· Private foundation
The F Danz Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k8 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES | $150,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $25,000 |
| NORTHWEST HARVEST | $10,000 |
| KLINE GALLAND HOME | $10,000 |
| FOOD LIFELINE | $10,000 |
| HOPELINK | $10,000 |
| LIFEWIRE | $5,000 |
| PAWS | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $5,000 |
| KINDERING | $5,000 |
| NORTH HELPLINE | $5,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| TREEHOUSE | $5,000 |
| CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES | $4,403 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC2× · 2021–2022 · $275k · revenue +39%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2019–2022 · $75k · revenue +39%
- FLFOOD LIFELINE4× · 2019–2022 · $55k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- JFJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue +121%
- SESTUDIO EAST TRAINING FOR THE PERFORMING ARTSone grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue -16%
- KCKIDSQUEST CHILDREN'S MUSEUMgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.
Network services has been serving homeless families in the puget sound area since 1990, with a focus on families with children. network services aims to break the cycle of homelessness by providing assistance to families with children to…
To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.
Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.
Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.
Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.
Fighting hunger, feeding hope: second harvest brings community resources together to feed people in need through empowerment, education, and partnerships.
Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities
LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.
Our mission is to provide a variety of food products to families and individuals who are in need. We are open one day a week.
KCSARC is the largest and most comprehensive non-profit provider of sexual assault services in King County and Washington State. Our vision is a community free of sexual violence. Our mission is to: give voice to victims, their families,…
The mission of the organization is to contribute to improved food security by providing consistent access to nutritious food, reducing hunger, and supporting the health and well-being of individuals and families in the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Harvest Emm and the most unlike its peers is Studio East Training for the Performing Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Civil Liberties Union of Washington Found ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds LifeWire ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds STUDIO EAST TRAINING FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds FOOD LIFELINE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
- Who funds KIDSQUEST CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds KINDERING CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS ↗
- Who funds HOPELINK ↗
- Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗
- Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds North Helpline ↗
- Who funds RAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds PIONEER HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · United Way of King County · Seattle Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Windermere Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The F Danz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.