· Private foundation
The Fritch Foundation U/A Dated 12/4/12
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of The Fritch Foundation U/A Dated 12/4/12’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $133k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WOMEN IN DISTRESS | $25,000 |
| CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY | $23,000 |
| ANN STORCK CENTER INC | $18,000 |
| VICTORY CENTER | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| LEADERSHIP BROWARD FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL | $10,000 |
| MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY & SCIENCE LE DISTRIBUTION | $10,000 |
| STRANAHAN HOUSE MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| ARC BROWARD | $7,500 |
| LUBAVITCH HEBREW ACADEMY | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH FLORIDA | $5,000 |
| BROWARD CENTER FOR THE PERFOMING ARTS | $5,000 |
| TOMORROW'S RAINBOW | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WIWOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $195k · revenue +135%
- ASANN STORCK CENTER INC8× · 2017–2024 · $139k · revenue +77%
- CACANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC8× · 2017–2024 · $126k · revenue +173%
Funded once
- TNTHE NEST STORYTIME NOOKone grant, 2023 · $10k
- JJJESSICA JUNE CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $1k · revenue -6%
- MCMIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC FKA MIAMI YOUTH MUSEUMgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…
To promote the optimal health and wellbeing of children and youth with special health care needs by providing family centered, comprehensive prevention, intervention and treatment services within a medical home environment. our vision is…
The mission of the child protection center, inc. is the prevention, intervention and treatment of child abuse. we envision a community where children are safe from abuse and free to thrive. to successfully address the issue of child abuse,…
Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)
Early learning childcare
Since 1981, children's advocacy center of southwest florida, inc. (cac) has advocated for a healthy, safe community for children through a multidisciplinary team approach to child abuse and neglect. our mission is to create a safe and…
Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.
Childnet's mission is to protect broward and palm beach counties' abused, abandoned and neglected children, to ensure their safety and to promptly provide them with a permanent, loving home.
The mission of the ljd jewish family & community services, inc. is to strengthen the entire community by providing family and individual social services in the jewish tradition of helping people help themselves.
For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…
Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…
A comprehensive, child-friendly facility where professionals from law enforcement, medical, child protection and therapeutic services collaborate to meet the individual needs of child victims and break the cycle of abuse.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Neighbors 4 Neighbors and the most unlike its peers is Tomorrow's Rainbow Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOMEN IN DISTRESS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ANN STORCK CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CANINE ASSISTED THERAPY INC ↗
- Who funds HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Leadership Broward Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BROWARD PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GODS LITTLE ACRES INC ↗
- Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF DISCOVERY AND SCIENCE INC ↗
- Who funds TOMORROW'S RAINBOW INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD RESCUE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds ARC BROWARD INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc ↗
- Who funds KEREN OR INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA'S CHILDREN FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds HENDERSON BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds SLOW BURN THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds JESSICA JUNE CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS 4 NEIGHBORS ↗
- Who funds MIAMI CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC FKA MIAMI YOUTH MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Broward Inc · Bbx Capital Foundation Inc · Florida Panthers Foundation Inc · James & Beatrice Salah Charitable Trust Dtd 08-09-2001 · The William R Watts Fndn Inc · The Harry T Mangurian Jr Foundation Inc · The Amaturo Family Foundation · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Alfred & Rose Miniaci Foundation Inc · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Fritch Foundation U/A Dated 12/4/12 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Child Rescue Coalition Inc — 20% of income from government
- Museum of Discovery and Science Inc — 2% of income from government
- Miami Children's Museum Inc Fka Miami Youth Museum — 0% of income from government
- Ann Storck Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Holy Cross Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- Henderson Behavioral Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Fritch Foundation U/A Dated 12/4/12?
Find your warmest path to The Fritch Foundation U/A Dated 12/4/12 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.