Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Frederick D & Gail y Jubitz Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$315k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$1.7MEducation$394kHealth$253kFood & Nutrition$230kPhilanthropy$95kRecreation & Sports$5kCivil Rights$5kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $270k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORTLAND ART MUSEUM$150,327
PROVIDENCE$70,000
DE LA SALLE CATHOLIC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
PARK ACADEMY$10,000
NAMI OREGON$2,500
CELEBRATION MINISTRIES$2,500
DOUGY CENTER$2,500
OPERA IN THE PARK PORTLAND$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Motiv8 Foundation: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 8 repeat orgs$492k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$2.4M
$407k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+35%

Still filing today

38%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PORTLAND ART MUSEUM
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +3%
  • PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $170k · revenue +258%
  • THE PARK ACADEMY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • BA
    BEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +696%
  • PM
    PROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $80k
  • LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue +35%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

2
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
5
Trustees of Clark University

Clark university's mission is to educate undergraduate and graduate students to be imaginative and contributing citizens of the world, and to advance the frontiers of knowledge and understanding through rigorous scholarship and creative…

Education
6
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
7
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
8
University of Portland

The university of portland, an independently governed catholic university guided by the congregation of holy cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
9
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Lincoln Memorial University

Lincoln memorial university is a values-based learning community dedicated to providing educational experiences in the liberal arts and professional studies.

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Lewis & Clark College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $1,590,226 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND ART MUSEUMBEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureBEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INC+1 more — $25,000 · Arts & CulturePortland Japanese Garden Foundation — $160,000 · OtherPortland Japanese Garden Founda…PROVIDENCE — $150,000 · OtherPROVIDENCEDE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $115,000 · OtherDE LA SALLE NORTH CATHOLIC HIGH…Individual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATIONDE LA SALLE CATHOLIC — $50,000 · OtherDE LA SALLE CATHOLICMCCOLLUM THEATER — $30,000 · Other+11 more — $113,000 · Other+11 moreTHE PARK ACADEMY — $80,000 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE — $60,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION — $42,855 · EducationHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $6,500 · EducationPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $170,000 · Health+1 more — $2,500 · HealthMOTIV8 FOUNDATION INC — $1,750 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$1,715,226Other$798,000Education$199,355Health$172,500Human Services$1,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPORTLAND ART MUSEUM — $1,590,226 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetPROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $170,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTHE PARK ACADEMY — $80,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE — $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION — $42,855 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LINCOLN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF OREGON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI OREGON — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DOUGY CENTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOTIV8 FOUNDATION INC — $1,750 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PORTLAND ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BEAVERTON ARTS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE PARK ACADEMY
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
  • Who funds HORATIO ALGER ASSN OF DISTINGUISHED AMERICANS INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LINCOLN
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF OREGON INC
  • Who funds NAMI OREGON
  • Who funds THE DOUGY CENTER INC
  • Who funds MOTIV8 FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Marcia H Randall Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · Mentor Graphics Foundation · The Reser Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Frederick D & Gail y Jubitz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Nami Oregon10% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College2% of income from government
  • The Dougy Center Inc1% of income from government
  • Portland Art Museum1% of income from government
  • Beaverton Arts Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph