How much does The Eos Foundation Trust give?

The Eos Foundation Trust reported 2 grants totaling $1,014,161 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 31 and 71 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does The Eos Foundation Trust fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (35%), Public Benefit (20%), Religion (12%).

Who are The Eos Foundation Trust's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Barack Obama Foundation ($2.0M), Unity School of Christianity ($1.3M), Rivertree Academy ($654k).

Does The Eos Foundation Trust fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Eos Foundation Trust accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Eos Foundation Trust?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Annenberg Foundation, Seckinger Foundation Corporation, Texas Instruments Foundation.

Where is The Eos Foundation Trust based?

The Eos Foundation Trust is based in TX.

The Eos Foundation Trust

The Eos Foundation Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Eos Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$790k

Largest

01What it funds

0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.7MPublic Benefit$2.1MReligion$1.3MInternational$885kHealth$565kScience & Tech$400kHuman Services$325kArts & Culture$306kOther$0

02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

$50k–250k1 grant · $224k
$250k+1 grant · $790k

$789,712

Median grant

States reached

$32M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
UNITY SCHOOL OF CHRISTIANITY	$789,712
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA	$224,449

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $268k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$9.6M · 93 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

93 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 92 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

111

Total granted

$9.6M

$912k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%

+17%

Still filing today

72%

67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $224k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RA
RIVERTREE ACADEMY
6× · 2017–2022 · $654k · revenue +70%
TJ
TRAUMA JOURNALISM FOUNDATION INC
2× · 2022–2023 · $225k · revenue ×52 · 99% of their budget
US
UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION
2× · 2017–2019 · $125k · revenue +78%

Funded once

UO
UNIVERSITY OF AZ FOUNDATION DISCOVERY PROJECT
one grant, 2024 · $163k
UO
UNIV OF AZ FOUNDATION-FLANDRAU SCIENCE CTR
one grant, 2020 · $50k
CF
CATHOLIC FND FOR THE DIOCESE OF TUCSON
one grant, 2019 · $50k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment

Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education

Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—

Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights

Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science

Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals

The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International

Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International

Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services

Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International

Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

144 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 144 of the 205 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

141/144

Grantees still filing

99/144

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$6,113,934Arts & Culture$2,184,269International$924,200Youth Development$664,500Human Services$287,700Health$255,750Education$255,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg FoundationPA29× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Farrell Family Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eos Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eos Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

7get no government money at all

24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Eos’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home