Skip to content

Utah · Private foundation

The Field Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$26k
Granted FY2022
48
Grants FY2022
46
Organizations funded FY2022
72%
First-time grantees FY2022
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

91% of The Field Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Field Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 30 organizations, $26k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
2
’18
1
’19
1
’20
7
’21
30
’22
7
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2022
$100
Largest grant, FY2022
$9,960
Organizations funded a year
2 to 46
FY2017 to FY2022
States reached, FY2022
9
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2022, 72% of the organizations The Field Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 20% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
InternationalEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202246$24k72%
FY202113$227k54%
FY20202$52k0%
FY20192$21k0%
FY20184$11k75%
FY20175$12kn/a
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$272kPhilanthropy$235kReligion$69kEducation$9kCrime & Legal$6kArts & Culture$4kRecreation & Sports$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OH
CA
UT
NE
MD
AZ
NM
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Congregation Kol Ami$66,8007n/a
Jewish Family Service$4,60030%
University of Utah$3,6002n/a
Chavurah B Yachad$2,5001n/a
Ririe-Woodbury Dance Foundation$1,50020%
Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc$90030%
Repertory Dance Theatre$80020%
USA Deaf Sports Federation Inc$70020%
Friends of Utah Avalanche Fore Cast Center Inc$60020%
Special Olympics Utah Inc$50030%
Show all 33 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 19 recipients with no EIN on record ($282k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Field Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Family Service: $4,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRirie-Woodbury Dance Foundation: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRepertory Dance Theatre: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUSA Deaf Sports Federation Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFriends of Utah Avalanche Fore Cast Center Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSpecial Olympics Utah Inc: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe McGillis School: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWasatch Adaptive Sports Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Food Bank: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuscular Dystrophy Association Inc: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trust for Public Land: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Grand Canyon Trust Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Dine Bikeyah: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmnesty International of the USA Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Utah: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Road Home: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrganiceye Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Fund for Unicef: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEntrada Institute Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Biological Diversity Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of UtahUT23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · American Express Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Emma Eccles Jones Foundation · Petersen Bruce & Cecilia Fdn-Main

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Field Foundation with peer funders

About The Field Foundation

How much does The Field Foundation give?
The Field Foundation reported 48 grants totaling $25,674 in its FY2022 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 46 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2022.
What does The Field Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Human Services (45%), Philanthropy (39%), Religion (12%).
Who are The Field Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: Congregation Kol Ami ($67k), Jewish Family Service ($5k), University of Utah ($4k).
Does The Field Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2022, 72% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Field Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Field Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Community Foundation of Utah, George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation, Marriner S Eccles Foundation.
Where is The Field Foundation based?
The Field Foundation is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Field’s filings →

More from the funding graph