Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Frances and Townsend Burden Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$84kArts & Culture$69kFood & Nutrition$65kPublic Benefit$32kEducation$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kRecreation & Sports$12kPhilanthropy$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$139k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED HEART$10,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
GEORGE WASHINGTON MOUNT VERNON$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
METROPOLITAN CLUB$2,000
FRIENDS OF UNIT 52$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SUPPORTIVE LIVING INC: $10k → 8%THE OPEN DOOR: $8k → 10%ONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE METROPOLITAN CLUB: $4k → 17%METROPOLITAN CLUB: $2k → 14%SMITHSONIAN WOMAN'S COMMITTEE: $2k → 15%LAFAYETTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $3k → 12%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $13k → 9%MOUNT SAINT MARY HOUSE OF PRAYER: $11k → 5%THE UPPER ROOM SPIRITUAL CENTER: $13k → 6%THE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA: $10k → 4%MOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION: $9k → 6%THE MOSBY HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION: $6k → 6%MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION INSTITUTE: $2k → 7%THE VIRGINIA PIEDMONT: $8k → 8%THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%FRIENDS OF UNIT 52: $1k → 8%MISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED HEART: $7k → 11%ZEN CENTER NORTH SHORE: $8k → 10%THE METROPOLITAN CLUB: $3k → 17%METROPOLITAN CLUB: $2k → 14%SMITHSONIAN WOMAN'S COMMITTEE: $2k → 15%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $10k → 9%THE UPPER ROOM SPIRITUAL CENTER: $10k → 6%MOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION: $8k → 6%THE MOSBY HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION INSTITUTE: $1k → 7%THE VIRGINIA PIEDMONT: $8k → 8%THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 12%MISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED HEART: $10k → 11%THE METROPOLITAN CLUB: $3k → 17%UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE: $4k → 14%SMITHSONIAN WOMAN'S COMMITTEE: $2k → 15%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $10k → 9%THE UPPER ROOM SPIRITUAL CENTER: $7k → 6%THE MOSBY HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION: $3k → 6%THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION: $8k → 12%MISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED HEART: $8k → 11%THE METROPOLITAN CLUB: $2k → 17%SMITHSONIAN WOMAN'S COMMITTEE: $2k → 15%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $8k → 9%THE SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%SACRED HEART OF JESUS CHRIST: $13k → 17%SMITHSONIAN WOMAN'S COMMITTEE: $2k → 15%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $8k → 9%SACRED HEART OF JESUS CHRIST: $11k → 17%NORTHWEST HARVEST: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
WI
NY
MA
NJ
CO
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$292k · 13 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$292k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+20%

Still filing today

31%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureReligionEnvironmentHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $33k · revenue +152%
  • VP
    VIRGINIA PIEDMONT HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +38%
  • TM
    THE METROPOLITAN CLUB INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $12k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MS
    MOUNT SAINT MARY HOUSE OF PRAYER
    one grant, 2017 · $11k
  • TL
    THE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +280%
  • SL
    SUPPORTIVE LIVING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Historic Virginia Land Conservancy

Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.

Environment
2
Northern Neck Land Conservancy

Northern neck land conservancy's mission is to preserve the rural heritage of the northern neck and essex county by conserving their lands, water, economies and culture for future generations. the land conservancy assists landowners who…

Environment
3
Virginia Capital Trail Foundation

The virginia capital trail foundation exists to protect, promote, and enhance the virginia capital trail and engage communities around it.

Recreation & Sports
4
Virginia Peninsula Foodbank

To distribute food effectively through collaborative efforts that minimize hunger, promote nutrition and encourage self-reliance through education.

Food & Nutrition
5
Virginia Association of Museums

The virginia association of museums is a statewide network serving the museum community. the association's mission statement is "the virginia association of museums helps our museum community succeed".

Arts & Culture
6
Land Trust of the Treasure Valley

To create oppurtunites for conservation of natural, scenic, historic, recreational and agricultural values of southwestern idaho's open spaces through collabarative efforts for current and future generations. the land trust indentifies…

Environment
7
Virginia War Memorial Foundation Inc

To promote and raise funds for the virginia war memorial, a state agency of virginia, which was created for the purpose of honoring patriotic virginians who rendered faithful service and sacrifice in the cause of freedom and liberty for…

Arts & Culture
8
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
9
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
10
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
11
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
12
Feeding Southwest Virginia

To provide food and other related products primarily to member agencies for distribution to those in need, and also for direct distribution.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Open Door Cape Ann Food Pantry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Zen North Shore. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $57,000 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMIndividual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE UPPER ROOM SPIRITUAL CENTER: $29,500 · OtherTHE UPPER ROOM SPIRITUAL CENTERGEORGE WASHINGTON MOUNT VERNON: $25,000 · OtherGEORGE WASHINGTON MOUNT VERNONMISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED HEART: $24,500 · OtherMISSION HELPERS OF THE SACRED HEARTSACRED HEART OF JESUS CHRIST: $24,000 · OtherSACRED HEART OF JESUS CHRISTMOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATION: $17,000 · OtherMOUNT VERNON LADIES ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE METROPOLITAN CLUB INC: $12,000 · OtherMOUNT SAINT MARY HOUSE OF PRAYER: $11,000 · Other+7 more: $28,000 · Other+7 moreSHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION: $33,000 · Arts & CultureSHENANDOAH VAL…VIRGINIA PIEDMONT HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION: $14,000 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA PIEDM…ONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentSUPPORTIVE LIVING INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterZEN NORTH SHORE: $8,000 · Religion
Other$277,000Arts & Culture$47,000Philanthropy$12,000Environment$10,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Religion$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $57,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetVIRGINIA PIEDMONT HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION: $14,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetTHE METROPOLITAN CLUB INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSUPPORTIVE LIVING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH VALLEY BATTLEFIELDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA PIEDMONT HERITAGE AREA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE METROPOLITAN CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LAND TRUST OF VIRGINIA INC ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORTIVE LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds ZEN NORTH SHORE ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Frances and Townsend Burden Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Frances and Townsend Burden Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • The Open Door Cape Ann Food Pantry Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Supportive Living Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Frances and Townsend Burden Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Frances and Townsend Burden Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Frances and Townsend Burden’s filings →

More from the funding graph