Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Emry Oxford Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$66kHealth$24kHuman Services$12kPhilanthropy$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kScience & Tech$1kEnvironment$500Animals$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRENCH CAMP ACADEMY$30,000
MS DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$30,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$5,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON$5,000
GRANDMOTHER PROJECT INC$5,000
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL$2,500
WAVES PROJECT INC$2,500
MAYO CLINIC$2,500
HODDING CARTER MEMORIAL YMCA$2,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$2,000
PRECIOUS PAWS MS$1,000
MAGNOLIA SPEECH SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF$1,000
ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC$1,000
CENTRAL CARIBBEAN MARINE INSTITUTE$1,000
LE BONHEUR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT INC: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OH
NJ
CA
MD
TN
LA
MS
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$186k · 14 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
7

Total granted

$186k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+45%

Still filing today

71%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GP
    GRANDMOTHER PROJECT INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +15%
  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
    3× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +25%
  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • UC
    United Cajun Navygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +421%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue +12%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
2
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
3
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Upper Chesapeake Medical Services Inc

To provide physician services to patients of the university of maryland upper chesapeake health system.

Health
6
The Mount Sinai Medical Center

Provide fundraising, support, and maintains pooled investments for entities of the mount sinai health system, inc.

Health
7
Umass Memorial Health Care Inc (Parent)

Umass memorial health care, inc. is committed to improving the health of the people of central new england through excellence in clinical care, services, teaching, and research.

Health
8
The Marine Mammal Center

The marine mammal center advances global ocean conservation through marine mammal rescue and rehabilitation, scientific research, and education. the center's work is guided and inspired by a shared vision of a healthy ocean for marine…

Animals
9
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Upper Chesapeake Health System Inc

To assist in the management of and to provide services to related healthcare affiliates.

Health
11
Marine Conservation Biology Institute

Marine conservation institute is dedicated to securing permanent, strong protection for the oceans' most important places for us and future generations.

Education
12
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Mississippi Chartered; the most unlike its peers is Waves Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MS DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $85,000 · OtherMS DELTA COMMUNITY COLLEGECOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTON: $11,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WASHINGTONYALE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · OtherLE BONHEUR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $4,000 · Other+10 more: $9,850 · Other+10 moreFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY: $40,500 · EducationFRENCH CAMP ACADEMYMAYO CLINIC: $7,500 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $7,500 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI …MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $6,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUN…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER …MAGNOLIA SPEECH SCHOOL: $3,000 · HealthMAGNOLIA SPEECH …GRANDMOTHER PROJECT INC: $15,500 · InternationalELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Cajun Navy: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCENTRAL CARIBBEAN MARINE INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 · Science & Tech
Other$115,350Education$40,500Health$31,000International$15,500Philanthropy$3,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Science & Tech$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRENCH CAMP ACADEMY: $40,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGRANDMOTHER PROJECT INC: $15,500 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $6,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAGNOLIA SPEECH SCHOOL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Cajun Navy: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL CARIBBEAN MARINE INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARKS4KIDS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPARMA COMMISSION ON AGING INC: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Emry Oxford Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Emry Oxford Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Emry Oxford’s filings →

More from the funding graph