Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Floy L and Paul F Cornelsen Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$427k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$975kHuman Services$942kPhilanthropy$300kHealth$208kReligion$177kYouth Development$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $392k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
VILLA DUCHESNE AND OAK HILL SCHOOL$100,000
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY$100,000
ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$92,000
THE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $185k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $60k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $50k → 11%HOME SWEET HOME: $50k → 11%LOAVES & FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 14 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$3.1M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+32%

Still filing today

36%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $300k · revenue +300%
  • DePauw University
    4× · 2022–2025 · $275k · revenue +33%
  • HS
    HOME SWEET HOME
    3× · 2019–2022 · $160k · revenue +395%

Funded once

  • MM
    MINISTRY MENTORS PILOT PROGRAM EXPANSION
    one grant, 2018 · $27k
  • DB
    DAKOTA BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +14%
  • LA
    LOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +78%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lutheran Family and Children's Services Foundation

To promote positive change for missouri's children and families by supporting the operations of lutheran family and children's services of missouri in the communities they serve.

Philanthropy
2
Good Shepherd Children & Family Services

Connecting children with families and keeping families connected by providing pregnancy and parenting support, foster care programs and adoption services.

—
3
Our Little Haven

Our little haven's primary purpose is to assess, treat and heal the youngest victims of child abuse and neglect and those children suffering from mental health issues. our little haven's treatment provides a community based, early…

—
4
Lutheran Social Services of the South Inc

Our mission is to break the cycle of child abuse by empowering children, families and communities.

Human Services
5
Jewish Family Services of St Louis

Inspired by the jewish tradition to make the world a better place, jfs helps and supports people in need to meet their challenges. through a comprehensive range of services, including a food pantry, older adult services, clinical services,…

Human Services
6
Lutheran Counseling and Family Services

Lutheran counseling and family services of wisconsin provides faith-based mental health counseling, family life education and adoption services.

Human Services
7
Lutheran Child and Family Services of Illinois

Lutheran child and family services of illinois (agency) is a nonprofit statewide social service agency whose mission is to attract, develop, mobilize, and prvoide resources to improve the well-being of children, individuals, families,…

—
8
St Louis Life

To enable individuals with developmental disabilities to achieve the highest level of independent living and live a full and enriched life.

Housing & Shelter
9
Children's Home Society of Missouri

The agency's overarching philosophy is based in the neurosequential model of therapeutics (nmt), developed by dr. bruce perry. nmt is a trauma-informed, developmentally sensitive approach to understanding the impact of a child's history on…

Human Services
10
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
11
Little City Foundation

To ensure that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities are provided with the best options and opportunities to live safely, work productively, explore creatively, learn continuously and play pleasurably throughout their…

Human Services
12
Lutheran Child and Family Services of in/Ky Inc

Engaging and empowering families and community with love, compassion, faith, and support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foster Care Coalition of Greater St Louis; the most unlike its peers is The Mighty Oakes Heart Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VILLA DUCHESNE - OAK HILL SCHOOL: $600,000 · OtherVILLA DUCHESNE - OAK HILL SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMiriam Foundation Endowment Fund: $300,000 · OtherMiriam Foundation Endowment FundFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $300,000 · OtherFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUISDEPAUW - HUBBARD CENTER PROGRAMS: $300,000 · OtherDEPAUW - HUBBARD CENTER PROGRAMSIndividual grant recipient: $222,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWebster Rock Hill Ministry: $150,000 · OtherWebster Rock Hill MinistryLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICES OF MISSOUR: $107,847 · OtherLUTHERAN SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY AT CHICAGO: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · Other+3 more: $101,450 · OtherDePauw University: $275,000 · EducationDePauw Un…HOME SWEET HOME: $160,000 · Human ServicesDAKOTA BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH: $25,000 · Human ServicesLOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $138,000 · HealthTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Health
Other$2,581,697Education$275,000Human Services$210,000Health$208,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $300,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetDePauw University: $275,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOME SWEET HOME: $160,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $138,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetDAKOTA BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetLUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI: $24,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds DePauw University ↗
  • Who funds HOME SWEET HOME ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAKOTA BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES FOR ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF MISSOURI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

World Wide Technology FoundationMO15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: World Wide Technology Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Edward Jones Foundation · Pott Foundation · The Neeb Family Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Floy L and Paul F Cornelsen Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Floy L and Paul F Cornelsen Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Floy L and Paul F Cornelsen Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Floy L and Paul F Cornelsen Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Floy L and Paul F Cornelsen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph