Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fred and Armour Shin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$304k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Religion$101kHealth$76kHuman Services$53kInternational$50kCivil Rights$40kArts & Culture$40kEducation$38kRecreation & Sports$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $231k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Asian American Resource Center Inc$35,000
Burnet Presbyterian Church$33,000
Korean Culture Center of Austin$24,783
Samaritan's Purse$20,000
Down Syndrome Association of S TX$20,000
ICEJ$15,000
Austin Korean Senior Citizens Association$13,000
Salvation Army$10,000
Bridge International Christian Academy$10,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$10,000
AMED Global Arriba Maestros de Escuela$10,000
Turning Point USA$10,000
The Arc of San Antonio$10,000
Mission to World$10,000
Lakes Area Care$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%JOSEPH'S HAMMER: $5k → 13%MEALS ON WHEELS: $3k → 6%Meals on Wheels: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$390k · 22 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
5

Total granted

$390k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

41%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +5%
  • LA
    LAKES AREA CARE INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $13k · revenue +24%
  • AK
    AUSTIN KOREAN SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • AK
    AUSTIN KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • JH
    JOSEPHS HAMMER
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • CB
    CROSSING BORDERS MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atx Helps

ATX Helps was created to fill gaps in the spectrum of services available to people in Austin who are experiencing homelessness.

Human Services
2
Meals On Wheels Ministry Inc

Empowers older and disabled adults to live independentlly in thier own homes by providing nutritious home-delivered meals, safety checks, socialization, and community connection, which result in an enhanced quality of life and purpose as…

Food & Nutrition
3
Julias Center

To respect the welfare and human dignity of all people and to provide health care services to Collin County, Texas adult residents who have little or no access to traditional medical services. In addition to basic medical care for adults…

Health
4
San Antonio Christian Dental Clinic

Sa christian dental clinic's mission is to extend christ's healing by providing charitable dental care to underserved bexar county adults. the vision of the clinic is a commitment to creating a community in which dental care and optimal…

—
5
Grace Community Healthcare Ministry

Grace community healthcare ministry is an independent, faith based non-profit community healthcare organization in mineola, texas, serving the medically underserved residents of the area. following the example of the great physician, the…

Health
6
Lone Star Circle of Care

Lone star circle of care provides exceptional and accessible patient centered healthcare for our texas neighbors, focusing on the underserved.

Health
7
Mary House Catholic Worker of Austin 083198

Provides support to critically ill or physically impaired homeless and indigent individuals in Austin by providing food, shelter, clothing, and other forms of assistance. Also serves as advocate for imprisoned men and women.

—
8
Northwest Austin Universal Health Clinic

Northwest Austin Universal Health Clinic (NAUHC) helps unisured and under-insured adults build healthier, happier lives, and be more productive. Through an innovative patient-focused model of healthcare, NAUHC provides high-quaility…

Health
9
Texas Battered Women's Center Inc

Provide care, assistance, and counseling for abused women. Provide food for needy families.

Human Services
10
Under the Bridge Ministries Inc

We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…

Human Services
11
Grace in Healing Hands

Compassionately serving forgotten overlooked neglected and underserved adults in the Garland and Dallas County area by providing free dental and vision care building trusting relationships and sharing hope.

Health
12
Mission Texarkana Inc

The center is a care provider rendering life sustaining assistance to the indigent and job training and placement for able bodied clients withouth regard to religious preference, political affiliation, sex, race, handicap, or other…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian American Resource Center Inc Austin Asian Community Health Initiative; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
5/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Burnet Presbyterian Church: $61,000 · OtherBurnet Presbyterian ChurchDown Syndrome Association of S TX: $30,000 · OtherDown Syndrome Association of S TXICEJ: $25,000 · OtherICEJST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $25,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITALAustin Korean Senior Citizens Association: $21,000 · OtherAustin Korean Senior Citizens AssociationSalvation Army: $20,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $15,000 · OtherTurning Point USA: $15,000 · OtherLAKES AREA CARE INC: $13,000 · Other+22 more: $121,000 · Other+22 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN…KOREAN CULTURE CENTER OF AUSTIN INC: $39,783 · Arts & CultureAsian American Resource Center Inc Austin Asian Community Health Initiative: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $15,000 · HealthMercy Ships International: $10,000 · InternationalGET UP PROJECT: $5,000 · InternationalMEALS ON WHEELS: $6,000 · Human ServicesJOSEPHS HAMMER: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$346,000Religion$40,000Arts & Culture$39,783Recreation & Sports$35,000Health$15,000International$15,000Human Services$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOREAN CULTURE CENTER OF AUSTIN INC: $39,783 over 2y, 62% of budgetAsian American Resource Center Inc Austin Asian Community Health Initiative: $35,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLAKES AREA CARE INC: $13,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetMercy Ships International: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN KOREAN SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $6,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP: $6,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHILL COUNTRY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJOSEPHS HAMMER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HELPING CENTER OF MARBLE FALLS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGET UP PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN CULTURE CENTER OF AUSTIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Asian American Resource Center Inc Austin Asian Community Health Initiative ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN KOREAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN WOMENS JOB CORP ↗
  • Who funds HILL COUNTRY CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPHS HAMMER ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HELPING CENTER OF MARBLE FALLS ↗
  • Who funds GET UP PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE4.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fred and Armour Shin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fred and Armour Shin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Fred and Armour Shin Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Fred and Armour Shin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fred and Armour Shin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph