Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Fansler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$2.9MYouth Development$2.0MHuman Services$2.0MEducation$1.9MHousing & Shelter$692kCrime & Legal$531kFood & Nutrition$482kRecreation & Sports$148kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $199k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $947k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO$150,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$140,236
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$128,496
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA$115,571
MARJAREE MASON CENTER$96,062
HEART OF THE HORSE$83,000
FRESNO COUNCIL ON CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION$67,315
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK$66,302
SAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL$50,200
BUDDHIST TZU CHI MEDICAL FOUNDATION$50,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION$39,700
CARE FRESNO$36,312
HAPPY TRAILS RIDING ACADEMY$27,000
DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING SERVICES$25,993
CALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION$23,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 14%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 10%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $59k → 19%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 10%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $59k → 19%LIGHT HOUSE FOR THE BLIND: $15k → 10%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $56k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $51k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $35k → 19%HIGHWAY CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $19k → 19%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $52k → 19%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $52k → 19%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $50k → 19%EXCEPTIONAL PARENT UNLIMITED: $48k → 19%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $45k → 19%EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED: $32k → 19%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $8k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $120k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $100k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $89k → 19%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $4k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $96k → 19%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $5k → 19%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $3k → 19%HINDS HOSPICE: $67k → 19%VALLEY TEEN RANCH: $30k → 19%VALLEY TEEN RANCH: $25k → 19%VALLEY TEEN RANCH: $20k → 19%HINDS HOSPICE: $20k → 19%VALLEY TEEN RANCH: $10k → 19%HINDS HOSPICE: $5k → 19%CITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 51 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
20

Total granted

$11M
$722k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+16%

Still filing today

41%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $298k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $736k · revenue +84%
  • CC
    CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK
    7× · 2019–2025 · $406k · revenue +92%
  • MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2025 · $405k · revenue +210%

Funded once

  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTHY SYSTEM
    one grant, 2022 · $142k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2023 · $132k
  • HS
    HEALTHY SMILES
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
2
Valley Center for the Blind

To support, train, and employ people who are blind or low vision and increase their opportunities to lead an independent and fulfilling life.

Health
3
Family Services of Tulare County Inc

The mission of Family Services is to help children, adults, and families throughout Tulare County heal from violence and thrive in healthy relationships. Family Services will accomplish this mission through direct services, advocacy,…

Human Services
4
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
5
Family Care Network Inc

The mission of the Family Care Network is to enhance the wellbeing of children, adults, and families in partnership with our community.

—
6
California Family Life Center

California family life center's mission is to provide safety, comfort and healing to children suffering abuse and abandonment; to teach love and trust; to instill self-esteem, values and hope for the future - and in so doing, assist…

Human Services
7
KidsFirst Child Abuse Prevention Council of Placer County

Our mission is to end child abuse and neglect through educating, advocating, and counseling to empower and strengthen children and families. Our vision is that all children live in a safe, healthy, and nurturing environment.

Crime & Legal
8
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
9
Serra Residential Center Inc

To provide dignity, respect and choice for persons with developmental disabilities

—
10
Central Valley Regional Center

The center's mission is to help individuals with developmental disabilities, and children at risk, to reach their goals.

Human Services
11
Fresno Building Healthy Communities

To foster and encourage thriving communities where all children and families can live healthy, safe, and productive lives

Community Improvement
12
Pathway Family Services Inc

None

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Exceptional Parents Unlimited Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $778,826 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERSIndividual grant recipient: $750,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRESOURCE CENTER FOR SURVIVORS: $586,639 · OtherRESOURCE CENTER FOR SURVIVORSIndividual grant recipient: $541,097 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUCP OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $474,996 · OtherUCP OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITYFRESNO: $450,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITYFRESNOIndividual grant recipient: $401,973 · OtherHEART OF THE HORSE: $380,100 · OtherSAN JOAQUIN MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $360,300 · OtherCARE FRESNO INC: $358,282 · OtherFCCAP: $355,559 · OtherTZU CHI MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $300,000 · Other+43 more: $2,617,888 · Other+43 moreMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $404,641 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MAS…EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED INC: $278,530 · Human ServicesEXCEPTIONAL …Break the Barriers Inc: $260,105 · Human ServicesBreak the Ba…Hinds Hospice: $91,767 · Human ServicesHinds Hospic…Valley Teen Ranch: $84,640 · Human ServicesValley Teen …LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $80,400 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE F…+3 more: $82,950 · Human Services+3 moreBoys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc: $735,786 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $97,500 · Youth DevelopmentADVENTURE RISK CHALLENGE: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $406,302 · Food & NutritionDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $181,250 · HealthDEAF AND HARD OF HEARING SERVICE CENTER: $144,793 · HealthCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $30,357 · HealthALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION: $22,250 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · HealthFAMILY LEADERSHIP INC: $254,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION: $90,500 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $178,339 · Housing & Shelter
Other$8,355,660Human Services$1,283,033Youth Development$878,286Food & Nutrition$406,302Health$388,650Education$354,500Housing & Shelter$178,339

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc: $735,786 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK: $406,302 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $404,641 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetCARE FRESNO INC: $358,282 over 9y, 21% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED INC: $278,530 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBreak the Barriers Inc: $260,105 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY LEADERSHIP INC: $254,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $181,250 over 6y, 31% of budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $178,339 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetDEAF AND HARD OF HEARING SERVICE CENTER: $144,793 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $97,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHinds Hospice: $91,767 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION: $90,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetValley Teen Ranch: $84,640 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $80,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRESNO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL INC: $67,315 over 1y, 21% of budgetVISALIA RESCUE MISSION: $62,160 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWINGS ADVOCACY FRESNO: $60,500 over 5y, 11% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $47,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL VALLEY JUSTICE COALITION: $46,430 over 2y, 9.6% of budgetADVENTURE RISK CHALLENGE: $45,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOSPITALS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $30,357 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHAPPY TRAILS RIDING ACADEMY: $27,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCITY WITHOUT ORPHANS: $23,950 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetALISA ANN RUCH BURN FOUNDATION: $22,250 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetHIGHWAY CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $19,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGET FOCUSED STAY FOCUSED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSCOUTING AMERICA SEQUOIA COUNCIL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CALIFORNIA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CARE FRESNO INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL PARENTS UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Break the Barriers Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LEADERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds Hinds Hospice ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA SCOTTISH RITE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Valley Teen Ranch ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds FRESNO CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds VISALIA RESCUE MISSION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Isnardi FoundationCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Isnardi Foundation · Valley Children's Hospital · Leon S Peters Foundation · Briscoe Family Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Rotary Club of Fresno Foundation · Sieg & Doris Fischer FDN-AGY-MAIN · Aetna Foundation Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Fansler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Fansler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Fansler Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Fansler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fansler’s filings →

    More from the funding graph