How much did THE FRANCES REICHMAN CHARITABLE TRUST grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of THE FRANCES REICHMAN CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k12 grants · $299k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

SHADOW ARTISTS INC$40,000
DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$35,000
QSAC INC$30,000
THIRTEENWNET$30,000
DIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION$25,000
FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY$25,000
JEWISH THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$25,000
BETH MEDROSH F MONSEY$16,000
FRESH AIR FUND$12,500
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL & TOLERANCE CENTER$10,000
KIWANIS OF PARKWAY EAST$9,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 91% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.5M · 22 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.5M

$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%

+27%

Still filing today

36%

17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthInternationalRecreation & SportsArts & CultureEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

QI
QSAC INC
9× · 2017–2025 · $260k · revenue +23%
AN
ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION
9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +30%
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY
5× · 2021–2025 · $115k · revenue +80%

Funded once

OF
ONESTAR FOUNDATION - TEXAS RELIEF FUND
one grant, 2017 · $10k
UF
UJA - FEDERAL DISASTER RELIEF FUND
one grant, 2017 · $10k
UD
UJA DISASTER RELIEF FUND
one grant, 2020 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

American Friends of Torah and Tefilah

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa

Religion

American Friends of Rabbinical College

To support, benefit, and assist yeshivat netiv hadaat- jerusalem a recognized tax exempt religious educational institute.

Education

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center.it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

American Friends of Yeshivat

—

American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion

American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance

Religion

American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel.

Religion

Foundation for Jewish

The organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks, accepts,…

Philanthropy

American Jewish Historical Society

Access to millions of artifacts reflecting the history of the jewish presence in the u.s.

Arts & Culture

B Nai B Rith

The global voice of the jewish community, advancing human rights and community service since 1843.

—

American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra

To raise funds to support the operations and secure the israel philharmonic's financial future.

Arts & Culture

Akiva School

A private jewish day school which provides academic and judaic studies for k-6.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Hebrew. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

5/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,755,900Health$490,000International$187,500Recreation & Sports$92,500Arts & Culture$20,000Education$1,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE FRANCES REICHMAN CHARITABLE TRUST funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 956043953 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Frances Reichman Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Frances Reichman Charitable Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE FRANCES REICHMAN CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Frances Reichman Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph

THE FRANCES REICHMAN CHARITABLE TRUST

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Frances Reichman Charitable Trust?

More from the funding graph