clinic$116,60035%
Seager Memorial Clinic$114,80538%
Rotary International$39,6173n/a
Crossroads of the West Council Inc Boy Scouts of America 590$38,02541%
Africa Heartwood Project Inc$25,37537%
Rescue Mission of Salt Lake Inc$15,00040%
The Good Samaritan Foundation$15,00022%
Monument of the Americas Inc$6,8481n/a
Columbus Adult Education Center$6,5002n/a
Rise Up School of Dance$5,00012%
Pro-Life Utah$5,00021%
Huntsman Cancer Foundation$4,00020%
Fuller Center for Housing of Cache Valley Inc$4,00021%
Deseret First Charitable Foundation$4,00014%
American Indian Services$3,80310%
Building Blocks in Africa$3,49514%
South Valley Sanctuary Inc$3,00010%
The Other Side Academy$3,00010%
The Hope Alliance$3,00011%
Utah Food Bank$2,56010%
Youth Impact Incorporated$2,5001n/a
Hope After Polygamy$2,5001n/a
Tifie Humanitarian$2,00010%
University of Utah$2,0001n/a
Snow College Foundation$1,00010%
People Helping People Foundation Inc$1,0001n/a
Jordan Education Foundation$1,00010%
Liberty Hills Academy$1,00010%
Kostopulos Dream Foundation$1,00010%
American Heart Association Inc$60020%
Evergreen Freedom Foundation$50010%
Wholives Inc$50010%
Halo Family Services$3001n/a
Utah Rotary Youth Foundation$1501n/a

Plus 54 recipients with no EIN on record ($578k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Michel Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYouthlinc: $366,992 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetThe Dr Dale B Hull Foundation for Neurological Rehabilitation Inc: $243,100 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic: $116,600 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetSeager Memorial Clinic: $114,805 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetCrossroads of the West Council Inc Boy Scouts of America 590: $38,025 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAfrica Heartwood Project Inc: $25,375 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetRescue Mission of Salt Lake Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Good Samaritan Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetRise Up School of Dance: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPro-Life Utah: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHuntsman Cancer Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFuller Center for Housing of Cache Valley Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetDeseret First Charitable Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $3,803 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBuilding Blocks in Africa: $3,495 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSouth Valley Sanctuary Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Other Side Academy: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hope Alliance: $3,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUtah Food Bank: $2,560 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTifie Humanitarian: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSnow College Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJordan Education Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLiberty Hills Academy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKostopulos Dream Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEvergreen Freedom Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWholives Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 27.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sorenson Legacy FoundationUT37.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · C Scott & Dorothy E Watkins Charitable Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · The Gardiner Adams Foundation · The Alan and Jeanne Hall Foundation · Semnani Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Michel Foundation with peer funders

About Michel Foundation

How much does Michel Foundation give?
Michel Foundation reported 22 grants totaling $226,361 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 14 and 24 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.
What does Michel Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are International (32%), Health (32%), Youth Development (12%).
Who are Michel Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Youthlinc ($367k), The Dr Dale B Hull Foundation for Neurological Rehabilitation Inc ($243k), Maliheh Free Clinic ($117k).
Does Michel Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 19% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Michel Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Michel Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sorenson Legacy Foundation, Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation, The Community Foundation of Utah.
Where is Michel Foundation based?
Michel Foundation is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michel’s filings →

More from the funding graph