Skip to content

California · Private foundation

The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$757k
Granted FY2023
13
Grants FY2023
13
Organizations funded FY2023
31%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Jewish Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $757k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

6
’20
5
’21
9
’22
11
’23
0
’24
0
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2023
$49,800
Largest grant, FY2023
$150,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 13
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2023
4
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 31% of the organizations The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 17% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $131k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
HealthArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202313$757k31%
FY202212$503k25%
FY20218$351k50%
FY20208$95kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.5MArts & Culture$470kHuman Services$447kReligion$365kHealth$134kEducation$63kCivil Rights$10kFood & Nutrition$1k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Seacrest Foundation$360,00044%
San Diego Opera Association$314,64042%
Hillel of San Diego$270,00025%
North Coast Repertory Theatre$150,00032%
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute$110,00010%
Congregation Beth Israel$95,0003n/a
Words Alive$40,00031%
American Heart Association Inc$21,00030%
Future Legends$10,0001n/a
Future Legends$10,00015%
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Seacrest Foundation$360,00044%
San Diego Opera Association$314,64042%
Hillel of San Diego$270,00025%
North Coast Repertory Theatre$150,00032%
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute$110,00010%
Congregation Beth Israel$95,0003n/a
Words Alive$40,00031%
American Heart Association Inc$21,00030%
Future Legends$10,0001n/a
Future Legends$10,00015%
Anti-Defamation League$10,00010%
Home of Guiding Hands Corporation$6,00020%
Uc San Diego Foundation$2,50010%
Caring Community Foundation$1,00011%
Alzheimer's San Diego$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($304k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSeacrest Foundation: $360,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetSan Diego Opera Association: $314,640 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetHillel of San Diego: $270,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetNorth Coast Repertory Theatre: $150,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute: $110,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWords Alive: $40,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFuture Legends: $10,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetAnti-Defamation League: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHome of Guiding Hands Corporation: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUc San Diego Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaring Community Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAlzheimer's San Diego: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of San DiegoCA23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The San Diego Foundation · Leichtag Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Kerr Family Foundation · Allison and Robert Price Family Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Arthur & Barbara Bloom Foundation · The Parker Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation

How much does The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation give?
The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation reported 13 grants totaling $756,800 in its FY2023 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 13 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2023, its largest causes are Philanthropy (51%), Arts & Culture (15%), Human Services (15%).
Who are The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2023: Seacrest Foundation ($360k), San Diego Opera Association ($315k), Hillel of San Diego ($270k).
Does The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 31% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego, The San Diego Foundation, Leichtag Foundation.
Where is The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation based?
The Frank M & Lee Goldberg Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frank M & Lee Goldberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph