Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Galt Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$211k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Education$227kYouth Development$165kArts & Culture$111kReligion$58kHuman Services$52kCivil Rights$25k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$22,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUNG LIFE$85,000
CLASSICAL MUSIC INSTITUTE$50,000
LIVE ACTION$25,000
ANY WOMAN CAN$22,000
TOBIN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS$18,000
BASICLICA OF THE LITTLE FLOWER$10,000
UTSA ANNUAL FUND$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ANY WOMAN CAN: $22k → 16%ANY WOMAN CAN: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$285k · 3 repeat orgs$353k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$285k
$299k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureCivil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $165k · revenue +13%
  • CM
    Classical Music Institute CMI
    2× · 2023–2024 · $88k · revenue +48%
  • AW
    ANY WOMAN CAN NP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $32k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • HC
    HILLSDALE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIPS FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • A
    AAPLOG
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • P
    PIONEERS
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chamber Choir of San Antonio

Professional Choir

Arts & Culture
2
Operativo Houston

Providing paid opportunities for Houston based singers.

Arts & Culture
3
American Baroque Opera Company

American baroque opera company operates in the state of texas for the primary purpose of furthering the appreciaton of music, particularly opera, for the general public. american baroque opera company performs select operas throughout the…

Arts & Culture
4
River Oaks Chamber Orchestra

To shape the future of classical music by energizing, modernizing, and personalizing the concert experience.

Arts & Culture
5
San Antonio Philharmonic

See attached statement

Arts & Culture
6
Alamo City Opera

Opera piccola's mission is to create a dynamic, intimate operatic experience, and to inspire our audiences, artists, and community. our artistic mission is to pursue excellence in the presentation of diverse repertoire, through innovative…

7
Bach Cantata Choir

to give concerts of Baroque and Renaissance composers

Arts & Culture
8
The Laredo Philharmonic

Primary exempt purpose is to provide the highest musical performances to engage, enrich and entertain the community with a special emphasis for children and students.

Arts & Culture
9
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture
10
Alamo City Performing Arts Association

Alamo City Performing Arts Association is dedicated to inclusive education in the art of dance, theater and music; in order to help instill and perpetuate a genuine appreciation of the performing arts in our community through educational…

Arts & Culture
11
Soli Chamber Ensemble

SOLI's mission is to cultivate and promote the awareness and appreciation of contemporary classical music through commissioning projects, high-caliber performances, cross-genre collaborations, and engaging educational and outreach…

Arts & Culture
12
California Bach Society Inc

Choral Music Performances: California Bach Society is a 30-voice chamber choir known for finely wrought interpretations of Renaissance and Baroque music, often accompanied by leading period instrumentalists. Each season, the choir performs…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bexar County Performing Arts Center Fdn Tobin Center for the Performing Art and the most unlike its peers is Classical Music Institute Cmi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HILLSDALE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIPS FUND — $200,000 · OtherHILLSDALE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIPS FUNDClassical Music Institute CMI — $87,500 · OtherClassical Music Institute CMIAAPLOG — $25,000 · OtherAAPLOGPIONEERS — $25,000 · OtherPIONEERSSAVE OUR CHILDREN — $20,000 · Other+5 more — $24,500 · Other+5 moreYOUNG LIFE — $165,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEANY WOMAN CAN NP — $32,000 · Human ServicesLIVE ACTION — $25,000 · Civil RightsBEXAR COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FDN TOBIN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ART — $18,000 · EducationREASONS TO BELIEVE — $10,000 · ReligionTHE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN — $5,150 · Arts & Culture
Other$382,000Youth Development$165,000Human Services$32,000Civil Rights$25,000Education$18,000Religion$10,000Arts & Culture$5,150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE — $165,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetClassical Music Institute CMI — $87,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetANY WOMAN CAN NP — $32,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAVE OUR CHILDREN — $20,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetBEXAR COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FDN TOBIN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ART — $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREASONS TO BELIEVE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN — $5,150 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Galt Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph